Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

NY man fights for "right" to be a deadbeat dad

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein at 6:05 AM on March 9, 2006.


Says choice voids child support.
4261
Deadbeat dad

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Steve Gilliard points to a news item about a 25-year-old man who's going to court under the banner of "men's rights" to argue for the right to cut off his unwanted daughter because abortion rights negate child support obligations.

NEW YORK - Contending that women have more options than they do in the event of an unintended pregnancy, men's rights activists are mounting a long shot legal campaign aimed at giving them the chance to opt out of financial responsibility for raising a child.

The National Center for Men has prepared a lawsuit — nicknamed Roe v. Wade for Men — to be filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Michigan on behalf of a 25-year-old computer programmer ordered to pay child support for his ex-girlfriend's daughter. The suit addresses the issue of male reproductive rights, contending that lack of such rights violates the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause.

The gist of the argument: If a pregnant woman can choose among abortion, adoption or raising a child, a man involved in an unintended pregnancy should have the choice of declining the financial responsibilities of fatherhood. The activists involved hope to spark discussion even if they lose. [Yahoo]
Yes. let's discuss the sophistry of this nuisance suit. A dad says he shouldn't have to pay child support because his ex-girlfriend could have aborted his daughter, but didn't. Basically, he's saying that acknowledging women's inalienable right to control their own bodies must be counterbalanced by some kind of countervailing threat of destitution in order to make the whole setup "fair." What all this has to do with the equal protection clause is beyond me--if the deadbeat were the custodial parent, the mother of his child would presumably have to pay child support. That's what we call equal protection.

[NewsBlog]

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Digg!

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Hard-liners Peddle Zombie Lies About Immigrants and Crime
A new report flies in the face of 100 years of data showing immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes than the native-born.
Post by Walter Ewing. November 22, 2009.
Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?