Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

UPDATED: Conservatives helping sink 9/11 film

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 1:38 PM on September 8, 2006.


Rumors are flying... take action

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Update: Make your voice heard HERE... just enter your info and they'll call Robert Iger's office for you.

***

Thinkprogress has compiled conservative opposition to ABC's Path to 9/11. Meanwhile, unconfirmed rumors are spreading that ABC is canceling the movie

  • John Podhoretz, conservative columnist and Fox News contributor:

    The portrait of Albright is an unacceptable revision of recent history and an unfair mark on a public servant who, no matter her shortcomings, doesn’t deserve to be remembered by millions of Americans as the inadvertent (and truculent) savior of Osama bin Laden. Samuel Berger, Clinton’s national security adviser, also seems to have just cause for complaint.

  • James Taranto, OpinionJournal.com editor:

    The Clintonites may have a point here. A few years ago, when the shoe was on the other foot, we were happy to see CBS scotch "The Reagans."

  • Dean Barnett, conservative commentator posting on Hugh Hewitt’s blog:

    One can (if one so chooses) give the filmmakers artistic license to [fabricate a scene]. But if that is what they have done, conservative analysts who back this movie as a historical document will mortgage their credibility doing so.

  • Chris Wallace, Fox News Sunday anchor: When you put somebody on the screen and say that’s Madeleine Albright and she said this in a specific conversation and she never did say it, I think it’s slanderous, I think it’s defamatory and I think that ABC and Disney should be held to account.
  • Captain’s Quarters blog:

    If the Democrats do not like what ABC wants to broadcast, they have every right to protest it — and in this case, they had a point.

  • Bill Bennett, conservative author, radio host, and TV commentator: Look, "The Path to 9/11" is strewn with a lot of problems and I think there were problems in the Clinton administration. But that’s no reason to falsify the record, falsify conversations by either the president or his leading people and you know it just shouldn’t happen.

For sources and more quotes go to Thinkprogress...

Digg!

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
ABOUT THE GREAT DOCUDRAMA
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 8, 2006 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone have any idea how many e-mails and other means of contact it took to get ABC and Disney and all concerned to pay attention. Just curious. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeez
Posted by: fifthworld on Sep 8, 2006 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This won't make brunowe very happy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ABCs of 9/11
Posted by: dainin on Sep 8, 2006 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The official story of September 11th is comprised of two reports. The first of these, the 9/11 Commission Report, gives the government’s overall version of what happened that day and why. However, it is somewhat misleading to call this report the “official story” as the Commission’s executive director and de facto member of the Bush Administration, Philip Zelikow, controlled the entire investigation as well as the writing of the report. Most of the 9/11 Commission members were simply there to present an appearance of unanimity. Therefore the official story is not representative of work done by the US government as a whole, but is largely the view of the Bush Administration.

The Commission’s story has been shown to be entirely false due to lies of omission and distortion. One significant event their report omitted entirely was the collapse of WTC 7. They left explanation for this disaster, and the collapse of the towers, to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for publication as the second half of the official story, the NIST WTC report. This second report is a direct product of the Bush Administration, with cabinet member Carlos Gutierrez’ name emblazoned on page one. Of course NIST itself is a government agency whose directors are also Presidential appointees. Those relying on this report always fail to note the fact that the leaders of NIST’s WTC investigation were appointed directly by George W. Bush.

This fact should remind us that the Bush Administration has been criticized heavily for their disdain of science. The House Committee on Government Reform found “numerous instances where the Administration has manipulated the scientific process and distorted or suppressed scientific findings.” A group of leading scientists, now including 49 Nobel laureates, 63 National Medal of Science recipients, and 175 members of the National Academies, has said that the Bush Administration engages in “distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]