Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Admin Pisses off Evangelicals, OKs Gay Marriage [VIDEO]

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 4:14 AM on October 18, 2006.


The Cultural Conservative Exodus has begun...
sullivan/gays

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

A week ago today, and just six days before the religious right's anti-gay hullabaloo, Liberty Sunday, Condi Rice swore in a new U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Dr. Mark R. Dybul.

The ceremony also featured a very curious group of people for a high-level Republican affair; from the State Department's website:

"I would like to extend a special welcome to the First Lady. Mrs. Bush... a number of Ambassador Dybul's family members joining us on this auspicious occasion. They include: partner, Jason Claire; mother, Claire Dybul; father, Richard Dybul; and mother-in-law, Marilyn Claire. Please join me in extending a very warm welcome to all of our distinguished guests."

Dr. Dybul is gay, and is, ostensibly, "married" to Jason Claire.

As Andrew Sullivan points out in the clip to the upper right, most Republican elites don't have a problem with gay marriage. Their only problem with it is that they'd lose their power were they to acknowledge their genuine values. In the clip, Sullivan, a former Bush supporter, and self-proclaimed conservative says:

We know that Condi Rice and Laura Bush have no problem with gay marriage. In fact, most of the elite republicans on the Hill have no problem with gay marriage. But they use homophobia to win votes at the base. And that is the underlying, tectonic problem going on here: Hypocrisy.

Even Condi's and Laura's acknowledgment of the legitimacy of this one couple, may, in fact, be another trickle in the Republican Party's imminent hemorrhage. They'll need to stick a "finger in the dike," but quickly, if they're to stop it.

Ironically, I only learned of the event via the eagle-eye of one Tony Perkins -- head of the very Family Research Council which hosted and organized Liberty Sunday. Perkins writes:

Dr. Dybul placed his hand on a Bible held by his homosexual partner Jason Claire. First the State Department's Deputy Chief of Protocol, Raymond Martinez, and then Secretary Rice herself referred to Mr. Claire's mother as Dr. Dybul's "mother in law." Both Martinez and Rice referred to Dr. Dybul's "family"...

Then there's the book by David Kuo, laying waste to the Bush administration's Faith-Based Initiatives program and his commitment to ending poverty.

It was only a matter of time, then, before bits of the religious right began to set sail for more compatible shores. An Op-Ed in Tennessee's Chattanoogan could be the death knell for the 30-year-old marriage of the Republicans and the religious right: "...it is time to build an ark. It is time to leave the Republican Party."

Defending his call for a new party, Greg Cain writes:

I know that seems like a radical move. But it has become increasingly apparent that the core values of the Republican Party are not Tennessean or Christian values. The Mark Foley Branch of the Log Cabin Republicans has seen to that.

The Republican Party has had success convincing Christians that their party actually is more moral and more sincerely religious than the Democrats. However, the events of the last year have begun to unravel that carefully constructed image. It is time all Christians to ask ourselves if it is possible for God to bless a polluted party.

Read more on the split in Alan Wolfe's front page article, "Are Evangelicals Over?"

And here's that photo once again... it's worth it's own spot...

Digg!

Tagged as: religious, right, marriage, marriage, same-sex, gay

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hypocrites
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 17, 2006 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally the truth comes out!! Almost everyone on the left has known all along that the "evangelicals" were being played. The evangelicals think they can take over capitol hill but they dont have the power they only think they do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrites Posted by: willymack
Thomas Jefferson -- 1798
Posted by: bobandharry on Oct 17, 2006 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A little patience, and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their spells dissolve, and the people, recovering their true sight, restore their government to its true principles. It is true that in the mean time we are suffering deeply in spirit, and incurring the horrors of a war & long oppressions of enormous public debt. ..." -- Thomas Jefferson to John Taylor, 4 June 1798

Today's witches would be the hypocrits that tout their Christianity but spread their spells (lies) and act like any other low life terrorist who thinks that the Creator speaks just to them and them only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thomas Jefferson -- 1798 Posted by: Lizzzarde
» RE: Thomas Jefferson -- 1798 Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
Ding Dong!
Posted by: grumble-bum on Oct 17, 2006 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we all scamper about in glee, singing "Ding-dong, the Wicked Witch is dead", no one seems to be discussing what, to me, is a key question.

While I am as overjoyed as the next Progressive that the Republican strangle-hold on "morality issues" is finally weakening & that Conservative Christians are no longer automatically going to give those currently in power their unquestioning support, I must wonder WHO THEY WILL SUPPORT. It's not as though the crumbling structure of the GOP is going to cause the Religious Right to magically disappear. Tele-Evangelic-Power-Hour-Players are not suddenly going to cancel their lucrative "ministries". We will not see millions of true believers experiencing overnight conversions to a genial "live-&-let-live" mindset.

However you feel about these people's convictions, it cannot be forgotten that they are CONVINCED. There may be a period of disillusionment & disorganization, but they WILL regroup & continue to advance their cause, either through a purged & revamped GOP or through a new "populist" party. A driving force behind the Fundamentalist interpretation of Christ's teachings seems to be feelings of fear & marginalization. How on earth will this improve with the revelations of hypocrisies among those self-appointed to lead the charge?

A movement that tacitly supports the murder of people it finds offensive (doctors, judges, etc.) is most certainly not going to evaporate simply due to some cracks in the facade. Desperate people will engage in desperate acts. I fear that this "setback" we are all so busy snickering about will turn out to be the most galvanizing event in the recent history of the Religious Right. These folks are committed & they are feeling cornered & betrayed. We dismiss them at great cost, both as neighbors within our communities & in terms of the future unity of our nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ding Dong! Posted by: BillC
» RE: Ding Dong! Posted by: kittynboi
GOP lies to the Evangelicas -
Posted by: Quechick Barnyard on Oct 17, 2006 11:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP has been in the majority since 1994, and yet they have done nothing they promise to do for the Far Right Christian Evlangelicas. Why not? Because they can always get a vote from those who do believe their lies.. that is just a ploy to get the vote from the Chrisitan community. Nothing else serious. Just the vote please.

Q~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ding Dong indeed
Posted by: zipper696 on Oct 18, 2006 3:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grumble bum has pegged the REAL point we should attend to. Any and all of the disillusioned Fundies are still committed to their agenda of a Christian dominated administration in Washington.
It's unlikely they would go 180 degrees and discover the Democrats, it's equally unrealistic to expect them to fund a Third Party.
What seems the logical endgame here is that they will purged the GOP of all Bush cronies, push "genuine" Fundy candidates in their place and attempt a Taliban style takeover from within the House and Senate - if Bushco have been able to ride roughshod over the Constitution and Bill of Rights (not to mention International Law and The Geneva Convention) the Fundies as "The worm in the Apple" would be able to take the US firmly back to the Good Olde 19th Century.

Let's watch where their support starts to gather.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ding Dong indeed Posted by: kittynboi
Condi's Gaffe?
Posted by: domenico234 on Oct 18, 2006 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey! It's the first time "Condi" has done anything of which I have approved!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Condi's Gaffe? Posted by: helenwheels
Do evangelicals really read the Bible?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 18, 2006 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone needs to sit down these evangelicals and remind them that true morality does not involve whether or not gays can marry and/or live together, but rather how we each treat our fellow human beings and other living things of the Earth. A good place to start would be to point out what should be obvious to "true Christians": that there are at best only a few passages in the Bible concerning gays, but more than one thousand passages concerning how we should be kind and respectful toward the least fortunate among us.

This message should be clear to all evangelicals who really follow the Bible. I'm not sure if the reason they choose to ignore the obvious is a sin, but it sure smacks of convenient neglect. Maybe if they replace narrow and bigoted politics with true humanity, they will see that they have been backing the wrong party – and have been used by it as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other Hipocrisies in the "Faith Based Initiative" Exposed
Posted by: Trainer12 on Oct 18, 2006 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Condi Rice and Laura Bush aren't they only hipocrites in the Republican Administration. See the following below from the Center for American Progress, on "60 Minutes Last Weekend and on Olbermann's "Countdown" on MSNBC last week.

Losing the Faith
"More than five years after President Bush created the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives," David Kuo, the former special assistant to President Bush on faith-based issues, is "going public with an insider's tell-all account that portrays an office used almost exclusively to win political points." Kuo is a "self-described conservative Christian" who has worked with former Sen. Jack Kemp (R-NY), prominent conservative activist Bill Bennett, and former Attorney General John Ashcroft. In his book "Tempting Faith," Kuo accuses Karl Rove and others in the Bush administration of "cynically hijacking the faith-based initiatives idea for electoral gain," ignoring issues such as poverty, and limiting faith-based grants to organizations that are "politically friendly to the administration." Rove's office, according to Kuo, referred to evangelicals as "boorish," "nuts," "ridiculous," "out of control," and "just plain 'goofy.'" The revelations come as right-wing politicians "worry that angry evangelicals may stay home from the polls" because of the House leadership's mishandling of the Foley scandal. Kuo's new book reveals a conservative agenda which values crass politics over the "values" agenda. As E.J. Dionne writes, the current political climate presents a "national opportunity to break free from empty, politically driven rhetoric that has nothing to do with strengthening families and everything to do with electoral advantage."

NOT THE FIRST INSIDER CRITICISM: Kuo has criticized the administration's handling of faith-based programs before. In 2005, Kuo described the "minimal senior White House commitment to the faith-based agenda" during his time in the administration. Kuo bemoaned the lack of focus on poverty. "[The White House] never really wanted the 'poor people stuff,'" he wrote. Kuo was at one time the consummate right-wing insider. Keith Olbermann reported last night that during his stint at Jack Kemp's think tank, Empower America, "[Kuo] and his team taught more than 600 candidates how to run for office -- by blaming President Clinton for the nation's sad state of affairs at the time." John DiIulio, the head of the faith-based program until Aug. 2001, also spoke out against the administration's penchant for politics over policy. "What you’ve got is everything -- and I mean everything -- being run by the political arm," DiIulio said. "It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis." DiIulio, like Kuo, endeared himself to conservatives by attacking Clinton. "During the Clinton impeachment drama, he beat the drum for Clinton's removal from office and decried the failure to do so as a signal of the 'paganization' of American political culture."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real World May Become More Comfortable Than Closet
Posted by: mrtshw on Oct 18, 2006 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One must wonder if Condi is finally going to come out of the closet where she also undoubtedly stores her broom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Oct 18, 2006 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That little Jewish carpenter said: "As you do to the least of my brothers, so you do to me," or words to that effect. My message is that if you are going to quote the Bible, then quote ALL of it. You can't be "selective."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks frank Posted by: Dirtman
quote, 'They'll need to stick a "finger in the dike..."
Posted by: mum.rocks on Oct 18, 2006 3:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow I think the Republicans have enough sex scandals on their hands without doing that too!! ROFLMAO!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not surprised
Posted by: RisaRN on Oct 19, 2006 3:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really don't see how evangelicals could be surprised by this outcome. It was all about politics and getting the Christian vote from the beginning. None of those politicians can be trusted. What we really do is vote and hope for the best and pray it doesn't come back to bite us in the butt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]