Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA

Posted by Ari Berman, The Nation at 6:00 AM on November 9, 2009.


It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

There's a very important editorial in The Nation this week that I hope everyone will take the time to read. It's about the wrongful conviction of Anthony McKinney, who's been in prison for thirty-one years for a murder he did not commit. I'm posting the relevant portions below. 

On the evening of September 15, 1978, a white security guard named Donald Lundahl was murdered in a robbery gone awry in a racially fraught southern suburb of Chicago. Police fingered Anthony McKinney, an 18-year-old African-American with no criminal record, as the killer. The prosecution sought death by lethal injection; the judge sentenced McKinney to life in prison.

McKinney has long maintained his innocence. Based on newly uncovered evidence, there's strong reason to believe that he has spent thirty-one years in prison for a crime he did not commit.

...In 2000 the Land of Lincoln's Republican governor, George Ryan, issued a moratorium on the death penalty, and in 2003 he granted clemency to all death-row inmates. Ryan announced his decision at Northwestern University, citing the work of Northwestern journalism professor David Protess and his students at the Medill School of Journalism, who had uncovered evidence that helped free five wrongly convicted men from death row.

In 2003 Protess and his students began examining McKinney's case. Over three years of painstaking reporting, they unearthed startling new evidence: the prosecution's two main witnesses, 15 and 18 at the time of the trial, recanted their testimony during interviews with the students, claiming they were beaten by the police and intimidated into doctoring the facts; McKinney alleged that he was beaten with a pipe by a detective with a history of police brutality before signing a sham confession; TV logs proved that both witnesses were watching a boxing match at the time of the shooting and thus could not have seen the murder; an ex-gang member, Anthony Drake, confessed on tape to being at the murder scene, named two perpetrators and said McKinney was not involved; current and former residents of the neighborhood confirmed they heard Drake and two other suspects confess to Lundahl's murder.

In 2006 the Medill Innocence Project turned over its findings to the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern's law school. The center shared the evidence with the Cook County State's Attorney's Office, which began an internal investigation the following year. After more than a year of delay by the state, the center filed a postconviction petition on behalf of McKinney in October 2008, calling for a new trial or his immediate release. Following her election that November as Cook County State's Attorney, hardline career prosecutor Anita Alvarez fought the discovery of new evidence, and in May she issued a sweeping, unprecedented subpoena ordering Protess to hand over all material related to the McKinney case--including students' private memos and grades. Alvarez insultingly suggested that students might receive better grades for uncovering exculpatory evidence and claimed that Protess and his students were "investigators," not journalists, and thus not subject to the Illinois shield law...Apparently Alvarez has never heard of investigative journalism.

...The state's subpoena, wielded to stall justice and intimidate those who seek it, sets a terrible precedent. Lawyer Barry Scheck says that in his seventeen years at the Innocence Project in New York, he's never seen a subpoena of this nature directed at journalists or lawyers. Concludes Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law expert at George Washington University, "It creates an enormous chilling effect that's positively glacial."

Judge Cannon will soon rule on the validity of the state's subpoena. We urge her to throw it out and order a prompt evidentiary hearing. The kind of difficult reporting undertaken by the Medill Innocence Project should be celebrated, not undermined. It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.

Nine groups of student journalists from Medill have interviewed McKinney in prison. By their accounts, he's a fragile and gentle man who's battled severe depression during three decades of wrongful incarceration. "If the state had gotten its way," Protess notes, "he would have been executed long ago."

I was one of those students. I took Protess's class in the spring of 2004 and worked on McKinney's case. The experience became the highlight of my time at Medill. My team and I were just twenty-one and twenty-two at the time, thrust into unfamiliar environs on the South Side of Chicago and elsewhere, trying to ferret out the facts of a murder that occurred before any of us were born. David's class, more than any other, taught me how to be a reporter, how to make make difficult decisions in a quick and decisive manner and how to always strive for justice and empathy in my work. (CNN anchor and McKinney alum Nicole Lapin has also posted a great piece about her own experiences.)

Find out the truth, David told us. That was his only mandate. Our work on the McKinney case strongly convinced me of his innocence. The facts were startling and overwhelming. We hoped that after the Center on Wrongful Convictions shared our evidence with the Cook County State's Attorney's office, the state would see things from our vantage point, treat the facts with respect and come to a serious conclusion about McKinney's innocence, granting him a new trial or full release. That hasn't happened. Instead, the state has stalled its own investigation and hit Protess and his students with an unprecedented subpoena that has far-reaching ramifications.

It's impossible to describe what it's like to work on a wrongful convictions case until you've actually done it. The work eats at you and wrenches at your heart. This case is not over. Justice can still be done. David taught us to believe, perhaps naively, that the truth is powerful enough to set someone free.

Digg!

Tagged as: anthony mckinney, david protess, medill, northwestern


What Sarah Palin's "Jewish people will be flocking to Israel" prediction means
Palin's associated with a religious tendency whose leaders promote anti-Jewish conspiracy theory
Post by Bruce Wilson. November 21, 2009.
Considering a Faux Turkey for the Holidays? Better Read This First
A review of four "birds" -- and it's not pretty.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 21, 2009.
Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Students who exposed 30 year old wrongful conviction targeted?
Posted by: ADNK on Nov 9, 2009 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is this story not coming up?

Has the Chicago DA (alledegdly targeting those students) told Alternet to take it down?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

censorship?
Posted by: Frustrated Farmer on Nov 9, 2009 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has Alternet been hit by censorship from Chicago, that hotbed of liberalism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this a glitch ?
Posted by: Mad Mal on Nov 9, 2009 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or is this story being squelched? It doesn't work to do that, it'll just get put up somewhere else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No surprise about this nasty needle lover.
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 9, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This bitch needs to be REMOVED from office and a HUMAN BEING installed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ABOUT THE 'TRUTH'
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 9, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The professor is right. It will set the man free. But where was truth when the man was wrongfully convicted? That's when it mattered more. The important thing is to get someone convicted, anyone and close the books and consider the crime solved. So the wrong man goes to jail for 30 years and the guy who did it is still on the loose. The bar is set very low on these trials. Flimsy evidence, a less than bright defense attorney, a jury that can't wait to go home amount to nothing more than going through the motions. The legal system in its arrogance refuses to impose standards on themselves. They are the final word but they shouldn't be. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tough on "Crime"
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 9, 2009 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conservatives will not be happy until all INNOCENT people (a group not including the conservatives) are behind bars or have been executed. Meanwhile, Cheney and Bush go free.

Where is the justice!?!?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The DA's office should
Posted by: Archie1954 on Nov 9, 2009 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have only one goal and that is to present the case. It should never win or lose a case. That is not its job. It's job is to find and present the evidence that a judge and jury can then review and come to a fair and just conclusion. Hiding evidence or creating false evidence or doing anything to subvert this process destroys the judicial system. That is what is happening here. The DA's office has to be stopped immediately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The DA's office should Posted by: DaBear
» RE: The DA's office should Posted by: billslm
Freedom, Justice, and the American Way
Posted by: willymack on Nov 9, 2009 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harrumph!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Telling the truth,
Posted by: linecrosser on Nov 9, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and admitting mistakes, is a sign of maturity. This government is run by a bunch of idiotic childlike egotistical maniacs. Term limits for all elected government officials at all levels might help. Politics was never meant to be a life long career. Shooting them would be quicker and send a strong message to those who follow, to do the will of the people, protect the weak from the strong, and follow the constitution. Police the police. Judge the judges. Confiscate the wealth and let the elite sleep under a bridge. Sterilize the "Powers That Be" to remove their DNA from the planet. Sound like a good ideal, when do we start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Telling the truth, Posted by: billslm
The "truth"?! 'Merkuh cannot handle the truth...
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 9, 2009 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David taught us to believe, perhaps naively, that the truth is powerful enough to set someone free.

Naive indeed. In the lower classes, we know better. The truth is irrelevant. Only thing that counts for anything is what the rich boy says. That becomes the law and the verdict.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America....
Posted by: fearn on Nov 9, 2009 6:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the home of the free and the land of the brave.

Remarkably there are actually some Americans who believe this!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America.... Posted by: vkobaya1
» RE: America.... Posted by: linecrosser
It is an ill wind that blows no good and a sick noise that terrorizes.
Posted by: Nitestallion on Nov 10, 2009 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been long known that the nick name for Illinoise is "SICK NOISE" why not qarentine the lot of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do you expect
Posted by: bigbrother on Nov 10, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chicago, Cook County - need I say more - always was and still is the most corrupt place on earth - any political appointee or elected politician that comes out of there seems to be corrupt!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do you expect Posted by: lively56
Prosecutors' jobs are to "get" people, and they're given virtually total immunity from wrongdoing
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Nov 10, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in "getting" them! Prosecutors, U.S. Attorneys, whatever they're title, have far too much power and no accountability! They want to "win" all their cases, and whether the defendant is guilty or innocent doesn't really matter to them!

Moreover, this country has a history of pinning crimes on the nearest black man who may be least able to defend himself!

Lastly, we must get our corrupt gov't out of the death-penalty murder business!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That District Attorney
Posted by: Archie1954 on Nov 10, 2009 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
should be removed from office!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what?
Posted by: Normm on Nov 10, 2009 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Alvarez insultingly suggested that students might receive better grades for uncovering exculpatory evidence ..."

And that makes the evidence false? The true is not dependent on the messenger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not shocking at all
Posted by: greenferret on Nov 10, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you know anything about Cook County government. It's the most unabashedly corrupt machine government in the country. Miscarriage of justice is the norm.
For anyone living in Chicago who wants to end that culture of official impunity: support the Green Party. Stop electing Democrats who are turning your government into a crime family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's not shocking at all Posted by: Richardsievert
Until We Start Convicting Cops For Torturing Witnesses Nothing Changes
Posted by: desidid on Nov 10, 2009 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When my son was murdered I had to do my own investigating. The cops didn't follow through on the evidence I found. In 16 years I have not been able to get the police reports (part of the victim's rights). And a cop told me I would never get them because there aren't any. I was told by the Indiana State's Attorney General 16 years ago that I had no recourse with the cops because they don't have to investigate a murder. Can you believe that, what are they charged with if not investigating crimes? The injustice system in this country exist to enslave people and occassionally get a bad person off the street. But I pity anyone who has to depend on them for justice, especially if you are a poor or a person of color. Justice ain't blind just nearsighted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Somebody's gonna hang for this."
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Nov 10, 2009 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't much matter who, as long as:

A) They are too poor to hire a good lawyer.

B) Minorities are preferable targets.

C) It can make the cops look like they are doing their job without ...uh... all that time consuming investigation. Cops rarely "solve" crimes. If there is enough pressure, they simply manufacture a perpetrator. Otherwise, they wait for a plausible snitch or a confession. (Sometimes - as in the O.J. case - they frame the guy who actually did it.)

D) It gets people elected to higher office.

By the way, once accused by the police of a crime, I'd much rather be guilty as hell - and rich - than completely innocent and poor. We have the best justice system that money can buy. No cash, no justice. And exactly how much time did Limbaugh get again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

darkmark
Posted by: darkmark on Nov 10, 2009 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
having been busted several times i know they just don't care. those in power play the game together. they support each other and that doesn't include us. in this case the they is obvious. of course not all people in power are power hungry pieces of crap. its just that to many are. the politically hungry and power hungry are the ones to watch. if you're poor you have a target on you, front and back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy Way
Posted by: Jeanne on Nov 10, 2009 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that law enforcement always looks for the easy way to close a case. It's all about closing the case, not about solving the crime.

The police decide who's "guilty", then set about to "prove" it. Sometimes it means ignoring, or hiding, evidence that points in another direction. Or, turning a blind eye to the obvious as the case grows colder and colder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sounds like business as usual in chicago...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Nov 10, 2009 10:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and anyone that doesnt think that the DA is getting some kind of kickback from the local prison company.. would buy beach property in idaho...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I found you.....
Posted by: JeffreyG on Nov 11, 2009 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You take the cake.... someone who has no clue what Conservatism means... Maybe you should be behind bars for stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» beautiful, but what does it say? Posted by: tazdelaney
better late than never
Posted by: tazdelaney on Nov 12, 2009 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
at the end of this article, the author says it isn't too late for justice to be done. but how is the state going to give him back 31 years? in most of these situations ther eisn't even a settlement made, though how can money replace a stolen life.

seems to me that al those involved in obstructing of justice and forcing fake 'confessions' are guilty of murdering this man for 31 solid years, eh? so it seems that all of these should be sent to prison for 31 years each.

it should be noted that illinois is one of 11 states which have had prison guards and even wardens charged with torturing prisoners, mostly black ones, of course. some were longterm 'programs' as has become official US policy (obama, mind you, continued CIA's rendition program on his second day in office which told me all i needed to know about him.) one young black was killed in that illinois torture scene and the killers tried to cover it up, saying that he had just choked on some food; but one of them admitted he had been handcuffed to a bed at the time he was being beaten.

i read a couple years ago about an 18 year old kid in oklahoma who was sent to prison for 15 years for giving a 15 year old a blowjob. the recipient of the sexual favor wasn't raped, said it was activity between friends and he refused to testify about it in court but his parents pursued it anyway and the prosecutor and judge bought it. i think that when that poor boy gets out of prison, his first date should be with the judge, a nice long slow visit... then he should go deliver justice to a few others involved in this atrocity. jefferson said, "if the people cannot gain justice in their courts; they must find other means of doing so."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hi
Posted by: somavelina on Nov 13, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a great place------- Cougarmatching.com ------- It's a premiere cougar dating community for older women seeking younger men and young men seeking cougars. Come in, post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the hot photo galleries. You will find someone you like here...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA
Posted by: Hans on Nov 14, 2009 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't Chicago the hometown of Barack Obama? Why not write him and make him aware of a bad situation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]