Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Classified memo on Iraqi PM:

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 8:53 AM on November 29, 2006.


Bush admin has little confidence they can stop the violence...
dogchasingtail
dog tail

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The NY Times reports on another boo-boo that is the fiasco of Iraq:

A classified memorandum by President Bush’s national security adviser expressed serious doubts about whether Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki had the capacity to control the sectarian violence in Iraq and recommended that the United States take new steps to strengthen the Iraqi leader’s position.

The Times opts for "sectarian violence" over "civil war" it should be noted, despite NBC's change of heart and Barry Lando's excellent piece in today's LA Times.

That aside, here's the two things to keep in mind while reading the Times article on the subject: 1. Most leaks are intentional and this one tells the American people that the Bush admin is coming down hard on its puppets and 2. This is America's government to play with. And therein lies the problem...

There's no easy answer: the government is weak and can't end the violence, the U.S. needs to come in and help, the U.S. coming in and helping has a limit because the government is then tainted by Occupation association, the government remains unable to end the Civil War...

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, iraq, civil war, memo

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why assume Maliki is "weak"?
Posted by: SteveB on Nov 29, 2006 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's an alternative theory:
Most of the deaths in Iraq today caused by "sectarian violence" are now due to Shia death squads. Of course the Iraqi government is claiming that these people are acting outside the law and it is powerless to stop them. That's what every death-squad-using government claims. This tactic is so familiar it even has a name: the "Salvador Option". And part of the "Salvador Option" is for the U.S. to claim that it's "pressuring" our client state to get the death squads under control.

These Shia death squads are the Shia-dominated government's preferred method of oppressing and controlling the minority Sunni population, and the U.S.. as a supporter of that government, is complicit.

Since the end-state has already been determined (Shia dictatorship with death squads) what purpose is served by continuing the U.S. military occupation of Iraq?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why assume Maliki is "weak"? Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Why assume Maliki is "weak"? Posted by: Ian MacLeod