Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why IS Judith Miller in jail?

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 5:03 AM on July 14, 2005.


The evidence suggests that maintaining a source's anonymity is not Miller's strong suit.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Among the many remaining questions in the Rove/Plame/Wilson/Miller/Cooper/Bush...scandal is why exactly Judith Miller went to the pokey. Conventional wisdom states that she didn't want to give up her source, but, as Digby points out, she hasn't had trouble in the past:

"One of the things missed in all the paeans to Judy's martyrdom to the confidential source is that the Jeanne D'arc of the Gray Lady had been known to burn her sources without a second thought if it suits her. Seems Judy has some shifting standards when it comes to betraying the reporter's privilege:

In April, Miller interviewed an expert from the Henry L. Stimson Center in Washington on background, then made up a quote and attributed it to the person, who she then named.

In fairness, it may be that this confidential source didn't explicitly say she wanted to be on 'super-double-secret-deep' backround...And, after all, this source was questioning the evidence for WMD and Judy couldn't really sanction that. Indeed, one might even wonder if she burned this source on purpose.

So, before we get all gooey about Judy's great sacrifice in fighting for the reporter's privilege, maybe we need to ask whether or not she believes in it in the first place. The evidence suggests that she doesn't.

So why is she in jail?" (Hullabaloo)

Digg!

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Roving Justice
Posted by: nymike on Jul 14, 2005 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many have been perplexed by the recent turns in Joe Fitzgerald's investigation into who leaked Valerie Plame-Wilson's identity. It seemed particularly inapposite that a NYTimes journalist, Judith Miller, was thrown into jail although she hadn't written anything about Valerie Wilson while Robert Novak, who had, was free as a popinjay. Many agreed with the claim of the NYtimes that Miller is a free-speech martyr. I was one of the many who agreed. However I now believe the matter is not so simple.
What changed is I've learned some of Miller's history. She may not have written about Valerie Wilson, but she intended to. Miller's role in this case can't be understood without recalling her role in the buildup to the Iraq war. She provdided much of the respected journalistic justification for the war. She wrote many articles which claimed that Saddam had WMD. Her role as advocate for the White House's position in fact went far deeper even than this. She acted as a sort of middlewoman between the Army and Ahmed Chalabai in Iraq. She was present when Saddam's son-in-law was arrested and even sat in on his debriefing. In fact this was even called "Judith Miller's team."
Once all this is understood Miller's role and the reason she has been targeted become's much easier to understand. Joseph Wilson's op-ed article in the NYTimes, her very own paper, threatened her as much as it did the White House. In fact Novak's piece beat her to the punch. What is interesting is that I haven't seen anyone in the press really conncecting these dots. The Times just calls her a martyr without recalling her previous role as the premier Iraqi War cheerleader. Keep in mind that Times wrote an op-ed in 2004, without naming Miller, which apologized for its credulousness in advocating the Iraq war. When it is asked why Miller has been targeted as she never did actually write on Valerie Wilson everyone shrugs. They never mention that she intended to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]