Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

What Republicans call 'spin' the rest of the world calls 'lies'

Posted by Bob Geiger at 8:48 AM on November 2, 2006.


As even a child knows, if you know as a matter of fact that what you're saying is untrue -- it's a lie.

My young son and I were talking last week about the definition of a lie. As a nine-year-old, he's expanding his boundaries and testing the waters on how little he can get away with telling my wife and me without crossing the line into being a liar. This seems to me like a perfectly normal part of childhood development so, as we talked, I used an example from last winter, when we had a misunderstanding about whether or not his school had been closed in advance of a monster snowstorm.

He told me the night before that he heard from one of the teachers that, because of the magnitude of the expected storm, classes had been called off in advance for the next day. We found out later that night that this information was incorrect, that a preemptive snow-day had not been called and my little boy promptly apologized for "lying."

I asked at the time if he knew that a snow-day had really not been called and, when he replied that he really did believe his information was correct, I explained that he had simply been mistaken and that he had not lied. If he had found out at 6:00 PM that his information was wrong, I said to him, telling me at 7:00 PM that school had already been canceled would indeed have been a lie.

My little boy understands and acknowledges that obvious distinction -- Republicans do not.

As if we need more evidence of this, Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman sent out an e-mail blast yesterday lashing John Kerry for allegedly insulting America's military personnel.

"Listen closely this election season and you'll hear the truth about what Democrats represent," wrote Mehlman. "Monday, failed Presidential candidate John Kerry brazenly insulted the brave American men and women serving in our military. In Kerry's cocoon of privilege, those who serve in our military are failures who never did their homework or 'made an effort to be smart.'"

"Our troops deserve to be honored, not insulted by the likes of John Kerry."

Mehlman ended his deceptive pitch by getting down to brass tacks and saying "We need you now to keep the John Kerry Democrats out of power."

By any sensible person's definition -- and what an average grade-school child would understand -- is that this was a lie. Ken Mehlman knew when he released this e-mail that John Kerry had not "brazenly insulted the brave American men and women serving in our military." He knew from a comparison of the prepared text and how Kerry bungled the joke he intended to tell that it was meant for Mehlman's master, George W. Bush, and not the troops in Iraq and that there was certainly nothing brazen about it.

He knew all of that as a matter of fact, in addition to knowing that, unlike the vast majority of the Republican leadership, John Kerry is a highly-decorated Veteran, who has always fought for America's Vets and active-duty military and would never lob such disrespect their way.

But Mehlman said it anyway. He knew at 1:00 PM that what he was writing was a lie. But he sent the e-mail at 2:00 PM anyway.

George W. Bush did the same thing in a speech after Kerry made his remarks but well after the truth of the Massachusetts Senator's intent was known -- he bashed Kerry, knowing it would be all over the world on nightly newscasts and also knowing that it was a total lie.

But, of course, it's not just confined to John Kerry or this one, isolated non-story.

Enter White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, who just yesterday, went to the Brady Briefing Room and told the nation's Press Corps a lie that all national Republicans continue to offer, despite substantial evidence to the contrary.

"You have heard me talk in recent days about how important it is to get people to focus on substantive issues," said Snow to the White House press. "And again, it's striking that in the war on terror -- winning the war on terror, Democrats have decided they're not going to tell you what their plan is. It's the most important issue; why not tell you what the plan is?"

White House reporters, perhaps tiring of being played for chumps and fed the Democrats-don't-have-a-plan line over and over again, immediately called Snow on it.

"You say that you want to see Democrats offer -- engage in a more substantive way on Iraq," pressed one reporter. "And yet when Democrats do that, their ideas are either rejected out of hand, as was the case with Biden's idea of partitioning Iraq, or in the case of Murtha, he had Republican members of Congress effectively accuse him of being a coward and say that the idea doesn't reflect reality. So when you have substantive proposals, redeploying troops is a substantive proposal, partitioning the country is substantive."

In addition to Democrat Jack Murtha learning that bringing an Iraq plan to the Republicans gets you called a coward -- even if you are a decorated combat Veteran who spent 37 years in the U.S. Marines -- the biggest element of Snow's lie is how he willfully ignores that Democrats put forth a major, comprehensive security initiative in the Senate less than two months ago and had it shot down by the GOP leadership.

On September 13, 2006, the Real Security Act of 2006, sponsored by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), was killed by an almost straight party-line vote in the Senate. The legislation, all 528 pages of it, offered, as its amendment purpose stated, "to provide real national security, restore United States leadership, and implement tough and smart policies to win the war on terror."

That's 528 pages of detailed description of the Democratic plan to secure our domestic infrastructure, end the war in Iraq and bring our military men and women home to their families.

But, just yesterday, in saying that Democrats have never told anyone what their plan is, Tony Snow lied yet again. This is not subject to partisan interpretation -- it is a lie. See for yourself: You can go here to see the legislation, S.AMDT. 4936.

And perhaps the most despicable of the lies surrounding the GOP's manufactured news story about John Kerry, is the fact that Republican John McCain, a fellow decorated Veteran and someone Kerry once called a friend, kept the lie going for his party in spite of what he knew was the truth. Even after the context of Kerry's remarks became clear to anyone interested in reality, McCain went on the attack, demanding that Kerry apologize for sentiments that McCain knew full well were a twisted invention of his own party.

Mighty disgusting stuff to be sure.

Politics can often be much more gray than black and white. Certainly, I've learned in covering the United States Senate that things are sometimes not what they seem and that the process of governing can at times be complex and filled with nuance.

But there are some things that are absolute. And one of those is that the Republican party of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Ken Mehlman, Tony Snow and John McCain is filled throughout with a craven pack of liars whose only interest is to remain in power, while railroading those who oppose them and scaring the hell out of each and every American along the way to achieve their goals.

And that's something even a child can understand.

Digg!

Tagged as: lies, election06

Bob Geiger is a writer, activist and Democratic District Leader in Westchester County, NY.


Poll-watch: Gallup Finds Wedding-Cake Sized Marriage Gap in Pres Race
Apparently, the married and unmarried have very different concerns.
Post by AlterNet Staff. August 21, 2008.
Michael Moore Dares to Ask: What's So Heroic About Being Shot Down While Bombing Innocent Civilians?
Like Iraq, Vietnam was not a noble cause. It's time we stopped letting politicians and the press perpetuate the McCain War Hero myth.
Post by Liliana Segura. August 21, 2008.
Bush Capitulates, Troop Withdrawal in 2011?
The left won the Iraq debate. Period.
Post by Spencer Ackerman. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As Hitler and Goebbels said..sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Nov 2, 2006 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repeat a lie often enough and people will believe it. It worked for the 3rd Reich, we will soon know if it works for the 4th Reich

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The official 9/11 myth is a LIE.....take a look.....
Posted by: LeftWright on Nov 2, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a few highlights:

1) VP Cheney put in charge of NORAD just before 9/11.

2) The fifteen wargames/government exercises that were going on the day of the 9/11 attacks. Some of these were live-fly exercises that involved mock hijackings and false radar injects in the northeast air corridor. The total non-response of the Air Force for nearly two hours.

3) President Bush's behavior and statements on the morning of 9/11 and his recollection of that morning.

4) The clear evidence of insider foreknowledge demonstrated by the highly unusual stock trades in the period just before 9/11.

5) The collapse, still unexplained, of WTC 7.

6) The total destruction of the Twin Towers, which even the NIST report does not adequately or scientifically explain. (Where did all the molten steel come from?)

7) No evidence that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.

8) Flight 93 debris spread over eight square miles, no plane or bodies at "crash" site.

9) Pakistan's ISI chief, Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, ordering Saeed Sheikh to send $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just before 9/11. That same ISI chief meeting with U.S. government officials during the week of 9/11.

I could go on for hours. Instead, read any or all of the following:

The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin

The Hidden History of 9-11-2001 Paul Zarembka, editor

The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson

Towers of Deception by Barrie Zwicker

The War On Truth by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

The Politics of Heroin by Alfred W. McCoy

Crossing the Rubicon by Michael C. Ruppert

9/11: Synthetic Terror Made in USA by Webster G. Tarpley

Check out these sites:

From The Wilderness

Scholars For 9/11 Truth

911Truth.org

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jimbo
Posted by: Jjimbo53 on Nov 2, 2006 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All these liars can rot in hell after next Tuesday Nov. 7.. Get out and VOTE>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a foreigner sees it
Posted by: medbear on Nov 2, 2006 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We call them "crap-packages" here, when one party leaks/claims knowledge of/distributes disadvantageous - often sleazy and embarrasing - information about opponents. I guess this is universal, though one could get the impression that this years US campaigns have established a new high - or low - to disgrace. Common as it may be, it is still low and has nothing to do with decency.

But, and this is not said with malice, this is not unilateral degradation. For the "crap-packages" to work, to have influence, they must have an audience. With the supporters would be nice, but the most crucial audience is the opposition. And it seems like they play along, one moment responding to allegations with righteous anger, the next committing the same disgraceful acts by delivering their own crap.

Ah, yes, the politicians, you might think. I say not so. It is us, the commoners, who are to blame. We are the nitwits that happily distribute, blog, mail, tell, fax and so on these stories. It is we who makes politics so disgraced that the lame joke of a single man are used by his opponents to muster votes. Or the other way around, that a vice precidents wife's long gone authorship is fronted in triumph as "pornography".

The accusations and reports are interdependent. If one stops, the other stands alone, stripped of any credibility, naked for everyone to see. We are the people the politicians wants to call to their side. We acklaim their indecency by gathering in our "congregations" (like Alternet, or WND or the likes) to preach to our choir, working up a frenzy of anger that puts us on the same level as the ones we criticize.

Which one of the politicians has the decency to ignore nonsense filth and petty rumours, and concentrate on things that matter? Which one of us is willing to do the same?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As a foreigner sees it Posted by: Techubus
Kerry Tells the Truth=Selective Service and H.R. 4752
Posted by: mite on Nov 2, 2006 1:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about this people; Kerry told the truth " work hard in school, and do your homework or go to Iraq." I think Kerry's master's (Federal Reserve, Bank Cartel) told him `OOPs' don't be telling the truth.
Buried deep in the 670 pages of the No Child Left Behind Act is a provision which requires that public schools give military recruiters access to facilities and also contact information for every student. Student loans, and grants are being cut that those middle class and poor students can be conditioned for the military.
The Selective Service System has received an extra $28 million in funds for 2004 budget to fill all 10,350 draft board positions. www.utne.com May 6, 2004 by Adam Stuz/Bob Keeler/Connor Freff Cochran
109th Congress 2nd Session H.R. 4752 is in the Committee on Armed Services introduced by Mr. Rangel. It presents a new draft by our Congress to require all persons 18-42 years old (women included) to be drafted.
So you see Kerry let the bag out by mistake and the republicans used it to side track the truth again; like the so called conflict on terror and Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of Cource Foreign Terror is a Whitehouse Fabrication
Posted by: edgar_michel on Nov 3, 2006 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should all not forget that foreign terror has been and is a fabrication of the Whitehouse designed to marshall millitary reasources to defend U.S. corporations' mineral rights leases in foreign countries as well as opening up Iraq for U.S. oil fields development. Therefore terrorism is a lie in the first place. So what does it matter if a liar uses another lie to elaborate on the greater lie. It's all a lie and our brothers in uniform over seas are being used as cannon fodder to protect a lie and they will never get a chance to use their V.A. bennefits to graduate from college.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]