Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Zombie Lies Don't Die ... WSJ Spins Discredited Claim that Programs for the Poor Caused Housing Crisis

Posted by Staff, Media Matters for America at 2:03 PM on November 14, 2009.


The idea that affordable housing initiatives were responsible for the crash is a widely discredited myth.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

A November 13 Wall Street Journal op-ed claimed that loans made "under the pressure of" the Community Reinvestment Act helped to "fuel the greatest housing bubble our nation has ever seen." The claim that affordable housing initiatives were responsible for the housing crisis is a widely discredited myth.

From Edward Pinto's Wall Street Journal op-ed:

Congress's goal was to force these two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) to purchase loans that had been originated by banks -- loans that were made under the pressure of another federal law, the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), to increase lending in low- and moderate-income communities.

From 1977 to 1991, $9 billion in local CRA lending commitments had been announced. CRA lending by large banks increased dramatically after the affordable housing mandate was in place in 1993, growing to $6 trillion today. As Ellen Seidman, director of the federal Office of Thrift Supervision, said in a speech before the Greenlining Institute on Oct. 2, 2001, "Our record home ownership rate [increasing from 64.2% in 1994 to 68% in 2001], I'm convinced, would not have been reached without CRA and its close relative, the Fannie/Freddie requirements."

The 1992 GSE Act was the fuse, and the trillions of dollars in subsequent CRA and GSE affordable-housing loans would fuel the greatest housing bubble our nation has ever seen. But who lit the fuse?

[...]

Fifty percent of the high-risk loans are estimated to be CRA loans, with much of the remainder useful to the GSEs in meeting their affordable-housing goals.

The flood of CRA and affordable-housing loans with loosened underwriting standards, combined with declining mortgage interest rates-to 5% in 2003 from 10% in early 1991-resulted in a massive increase in borrowing capacity and fueled a house price bubble of unprecedented magnitude over the period 1997-2006.

Now this history may repeat itself as many of the same community groups are pushing Congress to expand CRA to cover all mortgage lenders, credit unions, insurance companies and others financial industry segments. Are we about to set the stage for another catastrophe? [The Wall Street Journal, 11/13/09]

Myth that CRA and affordable housing initiatives caused crisis has been widely discredited

Bernanke: Experience "runs counter to the charge that CRA was at the root of, or otherwise contributed in any substantive way to, the current mortgage difficulties." In a November 25, 2008, letter, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke stated: "Our own experience with CRA over more than 30 years and recent analysis of available data, including data on subprime loan performance, runs counter to the charge that CRA was at the root of, or otherwise contributed in any substantive way to, the current mortgage difficulties."

SF Reserve Bank's Yellen: "[S]tudies have shown that the CRA has increased the volume of responsible lending to low- and moderate-income households." Janet Yellen, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, stated in a March 2008 speech that "studies have shown that the CRA has increased the volume of responsible lending to low- and moderate-income households."

Digg!

Tagged as: housing bubble, wall street journal, mortgage crisis, cra


Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
We Can Fix a Broken Immigration System... Here's How
Outside pressure is the key to finally winning this fight.
Post by Rachel LaBruyere. November 20, 2009.
Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
Post by Steve Benen. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
once the conservatives establish their talking points
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 14, 2009 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it is hard to get their myths to die. The conservative on Diane Rehm week in review on Friday repeated this conservative chestnut of received wisdom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course, silly. It was the silly bankers who bet that folks in falling down houses...
Posted by: franklyspanking on Nov 14, 2009 9:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...without jobs, or without sufficient income could:

a) afford a 60-150k committment

b) were good bets on slicing and dicing (derivative) instruments

If only yon governmentals had stayed out of it, folks without the wherewithal to afford a house would be in affordable rentals, and dumb bankers would be out of business.

Enter the Bush/Obama model: invade them!

Save the dumb bankers! Finance folks who can't afford a house yet by tapping their neighbor's earnings, and their childrens!

So it goes...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Blame I didn't Inhale 'Or sleep with her'
Posted by: Richardsievert on Nov 15, 2009 5:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporation idiots that sent the people's jobs away outsourcing there pay' Most of the people went with there faceless companies then influencing "A mussel from Mexico' To fill a need you people blame everyone but the source' Yes the poor where affected rightly because bill Clinton let his wanton buddies and fat bureaucrat rat snakes to do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Take a breath... Posted by: Finnegansawake
The altnerative is to admit the free market doesn't work
Posted by: jebpgh on Nov 15, 2009 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Suppose it is true - that CRA pressure "forced" bad loans (which it is not) the reality is had banks and the wholesale lenders of Fannie and Freddie contained these loans within their own balance sheets the crisis would have only been a problem. What caused the crisis was the financial markets desire to wheel and deal with exotic derivatives across a global financial system. It is the wholesale collapse of the credit system that drove us to the brink of complete and total meltdown - and that was all on the free market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Nice, AlterNet.
Posted by: Longdream on Nov 15, 2009 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, one more time.

Gosh! G. Gordon Liddy? Do you think it's really productive to focus on the remarks of someone like G. Gordon Liddy? After all, he isn't exactly on the A-list of the people who feed untrue ideas to folks who maybe don't know any better because, as you know, people tend to focus on news outlets inside their comfort level.

If you're giving G. Gordon Liddy a place on the forum, I half expect that next we'll see some lesser star in the fringe firmament--say Chuck Colson, maybe.

Was this statement better, and more to your liking? Because it bored me senseless to write it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: *SNORT* Posted by: Longdream
You're right it wasn't affordable housing initiatives
Posted by: Raytan on Nov 16, 2009 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was the Federal Reserve that did it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Greed and lies are what brought the housing market down.
Posted by: donnal on Nov 19, 2009 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greed from homeowners to flip a house. Greed from mortgage brokers, banks, and real estate agents to make another deal. Greed from homeowers who took out 130% value home loans out on their homes. Greed from banks who let them do this. Greed from groups like ACORN who forced (yes forced) banks to either pay the group or loan money to individuals who could not pay the mortgage, who then package the deals with other mortgages and sold these to investors, who from their greed wanted a higner return. Greed from our government leaders who allowed Fanny and Freddie to operate and lose so much money. Many hands helped this housing market fall.

Lies that everyone should own a home. Lies that every person who took a loan out in the last ten years did not have to provide proof of employement and earnings. Lies from mortgage compaines who sold mortgages for no down, low interest and a huge balloon payment in 3,5 or 7 years. Lies that they would be out of the house, flip it and buy a bigger house. Lies that our spending was helping the country. Lies that jobs would not be shipped over sea. Lies that we are all entitled to the American dream and whatever makes us happy. Lies to ourselves that all of this mess is not our own fault.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]