Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Gore: Democracy is under attack

Posted by Melissa McEwan at 11:32 AM on August 28, 2006.


Al tells is like it is.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In Edinburgh to promote An Inconvenient Truth, Gore minced no words: "In my country and others around the world democracy is under attack."

"There's a feeling in the US on the part of many that the way democracy operates today is very different from the system we learned about in school."
He said that democracy, which he described as a "conversation", was now "more controlled and centralised", and that the most important role of the media was to facilitate democracy.
Gore said American politicians were spending their time raising funds at small gatherings and cocktail parties because, "the only thing that matters in American politics now is having enough money to put 30-second commercials on air to persuade the voters to elect or re-elect you."
Gore added that the internet offers "the promise of recreating a meritocracy of ideas." Let it be as you say, sir.

Also, when Gore was asked the recently popular question of whether Bush is stupid, he replied, "I don't think he's unintelligent at all. He's incurious ... there's a puzzling lack of curiosity," proving once again that he is not only a scholar, but a gentleman. Because if I had been subjected to repeated charges that I was "too brainy" and "too wonky" and "too professorial" etc. like he was by the media in 2000, only to have them ask six long years later whether Bush is stupid, I would have screamed, "Fuck youuuuuuuu, assholes!" just before my head exploded.

(Crossposted at Shakespeare's Sister.)

Digg!

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Murdoch and Murdoch Flak Confused About Racism, Truth
What must it be like to do spin for News Corps?
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
'big media' eroding democratic process
Posted by: aurora2484 on Aug 28, 2006 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NYT adds a few more interesting details today under "Gore lashes out at media consolidation". They note that he sees "ever-tighter political and economic control of the media [as] a major threat to democracy".

(They also refer to Al's 2000 presidential election loss as "in disputed circumstances", while Yahoo say only that he lost the election).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please run again, Mr. Gore!
Posted by: Lizmv on Aug 28, 2006 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a man (yeah, I don't think we are ready for a woman) of extremely high intelligence who has LOTS of curiosity, who knows how to do his OWN homework, and who has the ability to THINK THINGS THROUGH, for our next president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please run again, Mr. Gore! Posted by: aurora2484
Stick to the subject already
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Aug 30, 2006 12:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could we be spared of the Al please run, and the Al Gore sucks/Democrats suck debate we get a bazillion times here?

The subject at hand is democracy, Al Gore's comments on that and the media and on Bush, and what the author of the article said.

Could we have a more interesting discussion worthy of the meritocracy of ideas Gore proposes for our national discourse instead of the same old agenda laden histrionics about Al Gore?

Please... please? Would that be too much to ask?

Please, if you're not a troll of some type, raise the level of discussion. Thank you.

This has been a public service announcement by a loyal reader of alternet.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]