Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

UPDATED w/ House ratings: Halliburton Voter Guide

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 6:33 AM on October 30, 2006.


Contractors tell you who THEY love...

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Via anonymous tipster, comes a voter guide from the Contract Services Association (CSA) that you won't want to miss!

The CSA, whose president Christopher Jahn, was the Chief of Staff for Wyoming Republican Craig Thomas, is an influential organization of Military (and other) government contractors, with $40 billion in contracts. Some of the 200 or so members you'll recognize as major providers of Iraq War personnel and services:

  • DynCorp
  • Kellogg Brown and Root (a Halliburton subsidiary)
  • L-3 Communications
  • Lockheed Martin
  • Northrop Grumman
  • Pacific Architects and Engineers, Inc.
  • SAIC
  • The Shaw Group, Inc.
  • Wackenhut Corporation

The CSA also has an illustrious history of lobbying against regulations on human trafficking: "A proposal prohibiting defense contractor involvement in human trafficking for forced prostitution and labor was drafted by the Pentagon last summer, but five defense lobbying groups oppose key provisions..."

Let's see if you can spot the pattern in the members of the Senate loved by your friendly neighborhood military contractor... And special gift for the reader who creates a spreadsheet from the House PDF that matches my Senate spreadsheet below...

UPDATE: Thanks to all the readers who assembled House guides... the first came from Pat Fletcher of Tacoma, WA. Thanks Pat! And please, pass this along so all your Halliburton stockholder pals will know whom to vote back into office... Pink is Republican (A means contractors love you!) and blue is Democrat... Click each file below to see slightly larger version...

Digg!

Tagged as: election06

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CSA == Confederate States of America
Posted by: lessbread on Oct 27, 2006 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...an illustrious history of lobbying against regulations on human trafficking... 'Nuff said

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'Trafficked' slaves building Baghdad US Embassy?
Posted by: Wyrdgal on Oct 27, 2006 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slave Labor building US Embassy in Baghdad?

Although the CSA isn't mentioned directly in the article referenced below, the reality of human trafficking and 'debt slavery' in building the US Embassy in Baghdad is spelled out. Contractors have been receiving US taxpayer dollars totrick people from India, Phillipines, and other countries into 'debt slavery' in Iraq. Please click through to the Asia Times article and read for yourself!

Worker ‘recruitment’ techniques, and work conditions, in the US-funded Baghdad embassy, mirror techniques of ‘debt slavery’, as described in Andrew Cockburn’s article “21st-Century Slaves” (National Geographic, Sept 2003).

Article on 'debt slaves' , Asia Times, Oct 27 2006 --
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HJ27Ak01.html -- David Phinney is a journalist and broadcaster based in Washington, DC. He can be contacted at phinneydavid@yahoo.com.

Are US taxpayers paying for slave labor to build an embassy in Baghdad? Two Americans, previously employed by “First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting, the lead builder for the new US$592 million US Embassy in Baghdad” describe practices that amount to ‘debt slavery’. David Phinney’s article describes workers from the Phillipines and India, who had been told they were going to work in Dubai, being taken instead to Baghdad, even though both countries had “banned or restricted their citizens from working in Iraq because of safety concerns and growing opposition to the war.”
“The Kuwait-headquartered, Lebanese-run company has billed several billion dollars on US contracts since the war began in March 2003. Much of its work is performed by cheap labor largely hired from South Asia, and the company has an estimated 7,500 foreign laborers in the theater of war.

”Now, with a highly secretive contract awarded by the US State Department, First Kuwaiti is in the midst of building the most expensive and heavily fortified embassy in the world. Scheduled to open next year, the sprawling complex near the Tigris River will equal Vatican City in size. “
[...]
“Some contractors, many working as subcontractors to Halliburton in Iraq, were found to be using deceptive, bait-and-switch hiring practices and charging recruiting fees that indebted low-paid migrant workers for many months or even years to their employers. Contractors were also accused of providing substandard, crowded sleeping quarters, serving poor food and circumventing Iraqi immigration procedures. “

Phinney's article gives further descriptions of workers’ treatment. US State Dept & DOD have investigated, a few procedural ‘corrections’ have been made (at least on paper).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]