Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Christopher Dodd on withdrawing troops and Presidential bid

Posted by Bob Geiger at 8:01 AM on December 26, 2006.


Connecticut Democrat laying groundwork for 2008 ...
doddabc122406
Dodd ABC 122406

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Connecticut's Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd has come out in favor of beginning an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, saying that "…the president should announce in January that we will begin withdrawing and redeploying our troops."

In an editorial in the Sunday Des Moines Register -- and clearly laying the groundwork for the Iowa presidential caucuses -- Dodd was very direct from the first sentence of his column.

"The time has come for the United States to begin the process of getting our troops out of Iraq," wrote Dodd, who many think will indeed run for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

An excerpt:

"In Baghdad last week, I joined in a conversation with a West Point graduate who is serving in Iraq. He said, 'Senator, it is nuts over here. Soldiers are being asked to do work we're not trained to do. I'm doing work that State Department people are far more prepared to do in fostering democracy, but they're not allowed to come off the bases because it's too dangerous here. It doesn't make any sense.'

"After spending six days in the Middle East last week - which included visits with the top leaders in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Israel - it's hard not to come to the same conclusion: Our strategy in Iraq makes no sense. It never really did. It is as bad in person as it appears on television. There are literally dozens of sects, militias, gangs, warlords, foreign terrorists and others killing one another for dozens of reasons in Iraq today, and American troops are caught in the crossfire.

"Our brave men and women have done everything asked of them with great courage and honor, but searching for military solutions in Iraq today is a fool's errand. True peace and security in Iraq will not come at the end of an American gun. It will only happen to the degree that Iraq's leaders are willing to take responsibility for governing their own country and securing their own future. America's position should be clear: Iraqis must show they want a country now, or American troops should begin to withdraw."
Dodd has said that he will evaluate in the next month or two whether or not to pursue the presidency, but that the state of the world and the fact that he has young children enters significantly into his choice.

"I've got two very young daughters that I'm going to celebrate Christmas with tomorrow and I want them to grow up in a century in this country that offers as many opportunities as those provided to my generation," said Dodd, when appearing on ABC's This Week on Sunday. "And those are the motivations I'm thinking about and on the basis of that and the other factors as to whether or not I can win this race and attract additional support is something that I'll evaluate over the next couple of weeks."

But he conceded that he has been looking at a presidential run since the summer, including having staff already assembled in early primary states.

"I began the process of looking at it seriously last June," he said. " It's gone well over the summer and fall months. I've been to the critical caucus and primary states, put together a good staff to try to raise the necessary resources."

"I'm very worried, as I think many Americans are, about our conditions at home and abroad and whether or not America is going to be a stable and secure country in the 21st century."

Digg!

Tagged as: presidency, 2008

Bob Geiger is a writer, activist and Democratic operative in Westchester County, NY. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 26, 2006 7:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Sen. Dodd. This 'surge' idea is ill conceived and will not work. We are seriously out numbered in that part of the world 20-30 thousand can easily be matched. It's exactly what happened in Viet Nam. All it did was prolong the war and take the lives of almost 60 thousand Americans. Bush's war might now be with the American people. We can't continue to be observers. We should fight him on this. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANOTHER REASON TO GET THE HELL OUT
Posted by: mdruss42 on Dec 27, 2006 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Depleted' uranium is in many ways a misnomer. For 'depleted' sounds weak. The only weak thing about depleted uranium is its price. It is dirt cheap, toxic, waste from nuclear power plants and bomb production. However, uranium is one of earth's heaviest elements and DU packs a Tyson's punch, smashing through tanks, buildings and bunkers with equal ease, spontaneously catching fire as it does so, and burning people alive. 'Crispy critters' is what US servicemen call those unfortunate enough to be close. And, when John Pilger encountered children killed at a greater distance he wrote: "The children's skin had folded back, like parchment, revealing veins and burnt flesh that seeped blood, while the eyes, intact, stared straight ahead. I vomited." (Daily Mirror)

The millions of radioactive uranium oxide particles released when it burns can kill just as surely, but far more terribly. They can even be so tiny they pass through a gas mask, making protection against them impossible. Yet, small is not beautiful. For these invisible killers indiscriminately attack men, women, children and even babies in the womb-and do the gravest harm of all to children and unborn babies.

A Terrible Legacy

Doctors in Iraq have estimated that birth defects have increased by 2-6 times, and 3-12 times as many children have developed cancer and leukaemia since 1991. Moreover, a report published in The Lancet in 1998 said that as many as 500 children a day are dying from these sequels to war and sanctions and that the death rate for Iraqi children under 5 years of age increased from 23 per 1000 in 1989 to 166 per thousand in 1993. Overall, cases of lymphoblastic leukemia more than quadrupled with other cancers also increasing 'at an alarming rate'. In men, lung, bladder, bronchus, skin, and stomach cancers showed the highest increase. In women, the highest increases were in breast and bladder cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.1


JAMES DENVER, GLOBAL RESEARCH, MAY 6, 2005

THIS IS WHAT WILL BE BLOWING IN ON A TRADE WIND NEAR YOU......OR PROBABLY ALREADY IS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political wiggle room
Posted by: Edward George on Dec 27, 2006 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush team has taught me a bitter lesson. Redeployment does not mean removal from Iraq. Even "withdrawal" doesn't mean leaving Iraq. I will believe this politician if and only if he really spells it out. I will start to believe him when he promises that if he is elected as soon as he takes office he will order the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State to remove every last American citizen from Iraq and brought to the United States as quickly and safely as possible and cancel every contract paid for by the US government for work of any kind in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imagine What We Would Have Said In 1941
Posted by: Carl Street on Dec 27, 2006 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Suppose in 1941 Hitler had said, "It appears I invaded and conquered Europe by mistake; but now that I have done it, the German army cannot just pick up and go because we have a responsibility to ensure a proper government is set up before we leave."

I suspect there would have been few, if any, that believed Hitler and/or accepted that line of reasoning.

Think not? Actually, in many ways that is EXACTLY what Hitler did do -- he turned most of France over to the Vichy government; withdrew the bulk of his military forces; and attempted to negotiate a peace treaty with Britain.

Of course, we all know what happened then -- that old Fanatical Terrorist Extremist Winston Churchill refused to negotiate and stated there would be no negotiations and that the war would continue until with God's help his country prevailed. Interestingly enough, we could substituted Osama Ben Laden for Winston Churchill in the preceeding statement and it would STILL read accurately!

Think! about THAT! -- the key word is THINK!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Presidential Poll now reveals leaders
Posted by: pn4pm on Dec 28, 2006 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can find something of interest to the Progressive Polling for Presidential preferences.

Choose A
Progressive Presidential Candidate Here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]