Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Terrorism, conservative Christian-style

Posted by Melissa McEwan at 1:50 PM on June 9, 2006.


Who would Jesus bomb?
marylandplate
mdplate

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Maryland police have arrested Robert F. Weiler Jr. who, by his own admission, had made a pipe bomb to bomb an abortion clinic and stolen a .40-caliber handgun to "shoot doctors who provided abortions." A car outside his home bears a license plate frame reading "Choose Life" and "God is Pro-Life."

While police were trying to dismantle the bomb, it exploded and burned the top floor of Weiler's friend's home, where it had been stashed, but no one was injured.

This incident comes on the heels of homemade chemical weaponry being employed to prevent the opening of an adult bookstore in Florida.

This is what happens when we, as a culture, tolerate eliminationist rhetoric and treat it as legitimate discourse. I wish liberals would get half as excised about the steady stream of eliminationist speech directed at us as the wingnuts do about the phrase "Happy Holidays." They've turned that into the foundation for a "War on Christmas" perpetrated by secular liberals, which is, year after year, discussed far and wide, successfully aligning us with a cultural shift rooted in language usage, in spite of the reality that their continual diarrheic stream of hate speech has fundamentally altered the landscape of acceptable discourse, thereby mainstreaming violent expressions of dissent with liberal ideals.

We malign the media for internalizing the charge that they have a liberal bias, and the Dems for internalizing the charge that they are too liberal, and yet many of us have internalized the negative associations of PC-ism so thoroughly that we reject any impulse to be resoundingly and uncompromisingly intolerant of eliminationist rhetoric directed at us, having lost all ability to acknowledge that language means something. We’re so keen to distance ourselves from the charge of being language police that we are too often reluctant to defend ourselves. Sure, we get mad about individual incidents, but we have yet to mount a sustained and steadfast campaign to reject these attacks on us. The martyrs of the Christian right who claim persecution for much less have already made headway with creating the illusion that there is a War on Christians (and that we're already at war), and yet most Americans--including many liberals--would deny the existence of a "war" on liberals and liberalism, in spite of plenty of evidence to the contrary.

And now, as the extreme right gets agitated about their fading dreams of Dominionism, hopes for its realization once placed in President Bush now undermined by his lame duckitude, we are beginning to see the first signs that the violent suggestions, repeatedly espoused by the media shills who serve as conduit between extreme and mainstream, are being made reality by their devotees. The line between rhetoric and action is not some gossamer fantasy born of some unhinged alarmism on my part; history informs us that this result is inevitable. We must take this seriously--and we can’t close our eyes to it and trust that, eventually, they will just discredit themselves and we will take back Congress and then everything will be fine. People who use eliminationist language when they are winning are not going to become silent in the face of defeat. Something ugly has metastasized on the right in the past few years, and as we face the prospect of electoral gains, we're going to have to be more vigilant about not allowing ourselves to be treated as targets by our opponents, not less.

(Hat tip to Ann at Feministing; crossposted at Shakespeare's Sister.)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Digg!

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes!
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Jun 9, 2006 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're so correct, and we have to start calling the hatemongers on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well said
Posted by: jstillwater on Jun 9, 2006 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wishing death on liberals as a group has become an issue in its own right, independent of the many points of disagreement between right and left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well said Posted by: jstillwater
» RE: Well said Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle
» RE: Well said Posted by: davewuxi
A Linguistic Adventure
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle on Jun 9, 2006 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To summarize one underlying point behind the article, the words 'Democrat', 'liberal', and 'leftist' are all interchangeable with one another, and all percieved by the public at large as grave insults - at least here in America. I believe someone here once said something to the effect of, "To be called liberal is an indictment." That's very true, and perhaps why those left of center are too afraid to stand up for themselves. It's not like leaping into a fight uninjured and ready to strike, it's like having somebody hobble you with a sledgehammer before a boxing match and then expecting you to get a knockout.

Thanks to the political language we use here in America, and thanks more so to how it's been manipulated - largely through mass media outlets - someone who dares to carry the title of 'liberal', 'leftist', or 'Democrat' is instantly nothing short of a criminal and a supporter of a hideous, maniacal ideology that threatens the American way of life... somehow. Meanwhile, titles such as 'Republican', 'conservative', and 'right-wing' are synonymous with strength, righteousness, holiness, and to those of us who are wise to this game, furious indignation. To me, this discredits both sides. Who would you rather be, an amoral, brainless, godless, communistic liberal; or a raging, maniacal, bible-thumping conservative fascist?

Language does mean something. It means a ton, and we usually take it for granted that words are so incredibly powerful. What shall we do, though? Embrace the terminology and try to restore the good name of leftists and centrists everywhere, or abandon the terminology and remake our political identities? Perhaps we could do with a little bit of both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EXCELLENT Entry, Melissa
Posted by: kwfryatl on Jun 10, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Melissa, I really hope you read your Comments section: I believe this is, by far, the best thing you have ever written here. Focused, insightful, extremely well written - and adult.

For me, when addressing the insanity (and its perpetrators) that is going in our society, I believe we have to better than "Them" - the level of discourse and conversation has to be raised in working towards solutions/healing.

I'm sure someone is going to comment something to the effect of, "Well, there's just no talking to irrational people . . . ", but, unfortunately, that's really no excuse. While it's true that we shouldn't try to teach a pig to sing (because it wastes our time and it annoys the pig), that doesn't mean that we should stop singing! ;o)

As Einstein said, "You don't solve the problem at the level of the problem."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: XCELLENT Entry, Melissa Posted by: Melissa McEwan
Chasing them away
Posted by: sailships on Jun 11, 2006 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if the Conservative Christians realize that they are chasing the people they say they are trying to win over away?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Warnings from a former fundamentalist
Posted by: terradea on Jun 12, 2006 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former born-again fundamentalist pentecostal "christian" I sat through many sermons demanding that christians "take up their swords and shields" to fight satan (aka secular humanists). It was "onward christian soldiers" every Sunday and, unable to twist jesus' own words into a battle cry, they used the words of the militant apostles and king james to call for death in the name of god. There were thousands in attendance every week, crying, rolling in the aisles and speaking in tongues. THOUSANDS, in my one single megachurch, many fringe lunatics who were accepted no where as they were accepted there. Please take these zealots seriously. They are "filled with the holy spirit," shun education, and will do whatever the holy spirit (aka Falwell, Robertson, GWBush) tells them to do. These spirit-filled hate-mongers use the right code words ("wonder working power," etc.) to gather the forces against evil, and then they define evil as they deem necessary. Our only hope is to make non-zealots aware of the danger and to neutralize the impact of this christian army. How? Stop being polite. Stop accepting "praise jesus" or "god bless" as common benign plesantries. Stop accepting or respecting this religious movement. These people are terrorists and will not hesitate to kill you and your spawn in the name of the lord when the time is right. I've seen it in action and I am scared to death of these wolves in sheeple clothing. You all should be too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRECISELY
Posted by: Roverton on Jun 12, 2006 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How Christ would NOT command his peoples!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ROCK ON, MELISSA!
Posted by: LynnZTV on Jun 17, 2006 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last line of that piece should be typed up and placed on a mirror, so that you have to look yourself in the eyes and read it every morning, in order to live it every day. Outstanding!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]