Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Updated: Why Lieberman won't replace Rummy …

Posted by Joshua Holland at 2:00 PM on November 10, 2006.


Joshua Holland: It's a tempting theory, but I don't see it.
lapdog
lieberpuppy

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Like many others, when I realized what a tough confirmation Secretary of Defense nominee Robert Gates will -- or at least should -- have coming, I wondered if there wasn't an ulterior motive for the pick. And, also like many others, it occurred to me that if Gates' confirmation were killed, it would allow Bush to nominate Joe Lieberman, who might then take the job reluctantly, for the "good of the country" -- Joe's independent minded, you know, and always puts country ahead of party -- and that would give Connecticut's Republican governor Jodi Rell the opportunity to pick a replacement and swing the Senate to a 50-50 split with Darth Cheney representing the tie-breaking vote. The scenario has been a hot topic of speculation in so many of the Internet's tubes this week, including among our commenters.

But after thinking about it a bit, and discussing it behind the scenes with some of the other insightful writers around here, I think that's pretty darn unlikely for several reasons.

All of them boil down to the fact that while Holy Joe is a craven opportunist, a self-loathing Dem and a dedicated militarist, he's not stupid. He also has a big ego, and, like everyone in politics, wants as much power as possible.

The last two are why he'd never take the job -- or at least he'd need to be very stupid to do so. Consider:

  • He'd be giving up a six-year Senate gig for a two-year cabinet position under a lame-duck president who at this point doesn't enjoy much support from legislators in either party.
  • He'd be giving up a uniquely powerful Senate seat, the ultimate swing vote and the guy to whom everyone will have to kowtow.
  • He'd be swapping that seat for job that he knows full well will be under the microscope in the next Congress. Whoever becomes the next SecDef is going to have one of the crappiest jobs in DC, spending much of his or her time fending off subpoenas, dodging questions from the press and testifying before pissed off legislators who want to distance themselves from their own votes for the Iraq war by tearing into the administration's most prominent representative on the issue.
  • People with big egos want to be liked (I). Joe knows that his support for the War in Iraq hurt him with Connecticut voters -- hence his flip-flop during the campaign when he suddenly tried to morph into an anti-war candidate. Serving two years as GWB's SecDef as Iraq slips into further chaos would cement his legacy for all eternity as the Democrat who Supported Bush's Disastrous War More Fervently Than any Other. Nobody would even remember that he was the Veep nominee in 2000.
  • People with big egos want to be liked (II). When Jim Jeffords flipped parties in 2001, he gave the Senate to the Dems and was hailed a hero in his deep "blue" home state of Vermont. Connecticut is just as Democratic, and Bush is ten times more unpopular than he was at that time. Connecticut voters would forever remember Joe as the guy who turned the Senate over to the GOP just after they expressed their hatred for Bush and his Congress at the polls. There'd be no hero's welcome back in New Haven, and Joe knows it.
  • People with big egos want to be liked (III). Joe doesn't feel much obligation to the voters -- they're common rabble, after all -- but I imagine he cares quite a bit about how people view him within the power circles in which he travels. He cut a deal with Democratic leaders behind the scenes: in exchange for his support if he won, they'd offer Ned Lamont, the Dem nominee, only the most tepid possible support. I doubt he wants to be seen as a traitor among the DC cocktail party crowd.


Anyway, having made those last three points, let me say that I wouldn't die of shock if he simply switched parties, citing the destructive anti-Americanism of the Dems' left wing that Fox News' hosts always talk about. But he wouldn't take the worst job in Washington to swing the Senate just out of spite.

UPDATE: AP:
In an e-mail message late Thursday, Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein said the senator will begin his new term as a Democrat.
With the Democratic takeover of the Senate, Lieberman is in line to become chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
In a post-election news conference, Lieberman said he was reassured by Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid that he would retain his seniority when the new Senate convenes.

Digg!

Tagged as: lieberman, senate, election06, rumsfeld, gates

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


GOP's New Prayer Guru Says Gays Possessed By Demons
Lou Engle has led GOP Senators in nationally broadcast prayer and anointed Huckabee and Gingrich
Post by Bruce Wilson. December 19, 2009.
The Violent Repression of Peaceful Palestinian Protests Continues
8,000 Palestinians currently inhabit Israeli jails on purely political grounds.
Post by Jonathan Pollak. December 19, 2009.
Senate Reaches 60 Votes for Health Bill
Nelson's on board, for now ...
Post by Igor Volsky. December 19, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?