Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lieberman hires neo-con chameleon

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 1:24 PM on November 21, 2006.


Takes two steps to the Right
hast4
Lieberman will have to be careful not to step in the Bull(Moose)shit.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

With the acquisition of former Christian Coalition Legislative Affairs director, Marshall "Bull Moose" Wittman, Lieberman continues his glacial break from the Democratic Party. Maybe he'll talk about it tonight with Hannity & Colmes on Fox?

Wittman, a former cohort of the CC's scandal-plagued leader, Ralph Reed, has made his home at the withering Democratic Leadership Council's PPI think tank and as an adviser to John McCain, who recently began pandering to right wing bigots like Jerry Falwell in his bid for the '08 presidency. Wittman praised the move as "unconventional." Because, you know, pandering to someone you don't agree with in politics doesn't come often.

He abandoned his "Bull Moose" blog with this sentiment:

The great and grand political development of the past year has been the triumph of Independent - Democrat Senator Joe Lieberman. Joe has bravely revived the great tradition of Scoop Jackson that is so critically needed at this time of international challenge and crisis.

For those unfamiliar with Henry "Scoop" Jackson, he was a (proto-neo-) conservative Democrat who vigorously supported the Vietnam War, nuclear arms, Japanese internment during WWII, and a Steroidal military in general. In a 2002 profile the Guardian UK wrote of Jackson that: "One man more than any other can credibly claim the intellectual and political credit for the Bush administration's bellicose showdown with Iraq and its muscular new doctrine of pre-emption."

Wittman, along with Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle (who worked for "Scoop" and retains his Democratic registration in his honor), Elliot Abrams, and Douglas Feith, are all followers of Jackson, along with, of course, Joe Lieberman.

Jackson, Wittman, Lieberman, and the neocons are a tough bunch to pin down in some ways. Largely a bunch of social liberals (they generally, rhetorically at least, support some semblance of environmental responsibility, concern for the poor, equality for people of color etc etc), though their foreign policy is riddled with White Man's Burden-style optimism.

In some oafishly narrow sense they seek to liberate the world (parts of it anyway) from tyranny. The problem with this omelet, of course, is all the eggs that have to be cracked along the way. Delivering liberation at the tip of a gun, they've managed to push for Vietnam and much of our misguided Middle East policy, ironically sapping our military and turning perception of America on its head.

Lieberman has strong ties to the Christian Zionist/Conservative Jewish network, including Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, John Hagee and the Left Behind players, and so does Wittman, from his days in Robertson's Christian Coalition.

With the hiring of Wittman, Lieberman rounds the homestretch to neo-con-dom. Nothing new here... just the final creaking sounds of a ship going under.

Digg!

Tagged as: neocons, lieberman, christian conservatives

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lieberman IS a neocon, and he's also in bed with Cheney
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 21, 2006 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should have been clear a long time ago, and perhaps Ned Lamont's great mistake was that he didn't bring this issue up right after the Democratic primary.

The first indication is Lieberman's membership in the Committee for the Present Danger. The other members include ex-CIA spook James Woolsey,who was instumental in cooking up the fake WMD stories, a plan apparently hatched when he met with the Iraqi National Congress members in October 2001 in London. Woolsey also claims to be in favor of ethanol as a fuel replacement for oil, which is surprising if true. George Schultz, another prominent member, has been an important Bush advisor and is also on the board of Bechtel and Gilead (Rumsfeld's biotech company, holder of the Tamiflu patent). I think if more people in Connecticut had been aware of this, they'd have repudiated Lieberman. See Foreign Policy in Focus: Neocons reform the CPD

The roots of the Comittee on the Present Danger and "Team B" strech back to Cheney and Rumsfeld's tenure in the Ford Administration. The whole story is well told by Sydney Blumenthal in Salon, "The Long March of Dick Cheney", Nov 24 2005.

This story is very important; it helps explain why the Cold War coninued as long as it did, it explains the massive buildup of nuclear weapons by the USA in the 80's (profit motive) - in short, you're talking about the fact that ever since WWII ended the arms dealers and power brokers have been loathe to give up their lucrative profits and so have always pushed "military solutions" over diplomatic ones every chance they get. The Office of Special Plans appears to be the most recent incarnation.
The story is also told in movie form by the BBC: Baby It's Cold Outside - 'The Power of Nightmares"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

and you are surprised because?
Posted by: edith on Nov 21, 2006 3:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
odd article. yes, it's interesting that wittman has a christian coal. connection. but wittman is a neocon more than a hard core social conserative like Brownback, Reed, Falwell, Coburn. Lieberman is conservative in his personal views on say gays or abortion, but doesn't shove his beliefs down other people's throats the way W, Cheney, Reagan or Brownback would do. Neocons, if you want to play the game of who influenced whom, go back to the second Nixon term when Jackson and even Humphrey liberals were fed up with the "hippie" peacenik so called infux into the Party by the then aging protesters of Vietnam. Eventually almost all became Republicans. Lieberman actually opposed the Vietnam War, met the Clintons while he was beginning his career as an antiwar reformer in Connecticut where they were Yale Law students. Lieberman broke a bit with the Democrats over the Iraq War, faith based initiatives and some probusiness tax cuts, though he opposed the overall big reductions for high income folks that was the real divide between Dems and GOP in first Bush term.

Wittman may need Lieberman more than Lieberman needs him or Christian Right. Right now, Harry Reid would have to do a pole dance if Joe snapped his fingers and gave Harry a dollar. Joe becomes unhappy, and Dick Cheney's vote determines tie votes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Socially Liberal
Posted by: chaoslegs on Nov 22, 2006 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure on SOME of the wedge issues. But as an atheist I have found his comments on needing religion to have morality to be offensive. And on economic justice issues, he is a total corporate lackey (see bankrupcty bill (vote for cloture), accounting standards, etc...).

It is these issues that I fault him for as much his pro-war "what me worry" stance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]