Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Right Swoons Over Bush's Widely Publicized "Unpublicized" Visit to Fort Hood

Posted by Steve M., No More Mister Nice Blog at 1:04 PM on November 12, 2009.


Now how did that get out to ... Fox News so quickly?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

There's some buzz in the right-wing blogosphere in response to this post on a PUMA blog (yes, PUMA blogs are still around) and this one by Jerusalem Post columnist and editor Caroline Glick, both praising George W. Bush for his "unpublicized" trip last week to see wounded Fort Hood soldiers.

An excerpt from Glick's post:

Missing George W. Bush

A couple of days ago I heard the news that George and Laura Bush paid a private visit to the wounded soldiers at Fort Hood. They specifically requested that the base commander not inform the media of their visit. They came. They comforted the wounded soldiers and the Fort Hood community for a couple of hours. And then they left. And they never had their pictures taken saluting the troops or holding their hands.

When I heard the news, I felt this pain that hasn't gone away. It's a pain that I have been feeling fairly often since last November....

When I heard the news, I was struck by the fact that I heard the news. Isn't it odd how fast word of this "private" visit got around -- on Fox News the next morning, and ultimately all over the media? Darn that base commander, or whoever it was, who informed the press of the visit even though Bush specifically requested that it not be publicized!

A cynic, of course, would say that there's an effort in Bushworld to sell him as a guy who not only visits troops but shuns any publicity for those visits -- and what do you know, there was a story publicizing Bush's aversion to publicity in the Bush-friendly Washington Times last December, just about when Bushies were devoting considerable energy to making the case in the media for his "legacy":

EXCLUSIVE: Bush, Cheney comforted troops privately

For much of the past seven years, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have waged a clandestine operation inside the White House. It has involved thousands of military personnel, private presidential letters and meetings that were kept off their public calendars or sometimes left the news media in the dark.

Their mission: to comfort the families of soldiers who died fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and to lift the spirits of those wounded in the service of their country....


And somehow the secret, little-known, hush-hush, on-the-QT visits by Bush have been a frequent point of pride cited by online supporters since sometime in his first term. 2003:

Bush to visit wounded troops (Again)
I thought it would be nice to point this out, as many democrats try to claim that Bush "doesn't visit the wounded", when in reality he just doesn't use it as political fodder (translation: Bush doesn't mass publicize it)....

2004:

There are good reasons for not going to the funerals. And the President often visits the families of the dead, and also often visits wounded soldiers. (And doesn't exploit this for publicity.)

And, more recently:

I know guys who were at Walter Reed who had Bush, Rumsfeld, and others pay them visits. They were never publicized. Any photos that were taken were given to the soldiers; not put on the front page of the Washington Post by the White House.

But I'm sure I'm being cynical to think this is a meme deliberately circulated on the right to spread the notion of Bush's virtue. And I'm sure I'm being cynical to imagine that Glick and the PUMA bloggers are part of that process.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, obama, fort hood

Steve M. is the proprietor of No More Mister Nice Blog.


Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
We Can Fix a Broken Immigration System... Here's How
Outside pressure is the key to finally winning this fight.
Post by Rachel LaBruyere. November 20, 2009.
Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
Post by Steve Benen. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Who?
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 12, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is George W Bush? That is not a name I am familiar with.

Oh, wait. Memory returning.... A slight recollection...

Oh, yes. Wasn't he an asshole?

Gag. Feeling nauseous now....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've just suffered a whole new experience
Posted by: moloko velocet on Nov 12, 2009 1:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....in uncontrolable, autonomic, projectile vomiting!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has he visited any of the homeless under bridges yet?
Posted by: fcvoigt on Nov 12, 2009 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or those in jail for rage crimes, drug abuse charges etc. following the nightmares he put them through?

Has he visited any of the wives battered by the primary victims of his thug-training programme?

Or any of the kids who no longer have a civil, domesticated father?

Is he supporting any of the mothers who have come back traumatised?

Or the female troops so hideously abused while serving his purposes?

We know the answer.

Discretion here or secrecy there - if he had done even ONE constructive or sympathetic thing, Faux 'news' would have made him a saint already and there would be not even a pretence of secrecy about it.

Which is not to say I wouldn't welcome it if President Obama considered taking any or all of those steps, and he is very welcome to bring all the troops and the money-grabbers home ASAP meaning before Christmas 2010.

Split the money you save, use half to rebuild the jobs programme in the USA and the other half to restore basic essentials to the territories ravaged by Bush's greed.

And make Cheney and all who love him 'survive' on their present level of ill-gotten gains. Not one penny more in their greedy little maws.

I doubt any of them would suffer a fraction of the financial hardships they take for granted their victims should thrive on.

Visit couragetoresist.org if you are interested in learning more about the agony vets are suffering and which contributes to escalations like the one in Fort Hood.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good on ya, Dubya!
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Nov 12, 2009 4:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
your next visit should be an unannounced visit to the Hague...or better yet, a firing squad.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I Like that Posted by: moloko velocet
» RE: Good on ya, Dubya! Posted by: bettyn
Oh, good...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 12, 2009 5:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that means they didn't bother with photo ops this time when Bush served them plastic turkey.

Even if this were not a stunt... far too little, far too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Words fail me.
Posted by: Longdream on Nov 12, 2009 5:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too bad these satanic motherfuckers couldn't get it up to go to a military funeral while they were in office, or acknowledge the wounded and disabled from Iraq and Afghanistan except to dock their pay with imaginary debts for the EQUIPMENT they failed to account for after they were shot up. Too bad they couldn't think of any comfort except to mark them AWOL (and dock their pay some more) while they were right underfoot enjoying substandard medical care at Walter Reed, or NO medical care while smothered in red tape at home. Too bad they couldn't think of any way to express the high esteem in which they held America's fighting men and women than to exploit them as torturers.

Oh, that former Commander-in-Chief and his henchmen, they just LOVE themselves some goddamned soldiers. Those heinous bottom-feeders. They make me want to puke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where does the autopen signing condolences fit into the "man of compassion" picture?
Posted by: Paul_C on Nov 12, 2009 8:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny, didn't the right wing just end a campaign against Justice Sotomayer premised on their disgust with her application of that evil concept known as "compassion"?

Was it not their contention that compassion is a sign of weakness reserved for loser liberals and street people?

Isn't that what Bush/Cheney/Rummie and friends truly thought of soldiers sent off to war - that they are losers from the dreaded underclass whose lot in life is to slave and die for the winners in life, themselves? Isn't that part of the grand scheme of things, why the top 1 percent hold 95 percent of the wealth - so the masses of poor beg to die in Iraq or Afghanistan so the big boys can get their sweaty hands on all that oil?

Isn't that why Rummie smirked his little smirk as he dismissed the lack of armor for the little people fighting his war, impatiently sneering that "You go to war with the army you've got". Never mind that no one was pushing for new armor until it hit the evening news.

And who can forget Rummie's own secret weapon against the dreaded compassion - the autopen! Combined with photo blackouts of returning coffins and silence on civilian and contractor death counts, the Master's of the Master Country were keeping their distance from sniveling compassion.

And then there was the man his'self, Bush, strutting like a game cock with his arms slightly raised at his sides like he was just looking for an excuse to kick someone's ass.

Never mind that he looked an awful lot like Alfred E. Newmann - if anyone says anything about it the Secret Service really will kick your ass and put you on a plane for Syria!

Now there's some compassion for ya' sucka'! HaHaHaHa!

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nike punk STFU
Posted by: zipper696 on Nov 13, 2009 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you are reported, scumbag.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reporting this crap...
Posted by: zipper696 on Nov 13, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..is a major job.
The damn "code letters" you have to fill in won't accept on the first go around - please Alternets guys can you check what's wrong with the reporting page - it's driving me crazy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You got one deleted. Posted by: Longdream
A wide circle....
Posted by: Emmories on Nov 13, 2009 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this the former president that only circled the area of Katrina? Is this the same one that spent 487 days at Camp David and 490 in Texas...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrisy and Delusion...
Posted by: djnoll on Nov 13, 2009 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
know no bounds! This man should be under arrest and sitting at GITMO, not visiting the troops at Ft. Hood like a sitting president. Do these idiots who are singing Bush's praises not realize that he was visiting victims of a shooting incident, not a war, as a private citizen, and that unless it was a photo-op for him he never visited the victims he sent into harm's way?

He is a joke and a very dangerous one at that, because he gives idiots on the right-wing train to lala land a conductor. This was a well-planned non-event that was designed merely to shore up the GOP agenda of undercutting the President. Bush IS NOT THE PRESIDENT - AND HE SHOULD STOP ACTING LIKE HE IS! He only gives fodder to those who would destroy this nation from within.

President Obama did the same thing, visited the troops without cameras because that is the current regulation on military bases for wounded personnel. Bush was subjected to the same restrictions as Obama when Obama visited the wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan during the campaign (not victims of an on-base shooting incident) - remember when FOX called him an "opportunistic politician who did not care for the soldiers" and said he had not really visited them. Maybe the MSM could say that about Bush - it would certainly be more believable about Bush, who would not see the caskets or go to the funerals of the thousands of soldiers he sent to die for his own profit, than it is about Obama.

But in a corporate, war-mongering America, these right-wing idiots give praise where none is due, and withhold it when it is earned. My heart goes out to the soldiers and their families at Fort Hood for what has happened there. It is a shame that the former President felt he had to use it as an excuse to polish his hypocritical image!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]