Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Netanyahu cries: "Hitler! Hitler! Hitler!"

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 8:49 AM on November 17, 2006.


Israel's former-PM pushes war on Iran
robertsonnetanyahu
Netanyahu's back as he "puts 'er there" with Pat Robertson.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Israel's former (and possibly future) right wing Prime Minister, Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu is not the kind of person you want to make decisions about what to eat for dinner or which shirt to wear, let alone foreign policy.

This week, according to Ha'aretz, Netanyahu said [VIDEO]:

"It's 1938 and Iran is Germany. And Iran is racing to arm itself with atomic bombs," Netanyahu told delegates to the annual United Jewish Communities General Assembly, repeating the line several times, like a chorus, during his address. "Believe him and stop him," the opposition leader said of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "This is what we must do. Everything else pales before this."

While the Iranian president "denies the Holocaust," Netanyahu said, "he is preparing another Holocaust for the Jewish state."

Wow, that IS scary. Except for a few problems. Like Netanyahu's predilection for...

Hitler/Nazi comparisons with respect to nations that don't have anything to do with Nazis or Hitler or prewar Europe or National Socialism... Let's start there.

In a 2002 Wall St. Journal Iraq War promotional extravaganza, the former Prime Minister wrote:

This is a dictator... who is feverishly trying to acquire nuclear weapons.

Today nothing less than dismantling his regime will do. For Saddam's nuclear program has changed. He no longer needs one large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country -- and Iraq is a very big country. Even free and unfettered inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites of mass death.

We now know that had the democracies taken pre-emptive action to bring down Hitler's regime in the 1930s, the worst horrors in history could have been avoided. And we now know, from defectors and other intelligence, that had Israel not launched its pre-emptive strike on Saddam's atomic-bomb factory recent history would have taken a far more dangerous course.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Netanyahu was wrong then and there's no reason to listen to him now. Your integrity and credibility are blown, sir.

As for the second part of his most recent statements about the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad "preparing another Holocaust for the Jewish state."

That's more interesting, actually, as it betrays one of the great myths peddled by conservative Jews and their allies who seek war with Iran: that Ahmadinejad has anything approaching the power to do harm to Israel or the U.S.

First off, and I apologize in advance for the caps, but this is a mistake echoed by everyone from Fox News to the NY Times: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad IS NOT THE LEADER OF IRAN AND HE DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO ATTACK ANYONE. He is: "the highest state authority after the Supreme Leader," who "is Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has sole power to declare war."

Here's the Times, letting Olmert have his way with pro-war talking points:

"The fact that the leader of a nation such as Iran can threaten the very existence of another nation, as he does towards Israel," Mr. Olmert said of the Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "is not something that we can tolerate or would ever tolerate."

Iranian media on Monday quoted Mr. Ahmadinejad saying of Israel, "We will soon witness its disappearance and destruction."

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, no friend to Western freedom to be sure, isn't a bombastic bonehead like Ahmadinejad. He doesn't have to cater to the lowest common denominator to maintain popularity (such as it is...). Khamenei speaks little of Israel and has even issued a fatwa: "forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that the Islamic Republic of Iran shall never acquire these weapons."

In fact, not only doesn't Iran have a nuclear weapon but, according to Israeli experts, it's many years away from the ability to acquire one...

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, israel, ahmadinejad, hitler, netanyahu, nuclear weapons

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
War on Iraq-Made in Israel
Posted by: rwa on Nov 17, 2006 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel manipulated western intelligence agencies to attack Iraq. Here is a story about this from the Hebrew Press where an Israeli general admits how his government manipulated the American and British intelligence agencies:

Quote:
How Israel Manipulated Western Intelligence Agencies
Richard H. Curtiss

WASHINGTON, 19 December 2003 — It’s no secret that much of the news reported in Israel’s Hebrew-language media never reaches the mainstream American press, for the simple reason that items unfavorable to Israel generally are not translated. And, because very few Israelis break this self-imposed censorship, items from the Hebrew press that do appear may be much more newsworthy than their anemic English translations indicate.

It was a bit stunning, therefore, to read an article in Strategic Assessment, the quarterly bulletin issued by the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University. The report, titled “The War in Iraq: An Intelligence Failure?” was written by Shlomo Brom, a brigadier general in the Israeli Army reserves, and said what no one seems to have dared publish since President George W. Bush decided to wage war on Iraq. Shockingly, it told the full truth about the American and British intelligence “sources” making the case for war.

In fact, according to Brom, these sources were utterly compromised by Israeli intelligence, which made the case for starting the war and kept it going as long as necessary. The retired general described Israel as a “full partner” in US and British intelligence failures that exaggerated Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs in the lead up to the US-led invasion…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» SO? Posted by: PEEK
» RE: SO? Posted by: rwa
» RE: SO? Posted by: Burton
» RE: SO? Posted by: Graeme
» Just Following Orders Posted by: edith
can you say...propaganda??
Posted by: imstephencrane on Nov 17, 2006 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love how "Bibi" is trying to get everyone excited about the prospect of another holocaust and omgiosh! the chance to maybe defeat it this time! Ironically the Israei occupation of Palestine is more like the holocaust than Iran's "stockpile of nuclear weapons" is. It feels like its the 60s again and anyone opposing Israel is an anti-semite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: can you say...propaganda?? Posted by: wlgriffi
» RE: can you say...propaganda?? Posted by: rinpochet
The ancient Israeli art of spin
Posted by: eddie torres on Nov 17, 2006 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq had "biological weapons" (BoTox in a fridge), "cruise-missile-equivalents" (a Cessna loaded with TNT), and "atomic weapons programs" (washing machines disguised as centrifuges). Better invade.

Israel had a far more successful approach to its WMD production: stealing fissile material from US stockpiles at Rocky Flats and Savannah River. And smuggling more material in from South Africa. No need to invade there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Israels Nuclear cabalities
Posted by: fmajor7 on Nov 17, 2006 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1986 descriptions and photographs of Israeli nuclear warheads were published in the London Sunday Times of a purported underground bomb factory. The photographs were taken by Mordechai Vanunu, a dismissed Israeli nuclear technician. His information led some experts to conclude that Israel had a stockpile of 100 to 200 nuclear devices at that time. Vanunu was arrested by the Israleli govt and he was imprisoned for 18 years.
Israel remains the greatest threat to the middle-east stability and peace and also the most dangerous country in the world (EU survey 2003).
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may have a point.
I think the best solution for everybody is for Israel to be moved to one of those near-empty states of US (South Dakota, North Dakota,Nevada etc...). There they can happily breed for the next 1000 years and leave the palestinians and the rest of the middle east and the world in peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Israels Nuclear cabalities Posted by: rinpochet
» RE: Israels Nuclear cabalities Posted by: mountainsrock
» RE: Israels Nuclear cabalities Posted by: herroyalhighness
Doomed to repeat
Posted by: ozonekid on Nov 17, 2006 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a kid growing up in New York, and being half-Jewish, supporting Israel was as natural as playing stick ball; everybody stood up for the "little guy", and we believed in the story of a brave people surrounded by enemies. It has been disturbing in the extreme to watch a nation which once exemplified courage, freedom and political diversity morph into the beast which once persecuted the Jews; a fascist state.
Am I the only one who sees parallels between the assault on Gaza and the liquidation of the Warsaw ghetto? Why did Israel have to destroy the entire nation of Lebanon and thousands of civilians to punish a kidnapping incident? How did the Anarchist spirit of the Kibbutzim turn into ethnic cleansing, property expropriation and casual checkpoint brutality?
I know many Israelis have a strong desire to live in peace with their neighbors, but like support for the IRA, most of the support for Israel's policies come from America, where one doesn't have to look at murdered Palestinian children or smashed neighborhoods every day.
I am not a Utopian and have no illusions regarding peace "processes"; many groups claim the same real estate over there, and the conflicts are extant for generations. But please don't call me anti-Semitic for pointing out the shocking similarities between those who occupied Poland, and those who occupy Palestine. Please don't liken political opposition with dehumanization and bigotry.
The Israeli hawks and their sponsors, the American defense industry are all of a piece. They are interested in total domination and perpetual war. Let responsible Israeli voices prevail, and stop the killing in the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Better to look to the future Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Better to look to the future Posted by: mountainsrock
For a minute there I thought....
Posted by: Rod in 83706 on Nov 17, 2006 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Netanyau was yelling "Hitler!" in reference to Bush, but I guess not. Hopes dashed, again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran - friend and ally . . .
Posted by: MAD on Nov 17, 2006 9:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell us all about the magnanimous and benevolent Ahmadinejad and his Islamic paradise Evan. Nobody is foolish enough to agree with heavy handed Israeli tactics but your failure to acknowledge the hatred issuing from Iran is noteworthy. Let's see Alternet re-print some of Ahmadinejad's speeches, and not the PG style interview he gave with Brian Williams. What are you so afraid of? When will Alternet give both sides of the story? Does anyone here honestly doubt that Iran is trying to assemble a nuclear weapon? What was I thinking - of course you do.

I have absolutely no affinity for Christians, Jews or Muslims and would find their superstitious beliefs laughable if they weren't respsonsible for so much death and destruction. I think they're all insane but at least I'm able to see all sides of the story, not just Alternet's watered down, PC version of the Iranian wonderland and it's vision of peaceful coexistence. You have no credibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Iran - friend and ally . . . Posted by: mountainsrock
» RE: ad hominem attack by MAD Posted by: HeroesAll
Who is Hitler?
Posted by: citizenjoe on Nov 18, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Netanyahu divides the world into friends and enemies. His model of the enemy is the Nazi whose chief is Hitler.This, of course, is the Nazi view of friend and enemy (See the works of Carl Schmitt their legal theorist.) The conclusion follows that Nazis are those who take that view and that Netanayhu wants to be Hitler. So, who is Hitler-- Netanyahu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who is Hitler? Netanyahu! Posted by: symcokid
» RE: Who is Hitler? Netanyahu! Posted by: cottontail
Con artist and ambitious PM wannabe
Posted by: Doubtom on Nov 18, 2006 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The photo of Bibi Netanyahu shaking hands with Pat Robertson should tell us all we need to know about either of them. The world would be better off without these two. One is certifiably insane while the other is insatiably ambitious. It is in fact "Hitler" all rolled into one.

We need to cease this "special relationship" with Israel which no one can properly define, or tell us when it came into being and under what circumstances. Who decided that we had this "special relationship"? It certainly wasn't the American people.

Israel's "special ambassador" to our House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, states that there exists an "unbreakable bond" between our two nations. Who informed Pelosi of this? Was it Israel's representative, AIPAC?
Why does the bulk of our Senators and Representatives feel the need to genuflect towards Israel before doing their job? Who among them, was sent to Washington to represent Israel?

Now look closely at the composition of the new Congress and see who will be heading the very important Committees where all the work gets done. This should dispell the notion that there will be any change in the fiasco that is the Middle East. We will continue to have more of the same misery and terrorism until we can persuade our government that we're not joined at the hip with Israel regardless of how many jews with confused allegiances, we might have in our elected offices.

Stated plainly and simply, Israel's interests are not our interests and we need to stop sending our tax dollars annually to this rogue nation which is bent on stealing land and dispossesing the occupants. Israel is not a "victim" no matter how much effort anyone expends to sell that lie. It is an out of control nuclear power determined to expand its borders and determined as well, to drag the United States along in its criminal pursuits.
Time to cut the umbilical cord to this baby.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's simple Posted by: Burton
» RE: It's simple Posted by: HeroesAll
My Idiot Is Dumber Than Yours (All together Now)
Posted by: edith on Nov 18, 2006 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just want to highlight your excellent point that the clerics, for better or worse, have the strategic power in Iran, not Pres. A, who does sound like an idiot.

So Iran and the US both have idiots as President; the difference is that our idiot can push a nuclear button and theirs can't!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zionist Influence on Both Bush and Hitler - Chris Bollyn:
Posted by: rwa on Nov 18, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new "golden boy" of the Democrat Party, the Israeli-American congressman Rahm Emanuel, is the son of a terrorist.
Really, I am not making this up, the chief power-broker of the Democrat Party, the Israeli named Rahm, is the son of terrorist.
How can we respect a U.S. Congressman who served in a foreign army and whose father was a terrorist?
Rahm Emanuel, the Democrat congressman for the 5th District of Illinois in Chicago is the son of an Israeli terrorist. Rahm's father, Benjamin, was a member of the Irgun, the Zionist terrorist organization blew up hotels, train stations, and other buildings in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s.
Irgun was simply a terrorist Zionist group that operated in Palestine from 1931 to 1948. They killed innocent Palestinians and British soldiers and blew up buildings.
After 1948 they became part of the new Israeli government and did the same thing. In September 2001 they put their skills to work in Washington to kick start the "war on terror" - a conflict long promoted by their chief architect, Bibi Netanyahu, son of the former secretary of Ze'ev Jabotinsky.
The Irgun was considered a terrorist organization by the British authorities.
Guess who runs Israel today?
Answer: The sons and daughters of Irgun.
Guess who runs the United States today? The same people – let's start with Rahm Emanuel.
The late Sherman Skolnick of Chicago called Rahm Emanuel the "Acting Deputy Chief for North America of the Mossad – Israeli Intelligence."
Skolnick went on to say that Emanuel's father Benjamin had been "part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden's Count Bernadotte" in 1948. Bernadotte was the envoy of the United Nations in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews.
Rahm Emanuel's father's family came to Palestine from somewhere in the Ukraine in 1917, according to what Dr. Benjamin M. Emanuel told me the other day. Asked about his role in the Irgun, Ben told me he had been a "simple soldier."
Ben, serving as "simple soldier" in a terrorist organization makes you a terrorist. And the fact that you served in a terrorist organization 60 years ago makes no difference.
His father Ezekiel supposedly changed the family name to Emanuel when his son with that name died fighting Palestinians in 1936.
Before he terminated the conversation, Dr. Benjamin Auerbach-cum-Emanuel told me that he had been a member of the Irgun and had served under Menachem Begin. He told me that he had never met Begin and had not smuggled weapons into Palestine, other news reports notwithstanding.
Naftali Bendavid wrote a 9-page cover story for last Sunday's paper.
Naftali, at his office in Washington, knew all about Irgun when I spoke with him on the phone. When I said it was an egregious omission to leave out the fact that Rahm's father had been in the Irgun, he said he just couldn't figure how to squeeze that bit into a 9-page article.
It would, however, be most interesting if Rahm's father were actually related to Moshe Auerbach, the Zionist who went to Berlin with Pino Ginzburg to arrange the transfer of Jews and money to Palestine – with the Nazi regime.
On February 28 1937, Feivel Polkes, head of the Haganah told Adolf Eichmann that he was interested most of all in "accelerating Jewish migration to Palestine so that the Jews would obtain a majority over the Arabs in his country."
In The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany -1933-1941 by Klaus Polkehn, he revealed that collaboration between the Zionists and the Third Reich was cemented by the "Mossad Aliyah Beth" which had been created by Haganah as an illegal immigration organization. Pina Ginsburg and Moshe Auerbach, with the blessings of the Reich, set up offices in Berlin to carry out their immigration activities in 1938.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey raghead Posted by: rwa
» RE: Hey raghead Posted by: MAD
» Bigot is way too nice Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: Bigot is way too nice Posted by: Burton
» The Grand Mufti? Posted by: citizenjoe
ISRAELI ZIONISTS HAVE TOO MUCH POWER
Posted by: AlohaTerry on Nov 18, 2006 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Certain elements of the Zionists are making Israel look like the Fourth Reich!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Statistically speaking.....
Posted by: Basenjis on Nov 18, 2006 4:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I understand it, a rather high percentage of the world's population suffers from some kind of mental disfunction or aberration. Are world leaders exempt?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You know you've read it...
Posted by: Burton on Nov 19, 2006 2:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm curious. How people here have read "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"? It is quite popular among the pro-Palestinian crowd in the Middle East. Judging by the fulminations against the Zionist Conspiracy, I'd say it is quite popular among many so-called progressives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You know you've read it... Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: You know you've read it... Posted by: HeroesAll
CIA analysis finds no Iranian nuclear weapons drive: report
Posted by: rwa on Nov 19, 2006 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By Agence France-Presse

11/19/06 "AFP"-- -- WASHINGTON - A classified draft CIA assessment has found no firm evidence of a secret drive by Iran to develop nuclear weapons, as alleged by the White House, a top US investigative reporter said on Saturday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From EVAN
Posted by: PEEK on Nov 19, 2006 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How could I forget my lessons?

For those who need it stated explicitly, Ahmadinejad is an ass whose incendiary anti-Israel rhetoric is deplorable. Jesus, if anyone thinks this Jew isn't pissed at the content of Ahmadinejad's rhetoric they're living in an igloo.

But the POINT of the post is that nobody should be afraid of him. Reason? He's impotent, in the truest sense of the word. He doesn't control the means to harm Israel, were the means to harm Israel even at Iran's disposal, which they aren't.

Also, please note: Iran, as a nation, is not especial hostile toward Jews. They live there and they live good lives there.

I'm not hopping a Delta to Tehran tomorrow but if the Jews of Iran are to be believed, they enjoy many rights and respect, and most wouldn't leave if you offered them the chance.

Argue about whatever you like, but know this: Iran does not threaten Israel or the world's Jewry. It threatens the sensibilities of demented neocons and their mouth-breathing followers and those who keep the flame of the SS burning bright in their wildest nightmares.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Onya, Evan, you tell 'em! Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Onya, Evan, you tell 'em! Posted by: HeroesAll
Netanyau -- the real Hitler and as bad as Cheney
Posted by: paul_revere on Nov 20, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was many years ago when I was a teenager that CNN first started CROSSFIRE on their channel. I remember seeing Benjamin Netanyau debating the Palestinian issue and promoting the Israeli settlements. From what I gathered, even at that age, I could tell that this malicious character was one of the most evil men in the world. He is an arrogant asshole, a warmonger and a zealous Zionist. From his point of view, it doesn't matter who or how many people die, as long as Israel can expand its territory and purge its population of non-Jews. This guy is the real Hitler. He has operated behind the scene during every Israeli administration and constantly thwarts every attempt to make peace with the Palestinians.

Oh, God, how I wish I was a Senator at the time he slimed the Senate floor when he flew to the USA and attempted to lecture OUR Senators during those days when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict became inflamed again (right after Bush was selected). I would have bitch-slapped him silly and dragged his sorry ass off the Senate floor.

I can't wait until he leaves the planet. He's a cancer on humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War Mongering for Israel
Posted by: rwa on Nov 20, 2006 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim Lobe:
Shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States, an influential, neoconservative-led pressure group called the Project for the New American Century issued a letter to the president calling for a dramatic reshaping of the Middle East as part of the war on terror. Many of the items on the neoconservatives' agenda, including ousting Saddam Hussein, were eventually adopted by the George W. Bush administration...
On September 20, 2001, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), located in the same building as the better-known American Enterprise Institute (AEI), published an open letter to President George W. Bush advocating a number of steps the administration should take in its newly proclaimed “war on terrorism.” The letter, published in the Washington Times and the Weekly Standard, urged military action to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan and to “capture or kill” Osama bin Laden, both recommendations widely supported by virtually all U.S. political leaders.

But the group's suggestions did not stop there—in fact, PNAC had an ambitious number of additional targets in mind, which had little or no connection to the actual terrorist attacks. Most notoriously, the letter called for regime change in Iraq, “even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack.” The letter also proposed taking “appropriate measures of retaliation” against Iran and Syria if they refused to comply with U.S. demands to cut off support for Lebanon's Hezbollah; argued that Washington should cut off aid to the Palestinian Authority... and called for a “large increase” in defense spending to prosecute the war on terror. Some of the letter's signers—notably, former CIA director James Woolsey and editor-at-large of the neoconservative Commentary magazine Norman Podhoretz—were soon calling this new war “World War IV.” Supporting this breath-taking agenda were nearly 40 other influential policy elites and public figures. The group consisted of mostly neoconservatives, but also included a leader of the Christian Right, and some pro-Israel liberal interventionists associated with the Democratic Party.

A little over six months later, PNAC released a follow-up letter on April 3, 2002. This second letter focused largely on U.S. policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The letter urged George W. Bush to sever all ties with the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Said the letter: “Mr. President, it can no longer be the policy of the United States to urge, much less to pressure, Israel to continue negotiating with Arafat...” It added: “Israel's fight against terrorism is our fight. Israel's victory is an important part of our victory.” For good measure, the letter reiterated PNAC's call “for removing Saddam Hussein from power.”

A little over a year after the publication of these letters, PNAC's agenda seemed to be rapidly advancing. Bush administration in June 2002 reversed long-standing U.S. policy and severed all contact with the PLO. Washington, in effect, was aligning itself fully behind the Likud government in Israel.

By early April 2003, the U.S. military had conquered Baghdad. On May 1, 2003, Bush declared the end of major hostilities in Iraq in his memorable “Mission Accomplished” speech. Senior administration officials and their neoconservative associates at the AEI, PNAC, and elsewhere soon began publicly warning that Syria and Iran were next on their list. “The liberation of Iraq was the first great battle for the future of the Middle East,” wrote Kristol in the Standard “The next great battle will be for Iran." Within two weeks, the administration had spurned an unprecedented offer from Iran to negotiate all outstanding differences between the two nations, including its nuclear program and its support for armed anti-Israel groups, in exchange for security guarantees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

feeling lucky?
Posted by: aaron_capricorn on Nov 20, 2006 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go to www.google.com and type in 'holocaust truth' and click 'feeling lucky?'. Revelations chapter 2 vs 9, revelations chapter 3 verse 9.
PEACE or annihilation
trut or consuquences
infinite love;everything else is an illusion

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]