Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Woops! Bill O'Reilly Doesn't Remember What the Public Option Is Called, or That It's Pretty Popular (Video)

Posted by Ben Armbruster, Think Progress at 12:14 PM on November 10, 2009.


Big Bill was shut down unexpectedly last night by fellow Fox Newser Brit Hume. Go figure.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

Last night on Fox News, host Bill O’Reilly and analyst Brit Hume discussed the prospects for the Senate passing a health care reform bill. After struggling with the terminology for the “public option,” O’Reilly ultimately concluded that “all the polls say” that “the folks don’t want it.”

Hume, a regular Fox News misinformer, surprisingly corrected O’Reilly, noting that Americans actually support the public option:

O’REILLY: They call it, you know, the public sector. What is the –

HUME: Public option, you mean?

O’REILLY: Public option, whatever. The folks don’t want it. … But it looks to me like they have maybe 55 votes to pass it. And that means they could be filibustered and never come up for a vote.

HUME: That’s what it looks like right now. The public option, actually some polls show that the public option standing by itself is not at all unpopular, but it is kind of popular. But that depends on how the poll question is raised. … We don’t need to go into all that right now.

Watch it:

Those trying to derail reform with a public option try to claim that Americans don’t support it. “All the polls now indicate substantial opposition to this particular type of health care reform,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said last night on Fox. But Hume is right. Americans do support the public option, as recent polling shows:

CNN/Opinion Research, Oct. 30 – Nov. 1: 55 percent support “creating a public health insurance option administered by the federal government that would compete with plans offered by private health insurance companies.”

Ipsos/McClatchy, Oct. 30 – Nov. 1: 51 percent support the “creation of a public entity to directly compete with existing health insurance companies.”

Other recent polls, such as USA Today/Gallup and Washington Post/ABC News, have found majority support for the public option — results that are consistent with other polling on this question throughout the health care debate this year.

Indeed, large majorities in Connecticut support the public option but Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), the state’s junior independent senator, has repeatedly said he will filibuster any bill that contains a public option. Like Hume, Lieberman doesn’t want to talk about polling support for the public option either, reportedly saying that poll respondents are simply “confused.”

Digg!

Tagged as: fox, o'reilly, fox news, public option

Benjamin J. Armbruster is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Hard-liners Peddle Zombie Lies About Immigrants and Crime
A new report flies in the face of 100 years of data showing immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes than the native-born.
Post by Walter Ewing. November 22, 2009.
Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
It's FOX Noise -
Posted by: leland61 on Nov 11, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you expect - fair and balanced? Rational? Fact Based?

GET REAL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh yes
Posted by: paulaH on Nov 11, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We poor unwashed masses have so little education and, honestly, we don't really have ways to find out what is really going on and what the public option means, so we're just confused about the question of "do you want insurance companies to have competition to drive down their prices and do you want a chance to have health care that you don't have now?" We poor dears just don't know what's good for us so these wonderful Republican--like Lieberman--Congressmen must make our decision for us. We just can't make our own decisions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lieberman has already decided
Posted by: Archie1954 on Nov 11, 2009 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that he serves the insurance companies rather than his constituents in Connecticut. It really is up the the voters in that state to set him straight on where his loyalties should lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Windbag O'Reilly
Posted by: Doubtom43 on Nov 11, 2009 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when did this windbag ever require accuracy or truth to intrude into his blustering bullshit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's confused?
Posted by: jimmyaj on Nov 11, 2009 12:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the public were any less confused, support for a single payer public option would be even greater.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Back to square one
Posted by: willymack on Nov 11, 2009 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Might just as well call this a dead loss and begin anew.
This time we need to demand an up and down vote both in the House and Senate for HR676, with NO amendments.
No bullshit about why this can't be done; you elected officials work for US, remember?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shakespeare Was Wrong...
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair on Nov 11, 2009 6:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers".

- Henry VI, part 2, Act IV, Scene ii.

If he was writing today, he'd have a much longer list. I can't decide if the lobbyists, the politicians or the CEOs should be first. Any ideas?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Kill all the lawyers"
Posted by: clarence on Nov 15, 2009 10:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rule of thumb: All lawyers are lying sacks of shit. Except for the one who's representing me.
Another rule of thumb: A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client.
In a system as broken as ours, unfortunately, we NEED lawyers to defend us, both in criminal cases and against corporations.

I need to get off the internet and read me some Shakespeare, but I believe the context of the quote in question was the steps one would need to establish totalitarian rule. Step one: Kill all the lawyers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]