Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Are the Moonies and Japan headed for a new Clash of Civilizations?

Posted by Joshua Holland at 12:48 PM on November 4, 2006.


Joshua Holland: And will our seas survive the predations of a messianic right-wing "King of the Oceans"?
mooncrowned
moon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Let's put three stories about seafood -- two new and one old but not well known -- together and see what shakes out.

I'm a huge sushi fan (all left-gatekeepers drink latté and eat sushi) so I was troubled, to say the least, to learn that every time I bite into a deliciously slimy bit of uni I am, in all likelihood, throwing money at wacky cultist and right-wing propagandist Sun Myung Moon:

In a remarkable story that has gone largely untold, Moon and his followers created an enterprise that reaped millions of dollars by dominating one of America's trendiest indulgences: sushi.

Adhering to a plan Moon spelled out more than three decades ago in a series of sermons, members of his movement managed to integrate virtually every facet of the highly competitive seafood industry. The Moon followers' seafood operation is driven by a commercial powerhouse, known as True World Group. It builds fleets of boats, runs dozens of distribution centers and, each day, supplies most of the nation's estimated 9,000 sushi restaurants.

Although few seafood lovers may consider they're indirectly supporting Moon's religious movement, they do just that when they eat a buttery slice of tuna or munch on a morsel of eel in many restaurants. True World is so ubiquitous that 14 of 17 prominent Chicago sushi restaurants surveyed by the Tribune said they were supplied by the company.

So, yeah, that's how the Moonies can lose millions on the reactionary Washington Times and the rest of the Rev's media empire. Can't you just see the Reverend with Mini-Moon, pinkies to their lips, cackling madly at this modest bit of global domination?

Anyway, I thought about the Moonies' cornering the sushi market -- in addition to the fishing fleet and the distribution biz, Moonies own hundreds if not thousands of sushi joints -- when I read, in The Independent, that the Japanese are not all that happy about how their culinary heritage is being presented abroad, and they're fixing to do something about it:

'Sushi police' to protect Japan's culinary exports

Next time you pick up that succulent tuna roll or steaming bowl of miso soup, look behind you: the sushi police may be on the prowl.

Long irritated by the sometimes dire quality of Japanese food on offer outside its home country, Tokyo's culinary guardians may be about to launch a crackdown - and sushi is likely to be top of their hit-list.

Japan's Agriculture Ministry has set up a panel to discuss a certification system for Japanese restaurants abroad. Possible gastronomic crimes include slicing fish too thick, using too little or too much wasabi and overboiling rice. Japanese tourists have also been known to complain about greasy tempura, floppy, lifeless noodles and seaweed that is not crispy enough.[…]

I'm really with them when it comes to greasy tempura.

"Partly this move is for Japanese tourists but the government wants to export fish-eating culture and techniques to other parts of the world," said Yasuyuki Saito, a journalist with the Daily Fisheries News.

That all seems very Japanese to me. And if we can forgive them for inventing the repellent surimi, the principle ingredient in Krablegs* with a "k," then it is a rich culinary tradition indeed.

It'll be interesting to see whether Japan's certification system and the Rev's sushi empire end up butting heads. There may be millions of ripe suckers around the world who buy that Moon is some kind of Godly "spiritual leader" -- among his many claims, he says he's channeled the ghosts of Hitler and Mussolini and cured their "sickness" -- but at the end of the day, he's just another crazy right-wing corporatist billionaire with a decidedly anti-regulatory bent. (In the early stages of his sushi … er … plot, Moon married hundreds of Japanese fishermen to American wives so they could gain citizenship and fish legally within the U.S.'s 200-mile "exclusive economic zone.") I can't see him taking kindly to Japanese attempts to regulate -- even on a voluntary basis -- businesses outside of Japan.

And whether or not there's a clash in the offing, it doesn't appear that the world's oceans can withstand seafood being even more heavily promoted by the Moonies' global fishing operation (they're now expanding into Europe) and the Japanese Agriculture Ministry. While the Japanese have long been leaders in forestry management, they are, as any minke whale or finless shark can tell you, the sweaty, 240-pound serial rapists of the oceans.

And the world's fisheries aren't going to be around for much longer if we continue to indulge in our passion for seafood. At least that's what a group of researchers reported this week in the journal Science:

There will be no more commercial fishing in 40 years if the present levels of fishing continue around the world, leading marine scientists are warning …

A new analysis of world fisheries, which took four years to compile, concludes that by 2048 stocks of all of the species currently fished for food will collapse to less than 10 per cent of the maximum catches recorded.

That would make fishing impossible, and render stocks unlikely to recover.

The scientists - who report their work in Friday's edition of the journal Science - said that overfishing was accelerating, and stocks as a result were declining more rapidly.

Nicola Beaumont, co-author of the report and an ecological economist at Plymouth Marine Laboratory in the UK, said: "We must take action now. If we leave this for 10 or 20 years we will reach the point of no recovery for fisheries. […]

The overfishing of one species of fish has knock-on effects on others, and reduces the resilience of the ocean eco-system and its ability to recover stocks.

This means the loss of a single overfished species, such as cod or tuna, could have wide-ranging effects on many other seemingly unrelated fish species.

"The oceans have all these moving parts and if you start removing parts, you get a breakdown," Ms Beaumont said.

However, the report found that in some areas where fishing was restricted in order to allow stocks to recover, fisheries could return to healthy levels within as little as three to five years. But in areas where overfishing had continued too long, no such recovery was possible.

We are a pretty dumb species, and don't tend to take the long view. I think I'll try to stick to farmed fish whenever I can.

*The Japanese have been eating processed surimi-based products, traditionally known as kamaboko, for hundreds of years, but the "krableg" was a post World War II invention. They take relatively cheap fish -- mostly pollock -- and grind it up into a greyish paste or gel, which is then bleached and combined with starch, eggwhites, flavoring and texturizing chemicals. Then the paste is formed by machine into sheets. The sheets are rolled up into strands, dyed and cut into Krab Legs. I've seen -- and smelled -- the process up close and personal and haven't eaten 'em since.

Digg!

Tagged as: environment, moon, fish

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Remember them
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 4, 2006 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when they used to sell flowers and have mass weddings? Now they are almost a world power owning newspapers and almost a monoply on sushi. They might be crazy, but crazy like a fox. Very interesting article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: emember them Posted by: Joshua Holland
Moratorium . . .
Posted by: JCR on Nov 4, 2006 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anything short of an all-out commercial fishing moratorium lasting between 2 and 3 years (on many species save sardines, etc.) will lead to the eventual collapse of our natural, saltwater fisheries. A ban on private fishing wouldn't be a bad idea either but is pretty much unenforceable. It would be difficult enough monitoring commerical vessels let alone every private craft dropping a line in the water.

Governments must eventually step in and take a more aggressive stance on this problem as the impetus to preserve fisheries will never come from within the industry itself. Too much $$ to be made in salmon and tuna. I wonder if the government isn't just frightened at the prospect of having thousands of fisherman strolling main street in search of alternate employment . . . just kidding of course but they are a rough bunch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But wait, there's more...
Posted by: HeroesAll on Nov 4, 2006 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only are the fish stocks being dangerously depleted, but there's more, and it's not a set of steak knives.

First up, overfishing of the predator species means that some populations down the line disappear because of disease: if you kill most of the predators, the weak and sick don't get eaten, so there's a much greater chance of catastrophic disease. Some populations have disappeared completely this way already.

Second, the oceans are becoming wonderful hosts for things much lower down the food chain. Algae, for instance. In particular, there's a variant of cyanobacteria called 'fireweed' that can grow fast enough that it could cover a football field in an hour. And, of course, it's not called fireweed because it gives you a buzz: check this link for some more info, and this link for an aerial picture (and because one of the scientists has the charming name of Boris Worm).

We did a story on this fireweed a couple of months ago, and some of the fishermen's stories are quite hair-raising. In the early days of the infestation at Moreton Bay, one poor bugger took a wee over the side without washing his hands. He must have thought it was God's punishment for something (before the news got out and he got to a hospital for treatment). Searing welts on the willie, Batman, that fireweed's nasty stuff.

Is there anything we can't fuck up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But wait, there's more... Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: But wait, there's more... Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: But wait, there's more... Posted by: HeroesAll
farmed fish
Posted by: mwildfire on Nov 5, 2006 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I think I'll try to stick to farmed fish whenever I can."
Sorry. That's no solution. There are too many ecological problems with modern fish farming--essentially the same ones with any other industrial farming monoculture operation. Any time you get an enormous concentration of one species in one place, you create a paradise for whatever organisms prey on that species. So inevitably you get disease problems. Which you reduce by using antibiotics constantly. Which means there's antibiotic residue in the food, which exacerbates problems with antibiotic resistance in humans. Also means antibiotics are loaded into the water supply.
With farmed fish, you have a couple of other things: most of these farms are on the coasts, so the diseases they incubate wash into the seas and cause heavy problems with, for example, unnaturally high levels of lice infestation in wild salmon. With shrimp, you've got the decimation of mangroves to create the farms--3/4 of Ecuador's mangrove coasts have been obliterated to make shrimp farms.
Another thing with salmon: farmed salmon don't turn pink like wild ones do, and consumers expect salmon flesh to be pink. So they put a chemical in the feed to turn them pink--and this chemical is suspect in terms of human health.
The oceans can't sustain a human population of six billion. Seems to me the only solution is to outlaw fishing with industrial-scale technology, leave it to guys in little boats with nets and poles. And for overfed Americans to leave the remaining fish for those who won't get any other food but a little rice. And perhaps fish farming can be done on land in ways which avoid the problems I've mentioned, by making the ponds one part of a diverse system--but that certainly isn't the norm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: farmed fish Posted by: HeroesAll
serial rapers of the world's oceans AND forests
Posted by: beez on Nov 6, 2006 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dear Mr Holland , you state that "While the Japanese have long been leaders in forestry management, they are, as any minke whale or finless shark can tell you, the sweaty, 240-pound serial rapists of the oceans." i do wonder on what evidence this claim is made? it is surely not based on what any tropical tree has told you. according to forestry records, Japanese forests inside Japan are quite well conserved, however the forests of nearly all neighbouring have been ravaged by Japanese and/or Japanese-funded logging companies in order to supply the enormous (but unnecessarily so) Japanese home market for tropical wood, primarily in the construction industries. these deplorable facts are well known in forestry circles. and it is clear that the depletion and destruction of south east asian forests, is causing both the Japanese and Chinese to put pressure on the forests of africa. this is not/not a reflection of good forest management, in which the Japanese have never been known to be 'leaders'; unfortunately they are known as 'serial rapers' of the world's forests - sadly, the same title that you give in regard to the worlds oceans. please find another field of natural resource management for which "the Japanese have long been leaders "... sorry i can't help you on that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where we're heading if we don't. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 6, 2006 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Halt the Moony Machine and the degradation of Earth's oceans; STOP EATING BAIT!!

. . . And 'say hello' to Soylent Green . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

¨It is shockingly easy for politicians, economists, and
Posted by: mdruss42 on Nov 6, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
planners to forget that the economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment¨
Quote from ¨The Human Race is Living Beyond It´s Means¨, Simms, The Independent of London, Oct. 9, 2006.

Do any of you remember the second set of films, after 20 or 30 years, of the seabed off Haiti done by Jacques Cousteau?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]