Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Was Republican corruption the tipping point?

Posted by Don Hazen at 8:10 AM on November 13, 2006.


Don Hazen: Forget conventional wisdom for a moment and look at the numbers...

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The highly competitive post election spin battle over which constituency or issue was truly the tipping point for the smashing Democratic victory on November 7th continues unabated. Pundits and experts offer their analysis and theories, while exit polls are wrung out for their secret truths.

The issues most credited for the Republican demise are (a.) unhappiness with the results of the U.S. occupation of Iraq, and (b.) populist economic messages, particularly concern for the impact of international trade policies. These two issues are considered the paradigm shifters for many voters. But I want to make a case for the underdog in this race for issue supremacy: Republican corruption.

Let's go back and take a look at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) report on the Twenty Most Corrupt Members of Congress, released in September of 2006. Entitled "Beyond DeLay: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and five to watch)," the report documents the "egregious, unethical and possibly illegal activities of the most tainted members of the 109th Congress..." with transgressions "analyzed in light of federal laws and congressional rules."

The report names only three Senators, all Republicans -- Santorum, Frist, and Burns. In this election, Rick Santorum, the number 3 ranking Republican from Pennsylvania, got whacked by 20 points by Bob Casey, while Conrad Burns got nipped by Jon Tester, the crew-cut farmer populist in Montana. Frist was not up for election, so the corruption batting average on the Senate was 1,000.

On the House side, one of the surprises of election day was the Dems. ability to knock off 6 members from the CREW list of most corrupt House members, virtually all powerfully entrenched Republicans, A number of those defeated couldn't escape the stain spread by corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who was convicted of three felonies for self-enrichment. Those Republicans knocked off included seven term Congressman Richard Pombo in California, four-termer John Sweeney from New York, seven-termer Curt Weldon in Pennsylvania, J.D. Hayworth of Arizona (under investigation for his Abramoff relationship), and Don Sherwood in Pennsylvania, made infamous for allegedly choking his mistress who called the police-- and with whom he settled a lawsuit, with a non-disclosure clause.

In addition to the six Republican incumbents knocked out, the infamous Katherine Harris, who was on the CREW list, was thumped by Florida Democrat Bill Nelson 60-38, as she reached much too far in running for the Senate. One of four Democrats on the CREW list William Jefferson of Louisiana, is in a run off scheduled for December 9th with Karen Carter, after only receiving 30% of the vote. Among eleven candidates, Carter came in second with 22%, and Jefferson isn't seen as the favorite against Carter.

One from the list, Republican Gary Miller, ran unopposed, while progressive LA Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who is on the list for enriching family members, was essentially unopposed, winning 84% of the vote.

So overall, the House batting average for kicking out corrupt incumbents was .400: eight victories out of twenty in head-to-head campaigns-- which, given the odds, is a very good number. The impact of these victories is significant, and in a number of them, due to gerrymandering and long term incumbency, Democratic challengers were given little chance until late in the campaign.

Also, these results do not account for, as the CREW report notes:

"[T]he careers of three members which ended as a result of corruption: former Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) indicted in Texas and facing possible federal indictment in the Jack Abramoff scandal; Rep. Randy 'Duke' Cunningham is now serving an eight-year jail term for bribery and Rep. Bob Ney has agreed to plead to guilty to crimes that will likely result in a minimum two-year prison term. In addition, several other members, including Reps. William Jefferson, Alan Mollohan and Jerry Lewis, and Sens. Conrad Burns and Bill Frist are also under federal investigation."

And in a possible portent for the future, there were a couple of close races against other Republican incumbents on the list -- particularly in California's Gold Country, where Charley Brown barely lost to eight-termer John Doolittle by 7,529 votes or 3%, and Angie Paccione in Colorado who lost to Marilyn Musgrove by 7,106 votes, or 3%.

All in all, the public seems to clearly respond to Democratic advertising which effectively framed the "pay-to-play" philosophy underlining much of the Republican Party's activities as a strong negative. In addition, efforts by groups like Public Campaign Action Fund to keep the corruption message percolating had an impact.

The head of CREW, Melanie Sloan stated:

"The officials named in this report have chosen to enrich themselves and their families and friends by abusing the power of their office, rather than work for the public good. Their collective corruption affects all Americans."

In that light, it is interesting that John Murtha, who is running for House Majority leader -- and in staking out a tough anti-war stance became a darling of the progressives -- is considered one of the 22 most corrupt members of the House by CREW.

CREW's research on Murtha documents that Murtha's son went to work for KSA Consulting, a firm that lobbies the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee on behalf of defense contractors. In 2004, Congress passed a $417 billion defense appropriations bill that went through Rep. Murtha's subcommittee. The bill benefited at least 10 companies represented by KSA and KSA directly lobbied Rep. Murtha's office on behalf of seven of those companies, which received a total $20.8 million in earmarks.

One wonders what impact Murtha's role as an "earmarks" pork barrel dealer will have on his future efforts to gain a House leadership role. Will the Dems look for a "Mr. Clean," or will Murtha, or corporate Democrat Steny Hoyer, another leading candidate, get the job? Stay tuned.

Digg!

Tagged as: corruption, election06, santorum, abramoff, tester, murtha, delay, burns, casey, crew

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Forget the Spin
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 13, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you took a poll and included "Crooked Politicians" as one of the options, it would probably be top of the list for anyone who was actually being honest...

So, to answer your question, "HELL YES!" This congress is the Biggest Bunch of Crooks I've ever seen in my life and I hope "The Waxman" (i.e. Henry Waxman) Waxes the hell out of them through ongoing investigations which know no boundaries...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Modest Proposal?
Posted by: Xynyx on Nov 13, 2006 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to offer the suggestion that our federal statutes be revised so that Subversion of Democracy (including bribery, election fraud, and influence peddling) is a capital offense. We should decide, as a nation, to put to death any politicians or corrupt businessmen or others who undermine the very foundation (in principle) of our government.

This could help us achieve one or two things:

1. It might end capital punishment, because I suspect the rich white men would think that the death penalty was far too radical and inappropriate for their crimes... it's fine for you scum on the streets, but we that ride around in limousines can be rehabilitated with a slap on the wrists.

2. It might end corruption (or at least go some distance toward doing so...).

If this act does not accomplish task #1, it would speak volumes for the ineffectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent.

So let's all support the use of capital punishment for our corrupt politicians. We stand only to gain from it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Much Money Should Be Spent Investigating?
Posted by: eddie torres on Nov 13, 2006 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before a new class of American political pigs arrives in Washington ready to wallow in the federal trough, perhaps you progressives should play like adults for 10 minutes and peg an acceptable dollar figure to the Congressional and Justice Department budgets for fraud and corruption investigations.

Do you know how much it costs to get a serving, elected politician (Cunningham) or a private government contractor (Custer Battles) up in front of a judge for final sentencing?

Look before you leap. Many of your Congressional leaders already know that the threat of investigations may be more useful than the cost of actually carrying them out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corruption a BIG player in the election
Posted by: Bozwell on Nov 14, 2006 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The CORRUPTION factor was indeed a MAJOR consideration and the old adage that "absolute power corrupts absolutely" got played out to the hilt with the GOP holding all branches...Folks were fed up, and many beut did hold nose and vote Dem JUST to get a break from the GOP stench !! The war is NOT favored, and general INCOMPETENCE are major factors as well but the tipping point was the GLARE of HYPOCRISY in regards to so very, VERY much !!!! The Dems BEST demand of their members adherence to strict guidlines and as for investigations and what perhaps cost, allowing the feeding frenzy by elected is costing us all far more and benefits but few so spend those dollars and hold the elected accountable and responsible for they have indeed shafted the citizenry far too long wasting the tax dollars to benefit the few while needs of the citizenry get slashed, cut, and ignorred. The voters attempted to send a message...hope the Dems are listening up too...Face it, this vote just squeeked in to give the Dems majority, it was not due to overwhelming trust that they are not without sins of their own. Time to get the electeds held accountable to demand they SERVE THE PEOPLE greater common good NOT just the special interests and corporates and their own personal pockets.(hear them bemoan how tuff it is for them to get by on their $165,000 plus generous pension/healthcare and other benefits and make a comparison to what the AVERAGE ORDINARY CITIZEN scrapes on by with and WITHOUT...time for some parity!!!! And yes, once they give up PUBLIC OFFICE< they march over into the PRIVATE SECTOR at lucrative wages/benefits ONLY DUE TO THEIR DC CONNECTIONS of which is felt they will be able to continue to tap !!!! Tired of hearing how if in private sector they would have been more amply rewarded...HAH !!! That is another spin that deserves discrediting for not all would have ever achieved power positions in the private sector if NOT for the CONNECTIONS TO DC . the aerage citizen has NO such benefit !!!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]