Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What Tuesday's Elections Really Mean

Posted by Adele Stan, AlterNet at 7:47 AM on November 4, 2009.


It was a big night for the right, winning state houses in New Jersey and Virginia, defeating same-sex marriage in Maine -- and electing a Democrat in New York State.
adeleheadshot

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Politics in your
mailbox!

 

While the mainstream media yammer relentlessly about what last night's election results say about President Barack Obama, the real question is what they say about the power of the organized right wing of the Republican Party.

Yes, Obama campaigned vigorously for New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, who lost narrowly to Republican Chris Christe, and less so for Virginia gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds, who lost by double digits to Republican Bob McDonnell. But those races turned on local issues more than anything on the Obama agenda.

In New Jersey, mounting property taxes -- a circumstance over which a governor has little control -- combined with high unemployment figures to put the electorate in a sour mood toward the incumbent. Add to that a major corruption scandal in North Jersey that didn't involve Corzine, but emcompassed a prominent member of his administration, added to the ill will.

Virginia's Deeds lost to McDonnell on what should have been a Democratic issue: transportation. Unemployment figures for Virginia are far below those of New Jersey, but in the home state of Thomas Jefferson, just getting to your job can be a source of misery.

But more than anything, the results of these races, taken together with the peculiar special election in the 23rd congressional district of New York State and the vote against same-sex marriage in Maine, offer one resounding warning: the right is getting its act together, organizing up a storm.

In the New York state congressional race, right-wingers led by Dick Armey (and given a big boost by Sarah Palin) forced Republican candidate Dede Scozzafava from the race, backing Doug Hoffman, a third-party contender in a throw-down with GOP leaders. Scozzafava, you see, wasn't a winger: she even supports the Employee Free Choice Act -- the thing I believe really drew the scorn of Armey and his conferates, even more than Scozzafava's support of same-sex marriage and reproductive rights.

With the help some marquee friends, including Palin, former Sen. Fred Thompson, and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Armey marshalled the forces of the Tea Party movement, which he helped to create via FreedomWorks, the astroturfing group he chairs. And even though Hoffman went on to lose the election as the Conservative Party candidate for Congress, the victory is still Armey's; going into the 2010 mid-term elections, he has successfully defined who is and is not an acceptable Republican candidate.

In Virginia, McDonnell won by whistling past his religious-right roots with the help of campaign manager Phil Cox, who is currently on leave, according to the Virginian-Pilot,  from his post at Americans For Prosperity, another powerful astroturfing group that has been organizing protests against health-care reform and climate-change legislation. McDonnell's roots with AFP run deep. Americans For Prosperity President Tim Phillips is a former campaign adviser for McDonnell, and the governor-elect did legal work for the group, the Pilot reports.

Up the seacoast in Maine, same-sex marriage, legalized by the state legislature earlier this year, was defeated largely through the efforts of the National Organization for Marriage -- an outfit closely allied with the Family Research Council -- with a major assist from the Catholic church. FRC is one of the powerhouse organizations of the religious right, and its leaders know how to turn out a vote.

And Jersey, sweet Jersey, my home state...sigh. Usually vituperatively moderate in its collective electoral disposition, New Jersey has see the rise of a Tea Party movement of its own. In a close race, I fear the Tea Partiers made a difference by not throwing in with the third-party candidate, Chris Daggett, and instead backing the Republican Christie. I mean, with Joe "You Lie" Wilson on your team, you're sure to bring in the wing nuts. Oh, and Corzine's fat joke about his opponent sure didn't help. We're not exactly (PDF) a state of skinny people.

 

Digg!

Tagged as: creigh deeds, nom, bob mcdonnell, doug hoffman, jon corzine, 2009 elections, same-sex marriage maine, new jersey gubernatorial, virginia gubernatorial, bill owens, national organization for

Adele M. Stan is AlterNet's Washington bureau chief.


Hard-liners Peddle Zombie Lies About Immigrants and Crime
A new report flies in the face of 100 years of data showing immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes than the native-born.
Post by Walter Ewing. November 22, 2009.
Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 4, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In New Jersey I believe that Corzine lost because voting for the 'fat guy' was meant to be a vote AGAINST Wall Street (which is still there this morning). There's nothing wrong in NJ that isn't wrong all over the country. Things over which he has no control. Too much moral judgement goes along with voting. It's not just politics anymore. There's too much wrong in this country for moral issues to rule the elections. In the end, many things can't be legislated for that reason. Many votes in the end don't matter. The do however put the wrong people in office. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sucker!
Posted by: sirios on Nov 4, 2009 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the republicans fault. Ok then put the democrats in charge that should fix the problem. Hmm, didn't work, now it's the democrats fault, so lets put the republicans back in charge. Well, thats strange that didn't work either. Ok, lets vote in the democrats, that will fix it. Everything is ok for a little while and now something is wrong again. Oh, must be the democrats are doing something wrong. Hey i have an idea let's reinstate the republicans, that should do it. thats really strange i was sure that they could fix everything. well I seem to be getting old and losing my memory , let's see, oh yeah it's those fuc#$%^ republicans that messed things up. I better vote for the democrats next time and finally we won't have these problems. I'm kind of worn out, i think i'll just take a short nap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Virginia continues the tradition
Posted by: jebpgh on Nov 4, 2009 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looking at the history of governor races in Virginia is pretty enlightening. Not only do the voters of Virginia seem to rotate parties on a regular basis since 1970 - they apparently seem to vote the opposite party in to whomever is sitting in the White House. This is true since 1977. Here in Pennsylvania, we have come to actually expect that the opposition party will lose the second term of the incumbent for governor only to win the mansion the following election. Governor races are fought out over local issues - particularly taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't believe the victory is Armey's
Posted by: badkitty on Nov 4, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't believe the victory is Dick Armey's--the Republicans lost a seat they've held for over 100 years. The Democrats added to their majority in the House--they held Tauscher's seat, and added this new guy (sorry, I can't remember his name!). I believe Garamendi is going to be sworn in right away, so he can vote this weekend on healthcare if necessary. Perhaps the New Yorker will be too.

It is definitely too bad about losing the governorships on the eve of the new census, but perhaps if the Republicans don't hold the state assemblies/senates, things won't go bad in redistricting (although that district in New York definitely sucks--what a piece of gerrymandering).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Analysis
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 4, 2009 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I think the results in upstate New York show that the Republican party's recent move to the far(ther)-right will only hurt them.

As for Corzine/Christie/Dagget: I heard (from leftwing sources) that Christie has ties to Bush. That's very bad. But with Corzine's campaign making fun of Christie's weight, I kind of hoped a little that Christie would win. Yes, I'm disappointed about the outcome, but not totally disappointed. No one should have gotten so personal during the election.

As for Maine: In all 31 states that have had votes on gay-marriage, gay-marriage has lost in ALL of them. Maybe this should be a lesson to all of us: Americans are for the most part hateful bigots. Real people's lives have been destroyed by these votes. No one (NO ONE) would have been hurt, on the other hand, if any of the votes on gay-marriage had gone the other way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fat Guy Defeats Fat Cat would be my headline
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 4, 2009 3:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
was an issue mad of Corzine's Wall Street ties? maybe we can push the narrative that Obama should dump his Wall Street/Goldman Sachs biased economic team, and install a Main Street economists who are real liberals and not neoliberal (or as I like to call them crypto conservatives corporate welfare types.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]