Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Public school teacher gives lesson in right-wing Christian Tolerance®

Posted by Joshua Holland at 7:04 AM on November 14, 2006.


Joshua Holland: Another martyr is born.
whokids
kids

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

From the Lippard Blog, via Pharyngula:

A history teacher at the local public high school [in Kearny, New Jersey] may have bitten off more than he cares to chew this fall. Self-described conservative Baptist David Paszkiewicz used his history class to proselytize biblical fundamentalism over the course of several days at the beginning of this school year.
Among his remarks in open class were statements that a being must have created the universe, that the Christian Bible is the word of God, and that dinosaurs were aboard Noah's ark. If you do not accept Jesus, he flatly proclaimed to his class, "you belong in hell." Referring to a Muslim student who had been mentioned by name, he lamented what he saw as her inevitable fate should she not convert. In an attempt to promote biblical creationism, he also dismissed evolution and the Big Bang as non-scientific, arguing by contrast that the Bible is supported by what he calls confirmed biblical prophecies.

After taking the matter to the school administration, one of Paszkiewicz's students, junior Matthew LaClair, requested a meeting with the teacher and the school principal. LaClair, a non-Christian, was requesting an apology and correction of false and anti-scientific statements. After two weeks, a meeting took place in the principal's office, wherein Paszkiewicz denied making many of these comments, claiming that LaClair had taken his remarks out of context. Paszkiewicz specifically denied using the phrase, "you belong in hell." He also asserted that he did nothing different in this class than he has been doing in fifteen years of teaching.
Here's the sweet part…
At the end of the meeting, LaClair revealed that he had recorded the remarks, and presented the principal with two compact discs.
Curses! Foiled by modern science!
The teacher then declined to comment further without his union representative. However, he fired one last shot at the student, saying, "You got the big fish … you got the big Christian guy who is a teacher…!"
This guy will certainly go down as a martyr to the ACLU's insipid political correctness -- another good Christian oppressed by evil secularists.
No apology has been forthcoming from the teacher or from the school. The parents state that because of the administration's inaction, they have taken the matter to the school board this week, from whom they are awaiting a response.
Apparently, this Matt LaClair is a pretty cool kid -- last year he made an impassioned defense of his refusal to stand for the pledge of allegiance:
When I sit out the McCarthy-era version of the Pledge, it is not because I do not care about, respect or love my country. Just the opposite, it is because I do.
Our country has taken many dangerous turns lately. We have given away many of our freedoms through the so-called Patriot Act. Radical elements threaten to turn our democracy into a theocracy. Groups the majority does not understand, like homosexuals, intellectuals and liberals, are regularly treated with scorn, contempt and disrespect.[…]
I do not sit because standing is too hard, or because reciting the Pledge takes too long. It would be much easier to stand and not have people telling me I am "unpatriotic," a Communist, or spitting on America. Most of these comments have not been made by students, but teachers and staff members, the adults who are supposed to be teaching us citizenship! Standing would indeed be a small act. Sitting is the big one.
I guess the kids are alright after all.

PS: One or more of you just read, on some right-wing blog, about a Muslim schoolteacher in Tashkent who told his class something equally offensive. You are about to write in the comments that my failure to cover that important story proves once and for all that I am hateful and abusive towards all Christians (despite the fact that Mr. Paszkiewicz is clearly a nut-job who represents a tiny minority thereof).

Don't do it! Why? Because …

  • I don't live in Uzbekistan
  • I don't pay taxes in Uzbekistan, nor would I send my children to an Uzbekistani school if I had any
  • I have no clue whether the Uzbekistani Constitution guarantees the separation of church and state, but ours does
  • On a very fundamental level, I don't care what people say in Tashkent
  • I am not the AP or Reuters and make no claim to covering everything that you might find interesting -- only what I do
  • If you see a story about a Muslim teacher in an American public school trying to similarly indoctrinate his or her students, e-mail it to me and I guarantee I will receive the news with equal offense and snarky opprobrium

Digg!

Tagged as: religious right

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Why Is Obama Caving to Fox?
"President Obama will give an interview to Fox News' Major Garrett, Drudge reports."
Post by Adam Bink. November 12, 2009.
Breast Flaunting for Jesus
The life of a failed California beauty pageant contestant gets even weirder.
Post by Thers. November 11, 2009.
Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hey, Josh
Posted by: HeroesAll on Nov 13, 2006 8:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I demand that you be offensive to all, regardless of race, creed, colour, political views, employment status, or favourite song.

Except you can't criticise (a) Christians and (b)Israel. Regardless of what they may or may not do. God said so.

Love,
Christian nutcase

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Legal requirement Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Hey, Josh Posted by: euchler
» RE: Hey, Josh Posted by: COC
» Dont break your arm Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» RE: Dont break your arm Posted by: Joshua Holland
No wonder Elton John complains about *religion* and hate.
Posted by: Sojourner on Nov 13, 2006 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My response to Elton John would be, if it is hate, then it is not religion. But this public school teacher is an example of what Elton John is talking about.

Still, for me there's a big difference between self-righteousness and religion. Religion is about service and sacrifice, not about indoctrination. When I was young and learned that, I assumed that by the time I reached my current ripe old age, everyone would see the difference--or at least more people would.

Have to keep on truckin' on that one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No wonder... Posted by: grumble-bum
Activate the real WMDs
Posted by: eddie torres on Nov 14, 2006 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story evokes a sense of "White Male Despondency" that, although not directly related to the results of Nov 7, may begin to occur with more frequency.

I will keep my eyes peeled for similar episodes, characterised by rogue disenfranchised fanatics on day release from megachurch (or the Southern Baptist Convention). They have nothing to gain from science and reason, and everything to gain from the Rapture and Armageddon.

Ironic that while history is rife with lessons about the legacy costs of a single party state, the losers never go quietly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

he obviously never will be a politician
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Nov 14, 2006 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm in awe of this young man, and only wish I'd had a smidgen of his wisdom and courage at that age--hell, at this age.

Would that we had more people like him, and that some of them would go into public service.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about madrassas?
Posted by: medstudgeek on Nov 14, 2006 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know how many there are in America, but there are apparently quite a few in Europe, and it's contributing to their problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about madrassas? Posted by: particle
» We have a winner ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: We have a winner ... Posted by: amatullah
» RE: What about madrassas? Posted by: icemilkcoffee
PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER AND TOLERANCE
Posted by: Schnieder on Nov 14, 2006 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are many problems in this country at this time with religion being used in inappropriate ways. The Air Force Academy is one. There are others.
My late husband spent his final years in a VA nursing home. Each month there was a patient review. In attendance would be the patient, family member or members, doctor or PA, nurses and others responsible for his care. As time progressed a chaplain was included. On one occasion I was subjected to the religious hard sell. I was a captive.
A couple of years later I entered a county hospital for a wire biospy on a breast. At admittance I was asked for religious preference. I responded none. There was no problem at that point. When I reached the area of the hospital where the biopsy was to be performed a nurse noted I had indicated no religious preferance. At that point everything came to a halt while I was subjected to the hard sell. Again, I was a captive.

I am of the opinion enough is enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Noncompliant Posted by: Michael Robin
» RE: Noncompliant Posted by: amatullah
frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Nov 14, 2006 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The wingnuts strike again! I'm glad that kid recorded the teacher's nutty diatribe. The school board needs to clean house. That regime must go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the shot at the ACLU?
Posted by: brunowe on Nov 14, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy will certainly go down as a martyr to the ACLU's insipid political correctness -- another good Christian oppressed by evil secularists.

Do you know of instances of the ACLU defending the right of teachers to proselytize in class?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why the shot at the ACLU? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Why the shot at the ACLU?--josh Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Of course not! Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Of course not! Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Why the shot at the ACLU? Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: Why the shot at the ACLU? Posted by: Mamarianne
Matt LaClair...
Posted by: TheNamelessCity on Nov 14, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is one COOL, SMART GUY!!!
My big problem with the pledge is the mention of the magical man in the sky, and I will never say the pledge again until the mythical beast mention is removed from it. I happily scratch the offensive "in *** we trust" from each bill of US currency that I get, and write NO THEOCRACY in its place. I urge all who disbelieve in mythical beings to do the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Matt LaClair... Posted by: icemilkcoffee
» RE: Matt LaClair... Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» RE: Matt LaClair... Posted by: Paul Cardwell
Something good . .
Posted by: sweetmorganlefey on Nov 15, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like one student in the class understands what for what the Consitution stands. Congratulations to the young man for having the courage to respond. Being a teen is hard, peer groups are so important that being an individual takes a back seat. This teen is a thinking acting citizen and is to be thanked for his courage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Something good . . Posted by: mdruss42
WHO IS THE HISTORY TEACHER, OR CIVICS,IN THIS SCHOOL
Posted by: mdruss42 on Nov 15, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SOMEBODY SLIPPED UP AND TAUGHT MAT SOME HISTORY THAT I WAS NEVER TAUGHT IN SCHOOL EVEN 50 YEARS AGO IN THE SUPPOSED AGE WHEN WE WERE THIS GREAT COUNTRY.

IT IS LIKE FINDING A GEM AMONG ROCKS, THOUGH, LIKE THE YOUNG BOY WHO WORKED IN THE SAME OFFICE WITH ME IN MY LAST JOB, BEFORE I HAD HAD ALL THE FUN AND GOOD LIFE I COULD STAND AND RETIRED. HE WAS FROM ARKANSAS AND HAD A VERY COUNTRY ACCENT, SO WAS PRECEIVED TO BE A RUBE AND PROBABLY NOT BRIGHT. I NOTICED HIM READING DURING A SLOW PERIOD AND ASKED WHAT HE WAS READING.......NOAM CHOMSKY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sooner or later YOU might need the ACLU
Posted by: Mamarianne on Nov 15, 2006 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's parse those words: American (still stands for a nationality that is comparatively more free and more just), Civil (like, uh, polite...but also a word that means relating to citizens), Liberties (isn't that the founding principle of this nation?), and Union (as in what Ben Franklin said about if we don't stand together, we will surely hang separately). Gee, where's the argument? Sooner or later, almost every American needs the ACLU to stand against up infringement of a right to do something that, while unpopular, is protected by our great consistution. With the current Bush policies still in effect, Americans need the ACLU now perhaps more than ever. We may not like every expression of liberty that the ACLU strives to protect, but we certainly love the liberty of free expression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Separation of Church and State
Posted by: JMM on Nov 15, 2006 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What’s important about this article is not the case that it mentions, for that is just an example of an ill-intentioned Christian whose beliefs and prejudice spoutings are not characteristic of the religious whole. He is an extremist. What is important here though is the notion of separation of church and state, something that within recent years has become a major issue in the United States. What beliefs, if any, can be enforced upon the public as a whole? How does religion influence morality and therefore, also our country’s social issues? Should religious beliefs be able to influence law and national policy?

The separation of church and state is an idea that is central to the way our government is meant to be run: free from prejudice and applicable and fair to people of all races, colors, religions, genders, sexualities, etc. While I understand that such prejudices are certainly still prevalent, there is a common belief that they should not exist under the law. Yet, there seems to be loop-holes for religion disguised as moral propriety.

One man can believe that those who do not accept Jesus Christ as their savior are going to hell while another can refute that God even exists. Hell, one might even worship the devil…whatever their moral preference may be, they are entitled to their own beliefs. It is a basic, fundamental, American liberty. And not one to be taken for granted.

What the teacher did in this case is an extreme example of trying to indoctrinate the youth of today with his own Christian beliefs. In fact, this is the combination of church and state in perhaps its worst form. He is using a position of authority to enforce a particular belief upon his students, neglecting the diversity in the room. He is using his influence over them not to educate with partial, factual information, but to breed perpetuators of his own beliefs. This is, without question or debate, wrong. It is never right to tell a student that he or she, because of her religious upbringing will “go to hell.” He more closely resembles a madman than a teacher of any kind.

Where the issues of church and state become more intricate, are in issues such as a becoming intertwined with thoughts on abortion, reciting the pledge of allegiance, the use of the word God, etc. I recently saw a webpage produced by the ADF (Alliance Defense Fund) that said “separation of church and state is found nowhere in the United States Constitution or any founding document of this nation.” They seem to support religion having a great influence on politics, yet they say “the intention of the founding fathers is that religious faith should be encouraged, rather than discouraged” as their only form of support. How, with a country of such diversity, do we establish which religious beliefs should have influence, and which should not. Even if not found in the original documents, “separation of church and state” is an ideal we have come to accept as our diversity is unquestionable. Some argue that it exists while others, like myself, argue that it frequently does not. Our country was founded by people escaping religious persecution. I find it hard to believe that in the form of a flagrant teacher or biased law, they would want people of our time to endure the same hardship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A little more than that ... Posted by: AdamSelene40