Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Climate Change: The Grown-Ups Are Back In Charge

Posted by Raquel Brown, The Media Consortium at 5:00 PM on November 6, 2009.


By moving forward without Republicans and a troublesome conservaDem, Boxer puts climate change bill back on track.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Politics in your
mailbox!

 

Senate Democrats in the Environment and Public Works Committee finally squelched Republican boycotts and passed a version of the climate bill Wednesday morning. Last week, Republican senators refused to show up to committee hearings in an attempt to stall the bill. Brian Beutler of Talking Points Memo notes that EPW has now set “the stage for other panels to amend the legislation.”

To no one’s surprise, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., immediately complained about the legislation on Fox News. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., was the lone Democrat that did not vote, which Inhofe interpreted as a sign that the bill is “dead.”

Chairman Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., was much more upbeat and argued that the Republican boycott actually marred their credibility. “The absence of the Republicans during the Environmental Protection Agency’s presentation was a clear message that their criticism of the EPA analysis was not a substantive one,” Boxer said. “We are pleased that despite the Republican boycott, we have been able to move the bill.”

Inhofe also condemned Boxer for passing the bill through the committee unconventionally. Aaron Wiener writes for The Washington Independent that “Without a quorum that included at least two Republicans, the committee was unable to open formal debate on amendments to the bill. But passage requires just a simple majority, and Chairman Boxer and the Democratic leadership chose to forgo amendments in order to move the legislation quickly, given that the end of the GOP boycott was nowhere in sight.”  Luckily, now that the bill is moving on to other committees, Inhofe and his Republican EPW colleagues will no longer have much of a say on the bill’s final outcome.

 

With Copenhagen just a month away, Kate Sheppard argues for Mother Jones that the odds of passing a viable climate bill before the climate summit are very grim. On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will run a series of studies after each committee’s climate and energy bills are combined into a single piece of legislation. Even though the bill passed through the EPW committee, other committees, such as the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Finance Committee, and Agriculture Committee, need to weigh in before the bill is reviewed by the EPA and sent for a vote in the full Senate. How will this affect climate talks in Copenhagen? Sheppard writes that, “Without the urgency imposed by the Copenhagen deadline, any little momentum that the climate bill had could disappear very fast.”

While this news is discouraging, Steve Benen of the Washington Monthly points out that, “It’s worth remembering that it wasn’t too terribly long ago that reports said the same thing about health care reform. Legislative battles can often take some unpredictable twists and turns.” This is certainly true, but in order for the legislation to pass, more Republicans will have to get on board. Democrats are trying to gain Republican support for a bipartisan bill by pledging to meet them halfway.

“For several GOP lawmakers, the key on energy policy is building new nuclear power plants. So, Dems are willing to make a deal — they’ll back approval for expedited construction of U.S. nuclear reactors in exchange for support for the rest of the bill,” Benen writes.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC.) showed that some Republicans are capable of exerting leadership. In a press conference with Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Graham criticized Republicans’ childish behavior toward climate change legislation. He asked, “If you can’t participate in solving the problem, then why are you up here?”

David Roberts writes for Grist that the three senators pledged to work with the White House to rescue the climate bill. The senators’ plan is not meant to undermine Sen. Boxer’s efforts but to strengthen the bill overall through a “dual track.”

“By stepping in, Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman are letting the political establishment know that the Very Serious grown-ups are back in charge. (It’s pretty telling that Kerry feels the need to craft another bill alongside the one with his name on it.) They will go to the White House, close the door, and hash out what kind of bill can really pass,” writes Roberts.

The road ahead won’t be easy. Congress’ inability to pass climate change legislation could ruin any chance of success in Copenhagen. In weeks to come, the bill will move on to other Senate committees and the world will be watching. Stay tuned.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the environment by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. Visit the Mulch for a complete list of articles on environmental issues, or follow us on Twitter. And for the best progressive reporting on critical economy, health care and immigration issues, check out The Audit, The Pulse and The Diaspora. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of leading independent media outlets, of which AlterNet is a member.

Digg!

Tagged as: copenhagen, climate change bill, sen. max baucus, sen. barbara boxer, sen. james inhofe, environment and public wo


Hard-liners Peddle Zombie Lies About Immigrants and Crime
A new report flies in the face of 100 years of data showing immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes than the native-born.
Post by Walter Ewing. November 22, 2009.
Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Inhofe is a nincompoop
Posted by: Thedirtydemocrat on Nov 7, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By pushing for common sense in getting a decent environmental bill passed Inhofe is being left out. The idiot and his crew on the committee missed a chance to do the right thing for the very first time in over 8 years.

We can only hope that clean bill can be passed by the meeting time in Copenhagen, but don't hold yer breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legislation is not the answer
Posted by: lclark on Nov 7, 2009 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China is now the biggest polluter and has no intention of reducing its pollution if it affects thier economic growth.
Rather than more legislation we should build our way out of the problem and create jobs in the process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sounds like
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Nov 7, 2009 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a new catholic religion that's created for consumption by the as usual, gullable masses. We are talking about climate change, those changes that are linked to solar activity and natural earth changes right; not the artificially media manipulated propaganda that spews out global warming horseshit right? Where's the proof? Not Al Gore's proof. Watch Fall of the Republic..

1789

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support a strong climate bill
Posted by: greenferret on Nov 7, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The climate targets currently proposed by Washington are unbearably weak - far behind what the IPCC says would give us a 50:50 chance of avoiding disaster.

Tell President Obama and your senators to support a 40% emissions reduction by 2020 to prevent global crisis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where do the Republicans Plan to Live????
Posted by: Outspokengrandmother on Nov 7, 2009 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exactly where do the Republicans plan to live and -- more important to me -- where are they going to take their kids and grandkids when all Hell breaks loose? Inhof and friends are like my friend Kenny who ignored his doctor's concern about the growing shadow in his bladder until he discovered that he had full blown Cancer. By that time all that remained to him as choices were what pain killers he was going to take until he died... except Inhof and Co. are in charge of making decisions about my life, my kids lives, and the lives of my grandchildren. Get rid of the fools and do it quickly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Arrogance
Posted by: marat on Nov 7, 2009 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
continues. People think they can control the climate; that the changes in climate is caused by little man. It is an ego-centric religious belief with totalitarian overtones of Stalinist control. If people don't believe in global warming they are branded heretics or holocaust deniers. This venom directed at those who won't get with the program shows you the weakness of the science behind global warming and the overbearing nature of liberals who want to ram their ideas down other people's throats so they can somehow feel they have status.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Arrogance Posted by: Romantic Violence
» RE: The Arrogance Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: The Arrogance Posted by: Romantic Violence
nuclear is not the answer
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Nov 8, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Building more nuclear power plants is a HUGE waste of taxpayer money. They do not have any solution to waste, they let it pile up. They also do not include a lot of the costs when they are selling the idea.

The fact the Democrats support nuclear energy only shows us they are stupid and corrupt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]