Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Do us a favor. Keep Air America on the air!

Posted by The Masher at 5:37 PM on October 31, 2006.


The Masher: Help the progressive talk radio station survive its troubled times.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

One of the reasons it would be a mistake to let Air America Radio (AAR) fade away, or get into the hands of corporate suits with no politics, or suitors more interested in themselves than a powerful progressive voice, are the numbers.

Numbers of course speak louder than words, but these numbers speak volumes:

Rush Limbaugh: 13.5 million listeners
Sean Hannity: 12.5 million listeners
Michael Savage: 8.25 million listeners
Dr. [sic] Laura Schlessinger: 8 million listeners
Laura Ingrham: 5 million listeners

Do the math: 47.5 million estimated minimal audience weekly for conservatives. And the billions of progressive dollars out there, and we can't even keep one progressive talk station going? So what if it cost $10 million a year to keep it thriving-- that's the monthly interest for some of the wealth on our side. It would be worth it. The ripple effect is huge, and Air America never got its web presence down-- a sure source of growth in the future. But Air America was never meant to be a vanity project; it is a viable business, that aims to harness the progressive marketplace, something that has yet to be effectively tried. And it takes some time.

One of the problems is that many of our investors and intellectuals, even this writer, don't have much use for talk radio. Too shrill, to repetitive. But it is not about us. It is about a progressive media ecology. For progressives to successfully fight conservative and corporate media requires us to have effective assets in different media ourselves. We must have a shrill voice to compete with the jackasses on the other side... who are, by the way, gloating at the mess that is Air America Radio. And anyway, ours doesn't have to be quite as shrill as theirs.

As Doug Kreeger, one of AAR's original investors and former CEO says:

"We cannot change the climate in this country if we do not have a strong alternative to the vast power the conservatives enjoy in the mass media. While many in the radio business view AAR as merely a format, it is a necessary information network that acts to counterbalance the disequilibrium created over the last twenty years through deregulation of the media and the ascension by the conservative to the point where they dominate the airwaves in every conceivable fashion."

We need progressive talk and no one understands that better than Tom Hartman, one of the more effective and clever progressive radio voices, with a show currently on Air America.

He offers a lesson in losing money and gaining influence:

"There are times when doing the profitable thing is also doing the right thing. That's certainly what Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch thought when they lost an average of $90 million a year for about five years before the Fox News Channel became profitable. It's what Reverend Moon believes, as his Washington Times newspaper lost hundreds of millions of dollars and, according to some reports, even today continues to lose money."

Rupert Murdoch's investment in Fox News not only produced profits for him, it changed America. As Richard Morin noted in The Washington Post on May 4, 2006, in an article titled "The Fox News Effect": "Fox News convinced 3 to 8 percent of its audience to shift its voting behavior towards the Republican Party, a sizable media persuasion effect."

Similarly, Air America Radio may have had a significant effect in awakening people across the United States to positive liberal alternatives to the conservative vision of Fox and Bush. In a democracy, which depends on a vital and ongoing exchange of free ideas for its survival, this is essential.

It's a tragedy that for the lack of investors the size of Rupert Murdoch, Air America is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. But its existence and ongoing presence in the marketplace is an essential part of the dialogue that is known as democracy.

Digg!

Tagged as: radio, air america, progressive

The Masher reveals inner secrets and social linkages, while exposing the media misbehaviors of the corporate bad guys.


Those Trying to Blame Immigrants for Wall Street's Failures are Wrong
Motives behind "Blame the Immigrants" game exposed, anti-Latino sentiment underscores extremists' approach.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.
Bill Maher Kicks Zucker's Conservative Ass at the Box Office
The per-screen average of Religulous was three times that of the conservative film An American Carol.
Post by Jane Hamsher. October 6, 2008.
A Desperate McCain Attacks Obama With Vicious Smears
With his campaign flailing, McCain shamelessly tries to manipulate voters by appealing to their 'lizard brains.'
Post by Arianna Huffington. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Air America, Thumbs Down
Posted by: vkobaya on Oct 31, 2006 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really don't care for Air America. The station is trying to immitate the success of the right wing radio stations with loud-mouthed, offensive, stupid jerks. There are thoughtful, intelligent, respectable talk show hosts of the left persuasion, such as Michael Jackson, once respected as the dean of all talk show hosts. The right has bought and destroyed two stations to keep Jackson off the air. He is available now. Jackson is probably worth a jump of an order of magnitude in the size of Air America's listening audience, probably by himself could pull them out of bankruptcy, yet he remains out of a job. There are others, such as Bernie Ward, a bit loudmouthed for my tastes, but still intelligent and actually has something to say. Listening to the current lineup of Air America is about as bad as listening to Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilley, intollerable for more than a minute if not 30 or 40 seconds. They are noisy, empty gongs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First Things First
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 31, 2006 11:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I started out my college career in the College of Communications and have some knowledge of radio and broadcasting. The cardinal rule of all broadcasting is that, whatever the program, it has to be good radio. That takes good broadcasters.

Rush Limbaugh & Sean Hannity may be political shills that you do not agree with but they have the radio thing down. They paid their dues in local radio long before they ever got a chance to talk to a national audience. Randi Rhodes & Laura Flanders have it on AAR, but many on their 'air' do not. Pap & RFK, Jr are also amazing with Ring of Fire.

Radio has to be tight, timely, always on the mark and very professional. Anything else and you have lost the war before the first shot is fired. It can't sound like community access TV looks.

Next, who is doing the ad sales over there? The audience is big enough to attract somebody-- even if they have to sell their time at a discount. Nothing kills the flow of a broadcast like 2 minutes of bumper music that screams 'we don't have any advertisers'. Note that in the phrase commercial radio that the word commercial comes first. It's time a few liberals with means step up and advertise their business on AAR or the local affiliates.

I'm not here to bash people and the staff at AAR is obviously making lemonade out of lemons, but if progressive people in the entertainment industry, journalism, etc want a national voice they need to step up and pitch in. Maybe some have offered their help and been rebuffed, being an outsider it's impossible to know.

This network, warts and all, is the only national progressive voice out there. If it goes silent, we will all be the poorer for it. Radio is a tough business and network radio in this day and age is really tough. AAR had to go on without the benefit of a huge farm system of local progressive hosts that feed the NeoCon Echo Chamber of the Air™©. Progressives need to embrace it and help it grow.

If you are tired of the conspiracy nut-balls and flakes try calling in yourself. Calling in is not that different than blogging and it is interactive in real time. Embrace AAR or watch it die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: First Things First Posted by: hbw
One More Thing...
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 31, 2006 11:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anybody at AAR even considered the possibility of giving Phil Donohue? The dude's a Hall of Fame broadcaster, has a Rolodex many would kill for, has cred with the progressives, etc. Let the guy pick his time slot. He could well be to Air America Radio what Larry King once was to Mutual before his CNN gig.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This approach doesn't work
Posted by: jstillwater on Nov 1, 2006 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the problems is that many of our investors and intellectuals, even this writer, don't have much use for talk radio. Too shrill, to repetitive. But it is not about us. It is about a progressive media ecology.

You are telling people to support something whether they like it or not, for the good of an ideology -- "a progressive media ecology," whatever that means to you. I wish Air America the best of luck, but I don't think you will get many takers. People who consider themselves liberal don't generally line up behind things they don't agree with just because someone tells them to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Corporate Radio?
Posted by: lessbread on Nov 1, 2006 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that progressive and corporate present a grand contradiction, so I've always preferred listening to Pacifica radio. Instead of trying to build a radio network from scratch, I think extending the Pacifica network would have been more fruitful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Air America Boycotted by advertisers.
Posted by: spacestevie on Nov 1, 2006 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder they can't make any money. Media Matters recently revealed that over 100 corporate sponsors asked that their spots NOT AIR DURING AIR AMERICA PROGRAMING! ABC radio internal docs have a list of advertisers that range from Coke and Mc Donalds, to the US Navy. Microsoft, J.C. Penny, Federal Express, the US Postal Service, Wal-Mart (of course), and I could go on and on. You may see the complete list at this URL:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310008

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AAR could be so much better
Posted by: Techubus on Nov 1, 2006 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly I think they really dropped the ball when they set up this station.

When I first started listening (after getting XM) I was suprised at some of the hosts. First they had Jerry Springer, I could not for the life of me understand what he was doing on this station. He's terrible at radio, period. To have the former host of the biggest piece of TV trash in history represent progressives is insulting.

Al Franken, he's alright on TV as a comedian, but as a political radio host he simply doesn't cut it. There were others whose names escape me that just came off as completely lackluster.

There were only 2 hosts that really did a good job in my opinion, and they let go the better of the 2 of them. Rhandi Rhodes is good at what she does, and she obviously has a lot of experience. Sometimes she gets on my nerves but ultimately she is a good asset to the station. Then there was Mike Malloy. The moment he went off the air was the moment my enthusiasm for the station died.

This recent reformatting was a good effort, getting rid of the worst hosts like Springer, but with the exception of the Young Turks (who come on to early for me to catch on the west coast) the new broadcasts just don't hold my attention at all. Rhandi is the only host I occasionaly listen to now, and the ring of fire.

Other annoyances abound. Where did they get that guy that does the promotional voice overs for the shows? He's terrible! I cringe everytime I hear him crack some lame 1 liner.

The commercial troubles are predicable and I doubt those can ever be resolved. Big corporations and leftists do not mix, we have incompatible goals. The companies know this and they avoid advertising, as demonstrated by the post above mine. That leaves us with fringe companies. I don't know about the rest of you, but I've never heard 1 commercial on that station that interested me in what they were selling.

I don't know, on one hand we need an alternative voice on the air. Unfortunately I don't believe that such a voice is commercialy viable. Maybe it could be, but in order for that to happen AAR needs to be completely reborn with a line up of good hosts. Rhandi can't carry the station alone. And please, please find a new announcer and bring back Mike!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too Many Lightweights
Posted by: the islander on Nov 1, 2006 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's heartbreaking to watch AAR disappearing from the air. There are wonderful, knowledgeable, spirited, fearless and above all honest hosts but most of them have been taken off the air. All we have left in my area in northern Vermont during the weekday is Randi Rhodes. I still listen to her every day.
There used to be Sam Seder, Tom Hartman, Laura Flanders, Mike Malloy -- Why would I turn on a progressive talk radio station to listen to a couple of hosts laughing at their own jokes! What does that tell the Repugs about our sincerity. We've got to do more than laugh at what the Repugs have done to our country.
I used to be able to listen from morning right into the night. Now the station goes on the air when the sun gets up and goes down with the sun. It's heartbreaking. these are serious times. Get more hosts with substance on the air. We're not just dumb out here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Co-Opted By Clear Channel?
Posted by: lessbread on Nov 2, 2006 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The AAR station here in Fresno is relayed out of building that pumps out a dozen other channels and is primarily known as the home of the channel that spews Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. I don't know that all of those stations are owned by the same company or that the company is Clear Channel (The KGOP station claims to be owned by CBS Radio) but Clear Channel is an obvious suspect. Anyway, Is that also the case in other cities?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]