Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Moyers Preview: Net Neutrality

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 4:55 PM on October 17, 2006.


Who will own the tubes?
Moyers/NN

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The clip to the right is a preview from the first installment of Bill Moyers' new multipart series on the internets...

And here's some background:

From an April post, as clear an explanation as you'll find:

Parachutec explains: "The Internet began with regulations that blocked providers from favoring access to one site over another. That’s Internet Freedom, a.k.a., 'Net Neutrality.' That means you can access what you want when you want, and anyone can create a web based destination. Phone companies were set up along similar lines: they are not allowed to block you from calling any number you choose."

Who's the Boss? star Alyssa Milano of all people gets it when she outlines just a few of the scenarios we face if the "first amendment of the internet" is gutted:

Imagine, wanting to donate money to a charity and not being able to open the non-profit’s web page because of the charity’s inability to afford the dominant Internet provider’s fees required to make the page efficient? Imagine the millions of life saving dollars these charities will lose if lobbyists get their way? What if your child is sick and you can’t gain access to a support group’s page because the support group can’t afford the fees? Or even scarier, imagine not gaining speedy access to a politician’s views because the specific provider is against his or her ideology?

Digg!

Tagged as: internet, net, neutrality

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It will happen: just like it has on tv and radio
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 17, 2006 9:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The powers that be always wish to control the population. This is why the Democrats push for 'fair' talk-radio guidelines, both Repubs and Democrats made McCain-Feingold to limit political speech. This is why the Repubs have new terror laws to prohibit donations and speech for certain groups or views. This is why certain t-shirts are banned in schools. They will try to control the internet also.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]