Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Religious Right strangely silent about Foley

Posted by Bob Geiger at 8:41 AM on October 3, 2006.


The situational morals of the most pious among us
dobsonperkinswinky

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

If there's one thing you have to concede to America's Religious Right, it's that these folks have an amazing media and public relations network and can issue press releases, get on television and radio and, when they really want to, mobilize their lemming-like flock faster than Jack Abramoff can bribe a Republican Congressman.

And yet here we sit, four days after it was revealed that Republican Congressman Mark Foley was using the Internet to go after teenaged boys, and all you can hear from our own little version of the Taliban is dead quiet and crickets chirping.

Odd, isn’t it? The same people who can move their followers to boycott any company that believes gay people even have the right to exist, can't muster much outrage over one of their own preying on young boys and, more importantly, the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives ignoring it to save their political hides.

With the news out since Friday, James Dobson's Focus on the Family (FOF) still doesn’t say a word about it on their web site. In fact, if you go there right now and do a search on "Mark Foley," the closest thing you'll find citing Foley is a statement from March 2006 entitled More Funding Needed to Combat Child Porn.

They quote Foley in that piece as expressing concern that children will continue to be victimized if Congress does not act more proactively against child predators.

"We are still not funding it enough," they quote Foley as saying. "This is one of the most pervasive, dangerous elements in our society."

You just can't make this stuff up.

Meanwhile, the FOF site found plenty of time in their CitizenLink News Center to do 49 "news" stories in September covering a whole bunch of stuff including the presidential line-item veto, the Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act and rapidly urging members to "thank Gov. Schwarzenegger" for vetoing two pieces of California legislation "aimed at advancing the homosexual agenda" but that, to sane people, were really just simple antidiscrimination bills.

They also marshaled their forces to harangue U.S. Senators to confirm George W. Bush's judicial nominees and, as recently as Monday, publicized Pray for Children Weekend to promote "a drug-free and safe" life for children.

I guess to the folks at FOF, that doesn’t include getting indignant about children not being safe when they're preyed upon by a right-wing, church-going Republican.

Meanwhile, the ultraconservative Family Research Council (FRC) isn’t paying a lot more attention to this either. The FRC web site's banner headline on Monday remained Democrats Kill Parental Notification Bill in reference to a vote made by the Senate on Friday to shelve a bill that prohibited minors from going across state lines with a non-parental relative to get an abortion.

The most recent updates from FRC chief Tony Perkins' Washington Update are The ACLU versus America and Protecting Parents Rights to Notification, the latter charmingly promoted by the FRC as an issue so important that followers should "urge Senators to protect minor girls from abortion predators."

But there's just not much there about protecting teens from Republicans on Capitol Hill who admire their "cute butt(s)" and are willing to "…drive a few miles for a hot stud" like one of the young Congressional pages.

In fairness to the FRC, they did finally issue a press release from Tony Perkins late Monday, saying that he is "shocked by this spectacle of aberrant sexual behavior." They then turned right around and subtly placed the blame on the gay community, saying that "this is the end result of a society that rejects sexual restraints in the name of diversity."

The "letters campaign" section of Gary Bauer's amusingly-named American Values web site is still goading supporters to write to Washington about how much gay people are threatening heterosexual marriage -- but not a thing about one of their guys going after young boys on the Internet.

A quick check on the American Family Association finds them whipping their minions into a frenzy over Madonna Set To Mock The Crucifixion of Christ and urging them to collectively send one million e-mails to NBC to protest an upcoming Madonna appearance. They also continue their long history of anti-gay activity by prompting their 3.3 million supporters to keep boycotting Ford Motor Company due to what they allege is Ford's "funding homosexual groups and promoting homosexual marriage."

Finally, Jerry Falwell's National Liberty Journal newspaper is currently going after the interstate abortion bill and urging disciples to push the issue of "religious accommodation in public schools," while saying absolutely nothing about Mark Foley's adventures in pedophilia.

Of course, Falwell's the same pious dude who outed 'Tinky Winky' of the children's television show, Teletubbies, in the February 1999 edition of his newspaper and warned parents to keep their kids away from the show.

"He is purple - the gay-pride color; and his antenna is shaped like a triangle, the gay-pride symbol," wrote Falwell of his proof that it was only a matter of time before Tinky Winky moved to Massachusetts. "As a Christian I feel that role modeling the gay lifestyle is damaging to the moral lives of children."

So there you have it -- the true face of the Religious Right measured in deeds and not words.

They'll go out of their way to rally their followers to keep gay people from getting married, boycott corporations acknowledging that right, demonize legislators and judges who dare keep Church away from State and even attack children's-television characters.

But nary a word about a Republican Congressman, who is co-chairman of the Missing and Exploited Children’s Caucus, trolling for teen sex partners among Congressional pages, and being protected via a cover-up by the House Republican leadership.

I'm sure the letter-writing campaign to House Speaker Dennis Hastert will begin the minute they’ve taken care of that Madonna situation.

Digg!

Bob Geiger is a writer, activist and Democratic District Leader in Westchester County, NY. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at BobGeiger.com.


Conservatives Doctor Gore Audio Clip
The Right continues to smear Gore as a serial liar. This time by doctoring clips from a NPR interview.
Post by Steve Benen. May 11, 2008.
Republican Procedural Tactics Throw Mothers Under the Bus
Mothers are the latest casualty in attempts by the GOP to gum-up the works in congress.
Post by Julia . May 11, 2008.
Intelligence Contractor Wasn't Pleased When We Showed up at its Shareholder's Meet
We were shareholders, but apparently not the right kind.
Post by Tonya Hennessey. May 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Its not strange...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 3, 2006 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... they just don't care. Morals and ethics are for "the other guy" not for them. That is why we see so many moral crusaders... they all believe in their own holiness, even when they pay lip service to their own imperfection. They don't even bother looking out the window at much less clean up their own backyard before knocking on their neighbors' doors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

P'raps they expect folks to know better?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 3, 2006 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Odd, isn’t it?

If you need to be told that that sort of behavior is awful and abhorrent...well, ok:

"That sort of behavior is awful and abhorrent."

I hope that clears things up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the Faith Based Iniative stupid sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Oct 3, 2006 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
do you think foulwell, chicken Dobby Pat talks to god or is it god talks to Pat Robertson are going to bite the hand that feeds them? No way they never had it so good

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How High Up Exactly?
Posted by: midwestblue on Oct 3, 2006 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know the lockstep Republicans do not make a decision without clearing it with the higher-ups. I'll bet anything that Hastert did not make the decision to lay low without clearing it with Josh Bolten or someone higher up in this administration. A good investigative journalist could pursue this, but I doubt they would get very far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AFA's response: It's because he's GAY!
Posted by: skepsis on Oct 3, 2006 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only surprise is how long it took them to spin it.
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/10/afa/32006a.asp

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's the democratic campaign slogan
Posted by: rollo on Oct 3, 2006 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GOP: SHUT THE FUCK UP. We've heard enough out of you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

selective disgust
Posted by: kencohen on Oct 3, 2006 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is very interesting how the radical right seems to maintain selective outrage and effectively uses denial to retain their myths of morality and righteousness in the stark light of reality. Mark Foley goes into the same denial cloud that Rush Limbaugh fell into. The radical right sees Limbaugh's drug addiction as a medical problem and in the same breath will demonize drug addicts in general as parasitic vermin that need to be exterminated.
Given Hassert's refusal to take action when confronted with the ethical and criminal behavior of Foley, it appears the Republican leadership's behavior maintains the myths and denies reality. It is a slippery slope for them. If they start to come out of ether realizing they deny reality in favor of their self inflating myths, how will they react to realizing the true reality of Iraq??? How will they come to terms that they allowed Bush to hypnotize them into compliance as they sent their constituencies, country and Constitution down the river. Talk about repentence!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Young boys"?
Posted by: YogiBear on Oct 3, 2006 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, most of them were like 16. That's hardly a "boy," much less a "young boy." Perhaps you meant to say "young adults"? Or "teenage boys"?

I find the situation abhorrent myself, but that's no reason to exaggerate the claims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Young boys"? Posted by: ignition
» They were *UNDERAGE* Posted by: Truthsmack
» RE: They were *UNDERAGE* Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: "Young boys"?..sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
do more research
Posted by: sertelt on Oct 3, 2006 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently you folks need to do a little more research. I've already read statements from FRC, CWA, the National Clergy Council and several other pro-family groups on Foley. They were all sent out AFTER this article appeared here and anyone can quickly find the statements using Google News. We know your knee jerk reaction is to blame Christians for everything, but get your facts right next time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: do more research Posted by: ignition
» RE: do more research Posted by: Aim
I meant to say
Posted by: sertelt on Oct 3, 2006 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I meant to say this article was sent out after they posted their comments. My mistake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone notice that Karl Rove went to an area noted for child prostitution on his vacation?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 3, 2006 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a small item in the news, but he went with a few other "guys". Bet they had a "ball" (groan).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Writer has it both factually and tactically wrong
Posted by: kenhymes on Oct 3, 2006 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A: there has been quite a bit of comment in the press from right-wing Christians expressing their outrage, so the writer is inaccurately sweeping, even if the examples he cites have not commented.

B: the left should recognize that this is the long-awaited collapse of the unholy alliance between religious conservatives and business conservatives, and stop sniping. Be freaking happy when something goes your way, eh? The last thing to do is start attacking the people most likely to be doing some waking up right about now. Give them some space to digest this, and I think we can all be confident it's really bad news for the GOP and the neocons.

It's become a knee-jerk reaction to talk about the hypocrisy of the religious right, it's not analysis or really thought of any kind any more. The spectrum of American Christians is trending left, not right, and has always been complex and diverse. The left shoots itself in the foot when it attacks from a posture of ignorance and intolerance. You will ALWAYS be able to find examples of stupidity and hatred in the church, just as it is quite easy to find such examples in the Democratic Party and among leftist bloggers. Think smart, don't just mouth off pointlessly, or you will blow every opportunity that comes along. The goal is change, right? And ideas do change people, right? Or do you have some fantasy of killing all the Christians?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually... Posted by: ABetterFuture
When you scratch a neocon
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 3, 2006 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you always get a child predator, a closet molester, a liar, or a money grubbing pig. And you always get a shrub or a friend of a shrub.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two things missing
Posted by: courage on Oct 3, 2006 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This fine article is missing two important points:

#1 People who talk Righteous-ease are primary concerned about keeping the powerless in their place. So just as the women and children in Africa eat last, so do the women and children all over the world need to be kept "in their place." There's no better way to do it than in controlling the bodies of the less powerful.

#2 Foley ONLY apologized to his family and supporters. This is so typical of perpetrators who are "stepping down" from power. Those in the pulpit, likely to be protected by people like Mr. Land, will publicly apologize to their congregations and family, at best, often hoping and expecting that they will be "forgiven without consequences" and "restored." All too often, their expectations are realized.

Historically, both writers and bystanders in every role have not seen that the direct victims are the ones most deserving of a public apology, one that does not name the r direct victims unless those victims have already identified themselves publicly. Why is something, so simple and so obvious, so seldom done and so seldom required?

Dee Miller
www.takecourage.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two things missing Posted by: Halaby
SBC also silent
Posted by: christa77 on Oct 3, 2006 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prominent Southern Baptist leaders also choose silence over protecting kids. At least 18 Southern Baptist leaders were recently informed about a substantiated report of a minister's sexual abuse of a minor girl, but the man was allowed to remain in ministry. It was sexual contact, not emails, and another SB minister swore an affidavit about his knowledge of it. Yet, the man remained in ministry. Where is the outrage over this? Where is the committee that will investigate all those who had knowledge and did nothing? Where is there any Southern Baptist process for accountability? www.stopbaptistpredators.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SBC also silent Posted by: outsidea
Shocked and outraged
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Oct 4, 2006 2:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to this article for bringing the hypocrisy of the Religious Right to our attention.

Of course, now I have to change my whole belief system...And remove the 50-foot statue of Dr. Dobson from my front yard (The bad comb-over by itself weighs 200+ lbs!).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real 'sin'
Posted by: wawa on Oct 4, 2006 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real 'sin' here is really what 'sin' is all about:

SELFISHNESS

Putting one's own needs, desires, lusts before giving thought to how it will
effect/de-humanize/objectify another is the root of Foley's 'sin'.

That he is an idiot is one more reason WE THE PEOPLE must RISE UP and take back Congress-
what We the People need is a Third Political Party that seeks to SERVE, and NOT be served

That the RR is mute is a blessing and hopefully the beginning of the END of the media giving the fundamentalist's a voice.

The RR do NOT speak-and have NEVER represented Progressive Christians, who ARE on the RISE.

-eileen fleming, Christian of the Beatitudes, agitator church and state, author, reporter and editor WAWA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real 'sin' Posted by: outsidea
Sadness and Gut Wrenching Disgust
Posted by: Snott on Oct 4, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can understand the hot tempers and "ah-ha! Gottcha!" that's happening, but one thing I will say is that the circus that's going on right now is also disgusting. I am Catholic and am still trying to sort out my relationship to a church that knowingly harbored and covered up the reprehensible actions of some priests. If these fellas have drug or alcohol problems that diminish their judgement and they resultingly engage in harmful behavior, I'd like to know where their friends and buddies were as the problems emerged? A friend would look after the health and well-being of his companion, not sweep it under the rug.

I'm going to use the dreaded word that people shy away from that tends to "brand" one with handy stereotypes - SIN. I'm better able to understand what that means as I grow older. One thing I've discovered it's like "pollution" that taints whatever is around it. It ruins wholesome relationships, and wrecks havoc on lives. As Catholics, in Mass we ask forgiveness of sins we have made "in what I have done and what I have failed to do." Note that failure to act can also be sinful.

But while everyone is gloating over this discovery, pointing fingers and generally, spreading the nastiness around a lot, let's remember these words meant for us all - "Let the one among you with no sin be the first to cast the stone."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Making Excuses ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
Yesterday Randi Rhodes ...
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Oct 4, 2006 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... who can do very good work when she wants to ...

used this case as a pretext to spend most of the day shrilling and raving about HomoEROTIC SADO-Masochism in the Republican Party.

OK ... this IS Talk Radio , so slightly different reality rules apply:

1) We've got a case of indecent phone sex between inappropriately aged partners.

2) Jeff Gannon ... an imitiation journalist and Republican shill give Press Corps status at the White House was ALSO, by all accounts what Randi likes to call "A Male Escort" -- the guy was a 'husler' ... he did sex with men for money and posed on his own pornographic web site.

AND

3) The torture at Abu Grahaib had these HOMOerotic SADO-masochistic elements ...

See .... says Randi ... it all FITS TOGETHER ... it's all part of the same depraved Republican psyche thingie !!!!

Some time next week, she'll be castigating as homophobes for opposing Marriage Equality.

Speaking as a past president of the National Leather Associaiton NYC Chapter -- I find this stuff offensive and hurtful. (Not to mention that it gives the Log Cabin a-holes one more thing to sneer at straight liberals about.)

Just to clear a few things up:
The interrogators at Abu Ghrahaib didn't use male nudity to get their faggot freak on ... the theory, right or wrong, was that Moslem men were even more body shy and homophobic than southern Baptist farmboys -- hence, a little forced masturbation was thought to induce the maximum stress with minimum actual tissue damage. ('Stress Positions" on the other hand while quite chaste, can be taken to the point of suffocation and tissue necrosis in the large muscles. We are outraged by naked people piles, but utterly sanguine about wrist-to-ankle fetal position cuffing. Go figure)

And, whereas girls do not start having partnered penile sex of their own accord until 16 or 17 years of age ... boys DO typically start masturbating with or without instruction from others somewhere betweeen age 10 and age 13 -- and they begin to have a good idea if they're straight or gay about the same time.

And then there's the "Horatio Alger" and "Batman and Robin" fantasies. For straight boys its about the wealth, power and mystery ... for gay boys -- add 'sex with an Alpha male figure," as part of the allure. Where straight boys of 16 or thereabouts fantasize about an idealized 20-something 'Aunt Peg' type as a sexual initiator ... gay boys are less stereotyped -- the "Bruce Wayne" daddy-type may very well be the ideal partner of choice, from the boy's point of view.

And bringing it back to the Foley case ... we are talking about text-messaged phonesex -- not sodomistical frolics in the Bat Cave.

It's an Athenian sex comedy ... the ludicrous spectacle of a mature man besotted with a youth who ruins his health, fortune and reputation in persuit of a coy and elusive lad ... not a Greek Tragedy were the innocent victim of Destiny (or a god's cruel prank) has to tear his eyes out or eat his children cooked in a stew.

But what the hell ... "any stick will beat a dog", right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yesterday Randi Rhodes ... Posted by: AstraeaLibra
Booze Made Him Do it!
Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon on Oct 4, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That old excuse. What a crock!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets Take The High Ground
Posted by: BAKslider on Oct 5, 2006 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the previous poster. We do not need to be slamming the Christian right for waking up. These are the people who do think about moral issues. If we approach them with compassion instead of invective, we may bring a few into the fold of the true peacemakers. Keep in mind that the teachings of Jesus (not Paul or Old Testament) dovetail nicely with progressive values - not the GOP. The Dems need to give people of faith a menu to choose from that supports at least some of their agenda. Jesus taught compassion and forgiveness - let's try a bit eh?

Greg Forest

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Foley knew first hand...
Posted by: rebeers01 on Oct 5, 2006 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who else would be better to comment on child pornography than an experienced child predator?

Good job, Republicans, digging a grave (hopefully) deep enough to get you guys out of power for a long time...

Oh, and for covering up a sexual predator. Great job. Good stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]