Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Courage of Lieutenant Watada

Posted by Bob Geiger at 9:39 AM on June 7, 2006.


Army officer refuses to support "illegal and immoral war"

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

"Courage is the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees the others" ~ Aristotle

When Lieutenant Ehren Watada's Army unit from Fort Lewis, WA leaves for Mosul in northern Iraq this month, he will not be among them. The 28-year-old Army officer will formally refuse today to ship out when his unit deploys to Iraq.

"I refuse to be silent any longer. I refuse to watch families torn apart, while the President tells us to 'stay the course,'" said Watada, on a web site supporting his cause. "I refuse to be party to an illegal and immoral war against people who did nothing to deserve our aggression."

Watada faces being court martialed for refusing to serve as ordered, unless the Army allows him to resign his commission or assigns him elsewhere, in a capacity unrelated to the war in Iraq. The young officer, who attempted to resign his commission in January -- his request was denied -- is not eligible for conscientious-objector status as he does not object to all wars, just the one the Bush administration is conducting in Iraq.

"My son has a great deal of courage, and clearly understands what is right, and what is wrong," said his father, Bob Watada. "He's choosing to do the right thing, which is a hard course."

As a Veteran, I agree and, with most polls showing up to 70 percent of Americans believing the Iraq war is a mistake, it will be interesting to see where public sentiment goes on cases like Watada's. But just wait for the right-wing types -- especially the old Republican Chickenhawks who have never served in uniform or the young ones who never will -- to pillory this courageous young man and cast him as a coward.

But Watada is no coward. Deploying with his unit to a war he knows is wrong and that is harming our country in so many ways would be the easy thing to do. There's a vast difference between being afraid to fight and knowing not only that a cause is unjust, but that both Americans and Iraqis are dying based on a long list of lies used to justify this war.

Rather than simply going and accepting what is, statistically speaking, a rather small chance of being killed or wounded, Lt. Watada is choosing a far more difficult course, that may lead him to prison and vilification by a sickeningly misguided percentage of our population.

"I think they will do their best to make an example of me," Watada said.

As an officer, it is Watada's job to lead men and women into battle and he is entirely right in refusing to do that if he cannot do it with a clear and righteous conscience.

"I feel that we have been lied to and betrayed by this administration," Watada said Tuesday. "It is the duty, the obligation of every soldier, and specifically the officers, to evaluate the legality, the truth behind every order — including the order to go to war."

And so a gutsy young man does the right thing and not necessarily the easy thing in a country that too often absorbs itself in ill-advised, rote patriotism.

Confucius said that "faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage" and Watada will most assuredly not leave opposing the needless deaths of more military personnel and civilians undone.

"I wanted to be there for my fellow troops," said Watada. "But the best way was not to help drop artillery and cause more death and destruction. It is to help oppose this war and end it so that all soldiers can come home."

You can show your support for Lt. Watada by going here and signing a petition applauding his actions.

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Digg!

Bob Geiger is a writer, activist and Democratic District Leader in Westchester County, NY. You can reach Bob at geiger.bob@gmail.com and read more from him at Democrats.com.


Republican Procedural Tactics Throw Mothers Under the Bus
Mothers are the latest casualty in attempts by the GOP to gum-up the works in congress.
Post by Julia . May 11, 2008.
Intelligence Contractor Wasn't Pleased When We Showed up at its Shareholder's Meet
We were shareholders, but apparently not the right kind.
Post by Tonya Hennessey. May 10, 2008.
Missouri Nuns Fight Voter Disenfranchisement
After their Indiana sisters were disenfranchised, Missouri nuns are mad as heck and not gonna take it anymore.
Post by Jill Hussein C.. May 9, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A TRUE HERO!
Posted by: woodford54 on Jun 7, 2006 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have already gone to his site and written my opinion. I am so proud to know that we have young people who will not let their morals, integrity, and sense of compassion be destorted by becoming disposable killing machines for an EVIL regime. I have long supported the Refuseniks in Israel and will stand with any movement in this country that involves military personnel "just saying no!" This guy is so much braver than we are. If we were half as brave, he would not even be having to make this decision. We do you stand and who are you standing with? I know that one day his children and grandchildren will be SO proud of him, as I hope his family is now. I am!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A TRUE HERO! Posted by: Houtx
» RE: A TRUE HERO! Posted by: woodford54
» RE: A TRUE HERO! Posted by: trampoline
So, what are the rest of you going to do?
Posted by: Knowmad on Jun 7, 2006 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An honourable stance by a brave young man, which will accomplish absolutely nothing - except the destruction of yet another young life by your so decent and selfless administration - unless you Americans get off your "poor me" butts and use the opportunity as a rallying cry.

C'mon already, you're being abused, increasingly, daily, and it's not going to change unless the individual does something about it, as Ehren Watada so courageously sets the example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proof is in the Pudding
Posted by: sebas on Jun 7, 2006 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last time I checked: during wartime the maximum penalty for disobeying orders is execution. He's a coward? Not even close

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

legality not at issue
Posted by: absentee on Jun 7, 2006 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only to the most uninformed is the legality of the war in Iraq in question. It is clearly legal, having been approved by Congress through funding, and by the UN Security council. In which case, his entire grounds is that he disagrees with all of the worldwide authorities and those directly in his command. In other words, he hasn't a legal leg to stand on. Courageous or cowardly, who knows? The word I'm thinking of is "blundering".

This youth has done nothing more than succumb to the temptation of emotional grandstanding. Not smart.

And yes, I'm a conservative Republican veteran. Having spent six years in the Marine Corps without meeting a single democrat, I find it frankly hilarious how dems try to coopt service as a liberal trait, while championing those who undermine that same service. Laughable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The invasion is illegal Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: absentee
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: absentee
» One last comment Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: jstillwater
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: absentee
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: jstillwater
» RE: The invasion is illegal Posted by: absentee
Desertion
Posted by: WSHancock on Jun 7, 2006 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly, he wants to be a martyr. The Army should oblige him by imposing the penalty provided for. Stand him up against a wall and give him his wish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

KristopherBattles
Posted by: KJBattles on Jun 7, 2006 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot understand why a young man who joined the Army and accepted a commission as an officer and a leader (AFTER the war started, by the way), would so willfully defy lawful orders.

He is not being asked to massacre civilians, which would truly be an unlawful order. The war is neither immoral nor illegal, as it is fought to overthrow a dictator and destroy terrorists, and was authorized by both Congress and the UN.

He therefore is defying lawful orders in a time of war, which is punishable by death.

He is also holding a press conference with the apparent intent to inspire others to follow his example. For an officer, this is not dissent, but sedition. (I got the following from the Uniform Code of Military Justice):

894. ART. 94. MUTINY OR SEDITION
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who--
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court- martial may direct.
---
It's as if the nation has taken some drug, and has ceased to understand duty, honor, or respect for authority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: KristopherBattles Posted by: woodford54
» RE: KristopherBattles Posted by: KJBattles
This is all you need to know about Watada ...
Posted by: WesleyMouch on Jun 7, 2006 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Watada claims that the current war is illegal. Interestingly, he joined the Army in June 2003, after we had invaded Iraq (so the concept that he might have to go there shouldn't have come as a surprise to him); his obligation ends in December of this year."

If he is so strongly convinced that this war is wrong, why did he join the Army in the first place? Regardless of how you feel about the war, you have to admit that there is something suspect about his sudden objection to the war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, let me get this straight...
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle on Jun 7, 2006 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He joins the army after the war starts, and then suddenly refuses to deploy because of the questionable morality of the war, which has been evident for quite some time now... I really have to ask, what was he thinking when he joined the military, and what the hell is he thinking now? He's probably going to be strung up for this, or at least jailed. I have to agree that this guy is trying to be a martyr, and the government is going to make quite the example out of him... What a waste.

I can't help but wonder just what he's trying to accomplish. This isn't heroic, this is stupid. I'm every bit as opposed to the war as this guy, but he seems a bit off-center. You know, like he really didn't think at all about his reasons for joining the military or what his responsibilities would be as a soldier, and now he's having some serious second thoughts - and shouting them from the rooftops as loud as he can, for whatever reason.

Well, at any rate I'm sure he'll get what he's after, and then some. He'll be loved as a hero by the left, hated as a deserter by the right, and those of the center will collectively sigh and shake their heads... I'll begin the sighing and head-shaking routine in advance so I can get it out of the way early. This is going to get ugly quick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe it was stupid to enlist...
Posted by: superdan on Jun 7, 2006 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... but the idea that once you have done something stupid, you have to keep on doing the same stupid thing or you are a "coward" is, well, stupid.
Maybe he took the your idiot president at his word with regards to "nation building" and WMDs. Is it that inconceivable that a young man believed the words of his commander in chief?
To then keep on "staying the course", no matter what lies have been told, no matter what the moral cost, no matter how many revelations come out about civilian casualites, abuse and murder.. THAT is cowardice.
Kia Kaha Lt Watada.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I disagree
Posted by: Dkelsmith on Jun 7, 2006 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I respectfully disagree with the notion that Lieutenant watada is showing "courage" in refusing to deploy. While I do know first hand that many of us in the military have differing opinions about the Iraq war, the point of the matter is that we all swore an oath of enlistment, or a commissioning oath. I am a good deal older than 1LT Watada, but I am the same rank. I began my military career as an enlisted Soldier 16 years ago, and I completed OCS 3 years ago.

One thing that I realize from being on both sides of the house is the fact that any Officer worth his salt puts the needs of his men before himself. We eat last, sleep last, and go home....last. I have hard time respecting his opinion because he is content to stay behind as his men go forward. If I thought the mission and the cause was completely ate up. And if I had no faith in my leadership, and had poor equipment with which to complete the mission I would STILL go where my men went. Besides the oath I swore, I have a deeper obligation for the welfare of my men....they go nowhere without me to guide them. That is what I do not respect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I disagree Posted by: trampoline
» RE: I disagree Posted by: absentee
» RE: I disagree Posted by: trampoline
» RE: I disagree Posted by: absentee
» RE: I disagree Posted by: trampoline
» RE: I disagree Posted by: absentee
» RE: I disagree Posted by: absentee
» RE: I disagree Posted by: trampoline
» RE: I disagree Posted by: absentee
» RE: I disagree Posted by: trampoline
» RE: I disagree Posted by: absentee
Jack Hamilton
Posted by: Jack Hamilton on Jun 7, 2006 11:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read your post regarding Captain Watada I immediately wondered how a person could be so wrong.
I noticed how you easily pigeon hole people that might disagree with you and marginalize them by calling them Chicken Hawke that way it is so much easier to dismiss there opinion. I want to clear something up right off the bat I vehemently disagree with his decision I am older but I served in the Vietnam War and lost my left leg on my second tour. Your comments about what kind of danger he would be in depends on what kind of unit he serves with. He will be in a lot more danger if he serves with an infantry company like the 2nd 502 101st then if he is assigned to say Hq’s company of some rear support unit and is not out there on the street where the metal meats the meat. Other comments seem to indicate that the hundreds of thousands doing there duty don’t know right from wrong. The fact is that every soldier faced with a deployment that is dangerous and filled with hardship face the same apprehensions as Captain Watada the thoughts of leaving family and friends for the uncertainty of War. But these men must have taken a different oath than the Captain. The one that says “I will obey the orders of my superiors” not just if I agree with them. It appears that the Captain accepted his commission after the war had begun and was late at arriving at his new found convictions. He says that he feels “that he has been lied to” If every GI refused to obey an order based on what they feel we might still have slavery or you would be doing the old Heil Hitler salute. The captain says “I wanted to be there for my fellow troops.” Apparently he did not want to be there bad enough. No your conclusions are wrong the vast majority of veterans will know they are wrong and will understand what it is that truly motivated the captain. When called upon to do his duty he could not bring himself to leave the comfort of hearth and home to be there with his men he left it for someone else to take his place and do his job. I fear that beneath the captains breast beats the heart of a shirker and coward. If justice is done he will be court marshaled and dishonorably discharged and do about five to ten in Ft. Leavenworth. I am more than sure you picked the wrong guy to try and make a hero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: woodford54
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: jstillwater
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: richardpmendola
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: trampoline
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: Jack Hamilton
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: richardpmendola
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: Jack Hamilton
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: Jack Hamilton
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: Jack Hamilton
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: trampoline
» RE: Jack Hamilton Posted by: Jack Hamilton
This low life is a TRAITOR !!!!
Posted by: NY Currency Trader on Jun 8, 2006 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he's not shot by Army firing squad, let's see if he ever gets a job. Freedom will prevail !!!

May God continue to bless America, and the George W. Bush administration !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The morality of war
Posted by: YogiBear on Jun 8, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Army officer refuses to support "illegal and immoral war"

I respect him for sticking up for his ideals, but truth be told, when has war ever been moral? I could fight in the wrong war, since all wars are wrong to a degree and the soldier's job is not to make those decisions. With all the murkiness surrounding political action, who will ever know if any war is just or unjust?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The morality of war Posted by: Jack Hamilton
» Which direction is south? Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Which direction is south? Posted by: Jack Hamilton
» RE: Which direction is south? Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: The morality of war Posted by: richardpmendola
» RE: The morality of war Posted by: Jack Hamilton