Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush spying on CNN?

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 10:11 AM on January 5, 2006.


An altered NBC transcript...
180px-phone_handset
telephone

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

While interviewing James Risen on the Bush spying scandal (read Jan Frel's excellent summary of Risen's revelations here), NBC's Andrea Mitchell asked whether the Bush administration wasn't spying on CNN's Christiane Amanpour.

As John Aravosis points out, you don't ask a question that specific without believing you know something. It'd be like asking: "say, do you know if there's a recall on the '03 Cadillac Escalade's rear axle?" It's fishy. (Note: Escalade drivers [and GM legal team] fear not, this example was plucked from thin air).

Afterward, however, the NBC transcript was released without this question. But it did come with the explanation that "...It was a topic on which we had not completed our reporting..."

Aravosis reads into it: "NBC did not say it pulled the references to Bush spying on Amanpour because it was inappropriate conjecture about something which Andrea Mitchell had no evidence... No, NBC said it pulled the references because it was still investigating the accusation and didn't want to scoop itself before it was finished investigating. And make no mistake, NBC is 'continuing their inquiry.'"

Aravosis also notes that the transcript retained the question of whether Bush may have been spying on reporters, indicating that they didn't feel that this was idle conjecture...

For those who aren't convinced of how frightening this is and why this sort of thing becomes exceptionally complicated, feeding political ambitions, Aravosis goes into Amanpour's connections here (her husband was a Clinton official with many ties to the Democratic party and they most likely shared a phone, computer or some other communication device that may have offered listeners a line into private Democratic communications...). (Americablog)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Digg!

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.


Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch
They're all inter-related, you know.
Post by General JC Christian. July 9, 2009.
After Casting Sole No Vote on Slavery Memorial, Rep. King Keeps Digging Deeper
This is one contorted excuse.
Post by Steve Benen. July 9, 2009.
Airing of Grievances: Right-Winger Incensed over 'Commie's' Jab at 'Saturday Night Fever'
Oh, and Pinochet was a good guy, damnit!
Post by Roy Edroso. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It won't...
Posted by: NamVeT on Jan 5, 2006 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
be long now. King georgie halibush & company will soon be declaring martial law for our "protection" in these dangerous times of terror. Some homegrown "terrorist incident" is just around the corner, so gather yourselves and head for the fucking hills!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It won't... Posted by: diamondvajra
» RE: It won't... Posted by: Pepper
» RE: It won't... Posted by: kww355
rover
Posted by: Roverton on Jan 5, 2006 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm hoping that executive orders are now being disobeyed to avoid later war crime charges. Some must recognise the pattern and become ACTUAL patriots again.

History has those rare examples as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FWIW...
Posted by: trampoline on Jan 5, 2006 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I can think of plenty of reasons why Escalade drivers should fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FWIW... Posted by: Pepper
CNN must have links to "terra"!
Posted by: Mein Bush on Jan 5, 2006 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least in this instance Bush has shown some restraint. As yet, nothing has surfaced to suggest he wanted to bomb CNN!

How can anyone not like him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The gift that keeps giving
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jan 6, 2006 3:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone seriously believe that, given what we know now, the Bush administration didn't spy on the democrats in 2004. What evidence do I have? (other than the case of Chrisiane Amanour?) Not much; An educated guess. When you run into someone in a dark alley who is holding a smoking gun and has a desperate look on his face, there really isn't any tangible accusation to make. But you know in your heart of hearts that he's done something REALLY BAD!

This entire administration should be removed from power and that includes the president, the vice-president, the secretary of state (where did they find that Uncle Tom bitch?) and everyone who has signed on to the immoral, illegal policies of the neo-con agenda. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should be handed over to the Hague and put on trial for war crimes. As I write this, it has just been announced that nine soldiers were killed in Iraq yesterday, 5 January.

Oh sure, you might say, Tom Degan is a left-wing looney, drinking some kind of ideological Kool-Aid. Let me set you straight: I've always considered myself a slightly left-of-center moderate. In years past, although I tended to vote democratic, I was very cabable of voting republican. Where I come from in Orange County, New York, we used to have a very capable and much-loved representitive in congress by the name of Ben Gilman. He was our congressman for over twenty five years untill his district was gerrymandered out of existence by George W. Bush and George Pataki (who really believes he is going to be our next president - How pathetic is that?) Poor old Ben realized the hopelessness of his situation and declined to seek re-election. His crime? He wasn't extreme enough for the Georges. Pity. He was as fine a congressman as they come.

To any republican who may be reading this: Your party is the party of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, inarguably our greatest presidents - only a fool would argue with that statement. But forty two years ago, in the summer of 1964 at the republican national convention in the Cow Palace Arena in San Fransisco (of all places) your party was hijacked by a cabal of kooks, criminals and fools. And all these decades later, they (or their ideological heirs) still retain tight control of the GOP. Take your party back because it's worth saving if only for the legacies of Abe and Teddy, if nothing else.

Pray for peace

Tom Degan
Goshen. NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I must revise Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: The gift that keeps giving Posted by: Stonecutter
» RE: The gift that keeps giving Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: The gift that keeps giving Posted by: goldennugget
» RE: The gift that keeps giving Posted by: Lincoln fan
I do solemnly swear...
Posted by: Germanicus on Jan 6, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that Tom Degan does not drink Kool-Aid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I do solemnly swear... Posted by: Tom Degan
Kool-aid might help a bit
Posted by: xenacat on Jan 6, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially if it has a stiff shot of bourbon in it. We have a certifiable madman in control of our nation who is now spying on our own people with no fear of consequences. He is a criminal and so are the lunatics he has surrounded himself with. Perhaps the news that Dubya is spying on Christiane Amanpour will jolt people out of thier apathy and move them towards demanding impeachment- the whole corrupt crew in D.C should be held accountable for thier criminal acts against both our nation and the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now We Understand about the Torture
Posted by: cellis56 on Jan 6, 2006 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Naomi Klein makes clear in a recent special issue of The Nation, torture is as American as apple pie. The difference between Bush and his buddies using it and previous administrations is that the current crop crows about it. Why? Doesn't make much sense unless you put it together with this gang's obsession with silencing dissent.

Get it? What goes around comes around. And if you think it might be coming for you, you just might be a little less obstreperous in your objections.

We have indeed fallen under the ancient Chinese curse. We live in very interesting times, indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course he's spying on everyone.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 6, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why King George didn't go to the FISA court for approval, which had only turned down something like 15 out of 11,000 requests. The chances are, he's probably spying on damn near everyone who he thinks is "again' 'im" – that would be just about 200 million Americans. Big file.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Of course he's spying on everyone" pt. II
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 6, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't kid yourself: Pentagon/CIA 'Keyhole' satellites can look down on America just a easily as they can foreign countries, and they can resolve images small enough to get nice 8 X 10 glossies of someone getting a b.j. in his backyard. You don't think the administration is using them on us any time that something fires its paranoia hair-trigger? Guess again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NSA Denies Spying on Amanpour
Posted by: Barry Stock on Jan 6, 2006 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/06/nsa.amanpour/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]