Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Oscar controversy

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 12:14 PM on February 14, 2006.


Is it Palestinian or just from the Palestinian Authority?
15
paradise now

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Wow, a real Oscar controversy... not just a bitchy comment about an abominable dress but a real live conflict on a global political scale...

It surrounds the fact that Paradise Now, nominated for Best Foreign Language film, was initially listed by the Academy as being "Palestinian."

As with many films these days (as well as cars, blenders, computers and even some food) PN is of mixed provenance. Gabriel writes: "[PN has] an Israeli Arab director, Israeli actors, a Palestinian crew and locations, a Jewish Israeli producer, and private European funding."

But two separate campaigns have been launched regarding the film's nomination, both with dubious merits:

First, Carpetbagger brough to light the anonymous petition demanding that the Academy withdraw the film's nomination because "glorifies" terrorism. (It most certainly does not.) On a separate front, the state of Israel and U.S. Jewish groups have made a formal request to the Academy to change the name of "Palestine" during their March 5th broadcast to "Palestinian Authority"...because, of course, if Hollywood even says the word 'Palestine', Israel will melt into a pool of butterscotch Jell-O.

The real issue here is that in a globalized world it's becoming increasingly difficult to tease out the provenance of anything. We've long sought to compartmentalize projects and products (see Olympic games...) but the fact of the matter is, borders are a fabrication -- and perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in cinema. Just take a look at the nations, municipalities, production companies and ethnic diversity represented by any film with a modest budget. This is about the symbolic recognition of a nation of Palestine, pure and simple.

For Israeli officials and Jewish groups to claim that because there's no formal nation, they couldn't possibly have a cinema is disingenuous. It's as though I annexed your house and claimed that because I'd taken it, the Better Homes and Gardens cover story is about my house. It's a rough analogy but you get the picture.

Gabriel has a nicer take: "This is an example of how Palestinians and Jews can work TOGETHER, instead of blowing their tiny shared square of desert to smithereens over useless prejudices." (ModernFabulousity)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Digg!

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.


Oh No! The Dictionary Has a Liberal Bias!
Is nothing sacred?
Post by Roy Edroso. July 5, 2009.
Amid 2012 Hopefuls' Career Implosions, Future Looks Bleak for GOP
Where are they going from here?
Post by Booman. July 5, 2009.
Yes Men Say No to Jerusalem Film Festival
The famous political pranksters withdraw latest flick in support of divestment movement.
Post by Staff. July 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
gramps
Posted by: gramps on Feb 14, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those covering the lobbying scandals do not mention the fact that foreign governments lobby our government. This is probably the reason that Democrats are haveing such a hard time protesting the war and impeaching Bush. AIPAC the Israeli lobby is the second most powerful lobby after AARP the senior citizen lobby. Speakers at AIPAC meetings have included Hillary and Bill Clinton, Tom Daschle, Nancy Pelosi, as well as Bush, Cheney, and Wolfowitz.

Both Democrats and Republicans are issuing bills for lobbying reform. I suggest that they prohibit any lobbying by any foreign government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Must Read
Posted by: lutherjensen on Feb 14, 2006 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gotta See This:
A Birdshot Pellet Has Migrated to The Heart of The Man Shot by Dick Cheney

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184846,00.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Occupied Territorians?
Posted by: rawlaw on Feb 15, 2006 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palestine was there before the Zionist movement even existed. Perhaps they should be referred to as Occupied Territorians now so that everyone will remember that they are an oppressed and occupied people suffering under a form of Apartheid. I hope the film wins an Oscar. namaste ~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No desert
Posted by: shadiahm on Feb 15, 2006 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right, so Hamas has to recognize Israel's right to exist but Israel doesn't have to recognize Palestine's right to exist? Not even for an Oscar?

And a small correction -- Israel/Palestine is not desert. Well, part of it is but then, so is part of my home state of Oregon. Israel/Palestine has rich farmland (that was there before European Zionists made it "bloom") and lots of forests. It even snows there in the winter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]