Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The end of the evangelicals

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 1:48 PM on October 16, 2006.


The unspoken ballot measure
kuo
worship

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Ballot measures have mostly been a right wing affair; a mechanism for energizing voters mostly aware that their representatives are anything but:

We may not help you get or keep a job, keep you or your children out of wars, protect you from any number of dangers from disease to terrorism, but we can prevent gay people from getting married.

Writing in the Guardian UK, Alan Wolfe writes of the upcoming elections: "The question is not on any ballot but it is the question voters will be answering: has the religious right peaked?"

According to him, the answer is Yes:

Historically, evangelicals believed that religion and politics should be separate: one was holy, the other Satan's domain. But they put those convictions aside in the hopes that the Republican Party would change America's moral climate. It has not, and they are not happy.

It is precisely because conservative evangelicals pay more attention to issues involving sexuality than they do to economics or foreign policy that the Foley affair has become so important. It has become increasingly clear to many evangelicals that their alliance with the Republicans is not paying off: abortion is still legal (if more restricted); gays can still marry in one state and civil unions are spreading elsewhere; and opposition to stem cell research is a losing cause.

He also points to the Kuo revelations [VIDEO] which, he writes, "[show] what suckers conservative voters have been."

Digg!

Tagged as: evangelicals, 2006

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Excellent Points...but I'm not so Optimistic
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 16, 2006 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't it in 1992 that the evangelical movement in GOP politics was declared "dead??? Remember, we're dealing with a vast populace which has been entertained into submission and a populace which largely have been educated on a rout learning/fact-based basis -- void of critical thinking skills. Two years is a lifetime in American politics....memories are short and the next group of Tom Delays and Ralph Reeds are just waiting for their turn to start the next Republican Revolution. Also, I'm not sure that the Foley scandal will have the a total bombshell effect....the right wing media machine is frantically trying to spin this in every way imaginable: that there's a "cadre" of homosexual politicians who were trying to protect Foley....to the bizarre theory from James Dobson that naughty teenage boys are to blame.

At this point I'm more concerned about electronic voting corruption. There's so much on the progressive agenda...but paper-ballot initiatives should be job #1. We can't be endlessly diverted by the right's "culture wars."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Will Backfire on Kuo
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Oct 17, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not surprisingly, this has made not a bit of difference with die-hard evangelical voters - at least not enough to make a difference in November. There are still enough of them manning phones, stuffing envelopes, and talking in their churches about the evils of same-sex marriage and abortion, etc. Not enough is being said about how BushCo has been using them for their own ends.

The Rove propaganda machine is quite powerful, as we've all seen. It has sucked up many different people into it that have lots of influence and hundreds of millions of dollars. Those people have already climbed on board their control wagon. That makes them extremely powerful with respect to the 'regular voter'. That includes evangelical voters.

Kuo has opened up a can of worms, yet the polls prove that those people who tend toward herd mentality and us vs. them thinking structures will continue to vote Rethuglican NO MATTER WHAT. After all, they don't really care about reality. What's most important is their mythology and the survival of said mythology.

Just because Kuo has exposed the Bush admin for who they really are with respect to their real religious beliefs, it has MADE NOT AN IOTA OF DIFFERENCE in what voters will do in November. No sea change can occur because the Bush Team has already divided the nation substantially enough to make sure they will win. And the Dems have no interest in framing issues in such a way to make this a SERIOUS enough issue for them to win.

Don't forget. BushCo has successfully proven that tax cuts are the most important thing on the minds of Republican voters. The only way to help the needy and the poor in this country is to raise taxes and the Republicans know that. That will not happen as long as Rethuglican voters go to the polls in enough numbers. And they have the numbers.

When November comes, and the Rethuglicans have won once again, and they win because of good Christian churchgoers, they will prove once and for all that their money is NOT where their mouths are. The rich/poor divide in this country will grow wider. The churchgoers will blame the victim (eg, the poor are poor because they're bad and sinful) because they have no interest in actually reading the Bible to discover what Jesus said about the poor. Only Bush can tell them what's in the Bible now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]