Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"I Am Not Trying to Kill Health Reform," Says House Blue Dog Bart Stupak -- Is It True?

Posted by Bruce Wilson, AlterNet at 1:00 PM on October 29, 2009.


Blue Dogs were "magnificent" at killing health reform in 1990's, says Stupak's pro-life caucus co-chair.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Politics in your
mailbox!

 

Blue Dog Democrats in Congress played a "magnificent" role in blocking health care reform during the Clinton administration. And, under the "courageous" and "smart" leadership of House Pro-Life Caucus leader, Michigan Democrat Bart Stupak, with the support and prayers of Republicans categorically opposed to the Democratic Party's health care reform effort, the Blue Dogs may be able to do it again.

That's what Stupak's caucus co-chair Chris Smith (R-NJ) told the audience at a "townhall" panel event on Friday September 18th at the Family Research Council Action's Washington DC 2009 Values Voter Summit [see attached video and transcript]. Another Republican at the event, Tom Price (R-GA), suggested that lockstep GOP opposition to health care reform affords the Blue Dogs "an opportunity to show some backbone" and "stand up to their leadership to say 'no more will we allow this travesty to go on.'"

In an October 29 op-ed for The Hill, Stupak protests, “[r]ecent news articles have reported that I am trying to “kill” healthcare reform, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.” In his Hill op-ed, Bart Stupak writes, “[o]ur healthcare system is broken and I believe reform is necessary.” As usual, the devil is in the details.

Representative Stupak has repeatedly said that his anti-abortion caucus has enough Democratic Party votes to ally with Republicans to block the health care bill from going to the house floor and Stupak is demanding, in exchange for not blocking the bill, that he be allowed to introduce an amendment to H.R. 3200 that would definitively prevent the new health care program from funding abortions.

According to Stupak his amendment probably would pass because polls show that a clear majority of Americans are opposed to the government funding of abortions. But if the amendment passes, the Democratic Party pro-choice voting block in the House may withdraw its support of H.R. 3200, leaving House leadership without enough votes to pass the bill.

However, Bart Stupak’s agenda seems to go beyond simply preventing federally funded abortions and could be viewed as a back-door effort that could make abortion services unavailable to most Americans. A recent study by the Guttmacher Institute found that 87% of US counties lacked abortion providers but the health care amendment Stupak has co-sponsored together with GOP Representative Joe Pitts (R-PA) would bar not only publicly but also privately funded abortion coverage in a national health care exchange system; health care providers participating in the new health care system wouldn’t be allowed to offer abortion services at all.

One of Stupak’s statements even seems suggest he is opposed to a health care system which acknowledges any basic reproductive rights whatsoever. On Wednesday September 23rd, in an interview for the National Catholic Register, which bills itself as the nation's biggest Catholic pro-life publication, Bart Stupak warned that under public health care options, "At least one dollar of your money will go to supplement reproductive rights or abortion services."

The position and health care amendment seem almost tailored to offend reproductive rights advocates in the House and call into question Congressman Stupak’s assurance that he is acting in good will. Which in turn raises the issue of Bart Stupak’s involvement in The Family.

While Rep. Stupak has been careful to avoid giving the impression that he is categorically opposed to any health care reform bill, his associates and housemates in the powerful, secretive, and anti-democratic Washington Christian fundamentalist association known as The Family, or The Fellowship, have led much of the GOP’s most virulent opposition to health care reform.

Along with his health care amendment co-sponsor Joe Pitts ( R-PA ) Bart Stupak is a longtime member of the mainly-Republican radical free-market, union-busting theocratic fundamentalist group, which runs the "C Street House" that is registered as a church, where Bart Stupak has enjoyed Christian fellowship and cheap rent for years. Stupak's former "C Street" housemate Senator James DeMint (R-S. Carolina) has vowed to make the fight against health care reform President Barack Obama's "Waterloo".

Bart Stupak has been a longtime resident at The Family's now-infamous "C Street House" that over Summer 2009 became nationally notorious for a trio of sex scandals which enveloped three national GOP politicians who have lived at or been associated with the house. The C Street House provides below market rate rent, is registered as a church, and functions, according to journalist Jeff Sharlet, as an unregistered lobby. Sharlet is author of the 2008 NYT bestelling book The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at The Heart of American Power, a heavily researched exploration of the secretive but remarkably influential DC-based international fundamentalist group whose members are known to refer to their association as a "Christian mafia."

In a July conference call with journalists, Representative Stupak told Michigan Messenger reporter Ed Brayton, "I don't belong to any such group. I rent a room at a house in 'C Street.' I do not belong to any such group. I don't know what you're talking about, [The] Family and all this other stuff." But in an interview for a seminal 2002 LA Times article on The Family by journalist Lisa Getter, Stupak indicated he considered himself bound by a C Street House or Family code of secrecy, telling Getter, "We sort of don't talk to the press about the house." The C Street House is owned by a global missionary group whose founder advocates that Christians infiltrate and take over key sectors of society such as business, media, educations, and government.

One of Bart Stupak's housemates at C Street identified in Getter's article was then-South Carolina Congressman Jim DeMint, now a Senator. In a July 17th conference call DeMint told conservative activists, "if we're able to stop Obama on this [health care] it will be his Waterloo. It will break him and we will show that we can, along with the American people, begin to push those freedom solutions that work in every area of our society."

During the Summer of 2009 DeMint, author of the new book Saving Freedom: We Can Stop America's Slide into Socialism, held a "townhall" forum event which, as described by Editor of Editor & Publisher magazine Greg Mitchell, featured "lies and misinformation that came both from the crowd and the stage" which "probably exceeded what many might have imagined."

Longtime Family member and GOP Representative Todd Tiahrt (R-Kansas) also held a summer townhall forum promoting brazen falsehoods about proposed Democratic health care legislation. As described in Jeff Sharlet's groundbreaking 2003 Harpers story "Jesus Plus Nothing: Undercover Among America's Secret Theocrats," Tiahrt has had the benefit of personal personal tutelage from Family head Doug Coe. Exclusive video footage shown in an April 2008 NBC News story by Andrea Mitchell and Jim Popkin, from the late 1980s, showed Coe before an audience celebrating the dedication and political efficacy of Hitler's Nazis, Lenin's Bolshevik's, and Mao's Red Guard -- who during the Cultural Revolution demonstrated such dedication they were willing to chop off their own parent's heads for the good of the state according to Coe.

One of Bart Stupak's C Street housemates is Nevada Senator John Ensign, who has taken a lower profile since becoming embroiled in a summer C Street House-baeed sex scandal but made an appearance at an early September 2009 roundtable discussion with 20 health care professionals during which Ensign declared that if the Democrats "want a public option, it won't be bipartisan. I don't know a single Republican that, if there is maybe there's one, but I personally don't know of any Republican that could live with this so called public option. Because it will destroy, I believe, and most believe, that it will destroy the private insurance system."

Senior Republican member of the Senate Finance Committee and Family member Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) has played an outsized role in negotiations over possible health care legislation. As Grassley told the Wall Street Journal in late August, "Government is not a competitor, it's a predator." Criticizing the public option Grassley then declared, "[w]e'd have 120 million people opt out [of private insurance], then pretty soon everyone is in health care under the government and there's no competitor." As described in journalist Jeff Sharlet's book The Family, Grassley has at times served as Family head Doug Coe's personal international emissary.

Like Grassley, James Inhofe (R-Okla) has also served as Coe's personal representative, making repeated taxpayer-financed trips to Africa to evangelize African heads of state. In an early 2009 conversation with Washington evangelist Rev. Rob Schenck, Inhofe described visiting Africa in the mid 1990s, at the request of Doug Coe, to "take the name of Jesus" to "the kings". Inhofe has stated he will vote against any health care reform bill without even reading it first.

Although The Family's politics in the aggregate skew decidedly right the group's membership includes a number of centrist Democrats, such as Florida Senator Bill Nelson, who has opted to throw his substantial political weight behind Montana Senator and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus' compromise health care bill, H.R. 3200, which does not include a public option. Nelson's wife Grace has served on the board of the Fellowship Foundation, one of the main nonprofit organizational entities of the Family.

Founded in the 1930s as an anticommunist and union-busting initiative, The Family advocates a type of laissez-faire Christian theocracy called "Biblical Capitalism", in which a divinely ordained elite caste in business, government, and other sectors would beneficently rule the masses. As founder Abraham Vereide wrote in a pamphlet entitled Better Way, "We have entered into an era when the masses of the people are dependent on a rapidly diminishing number of leaders for the determination of their way of life and the definition of their ultimate goals. It is the age of minority control."

In a recent Salon.com article, Jeff Sharlet explained that The Family "began 74 years ago as an anti-New Deal coalition of businessmen convinced that organized labor was under the sway of Satan. The Great Depression, they believed, was a punishment from God for what they viewed as FDR's socialism."



[video transcript, from September 18, 2009 Family Research Council Values Voter Summit, “Townhall” event on health care reform]

Questioner:

Hi. It's been said that the main roadblock to this legislation in the House are the Blue Dog Democrats. I actually happen to think it's the pro-life Democrats. And I'm just wondering - I also read on a pro-life blog not long ago -- that Steny Hoyer was apoplectically reaming the pro-life Democrats after a vote sometime ago.

I'm just wondering -- are you all confident that the pro-life Democrats are not going to have their arms twisted by Nancy Pelosi and that they are going to not waver from this and, more specifically, what are you all as Republicans doing to voice solidarity with them -- because I think if there's any group in the Congress right now that needs our prayers it's those courageous pro-life Democrats.

Rep. Chris Smith:

It's an excellent question. Bart Stupak from Michigan is the co-chair of the Congressional Pro-Life Caucus -- I'm the Republican chair, he's the Democrat -- [he] has been absolutely valiant and brave and courageous, and very smart. He and Joe Pitts, who is also a Republican on the Energy and Commerce Committee, crafted an amendment that would take abortion out -- completely -- from ObamaCare. And their amendment initially won in the committee, amazingly, only to have a parliamentary maneuver pulled, a couple of arms were twisted, and they were able to, on the pro-abortion side, eke out a very small, narrow victory. And then on what's known as the CAPS Amendment, which is a very, very pro-abortion amendment...

Uh, I agree with the questioner... the pro-life Democrats, and there are fewer now then when we went through this trial with HillaryCare...uh, and they too, during that difficult time, were magnificent -- standing there with an amendment saying that, "we will not be part of the greatest expansion of abortion in United States history since Roe vs. Wade." So Bart Stupak, and people like Jim Oberstar from Minnesota, and others, have signed letters to the speaker and to the president saying that they will not vote for ObamaCare unless all the pro-life problems, the pro-abortion problems, have been rectified.

And so your call for prayer -- Bart is a very principled lawmaker. And a man who is, a can tell you -- because we know what it's like behind the scenes. What we see in front of the scenes is bad enough. But he is not well liked by certain elements of the Democratic coalition. So he needs our prayers, he needs our support, and he is a very, very courageous man and I greatly admire him. So thank you for that question.

Rep. Tom Price:

Let me just take one minute if I may. I'd be remiss if I didn't say that the opportunity that the Blue Dogs have, to finally show some backbone, is because of the unanimity of the Republican Conference in the House of Representatives -- standing united against this remarkable government takeover of health care.

It is imperative to remember that every single Blue Dog voted for Nancy Pelosi to be Speaker of the House. And, you've got to remember that because that's the individual that sets the agenda for the House of Representatives.


Digg!

Tagged as: health care, c street, bart stupak

Bruce Wilson writes for Talk To Action, a blog specializing in faith and politics.


Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
"Biblical Capitalism", "Prosperity Theology" - other names for naked greed
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale on Oct 29, 2009 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sickening how these people have twisted the Bible for their own purposes.

Founded in the 1930s as an anticommunist and union-busting initiative, The Family advocates a type of laissez-faire Christian theocracy called "Biblical Capitalism", in which a divinely ordained elite caste in business, government, and other sectors would beneficently rule the masses. As founder Abraham Vereide wrote in a pamphlet entitled Better Way, "We have entered into an era when the masses of the people are dependent on a rapidly diminishing number of leaders for the determination of their way of life and the definition of their ultimate goals. It is the age of minority control."

These people are frightening in their self-delusion, blindness and arrogance. Every one of these politicians should be subject to a special-prosecutor investigation a la Ken Starr. Are they following their oaths and serving the constituents who put them in office? Doesn't seem so to me. Seems their loyalties are to anything BUT the Constitution and the law. Their jobs have been hijacked by this cult. I don't believe the accused Communists purged during McCarthyism had done anything even close to impeding legislation on the Hill the way this group has.

These people are bent on enriching themselves and the power elite at the expense of the American people and should be treated as the traitors they are. And traitors is a nice word. They are also creepy, narcissistic perverts, for starters. They need to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good ol' Rep Stupidpak
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 29, 2009 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
goddamn, I'm glad I don't live in this piece of shit's district.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupak Stays Under the Radar
Posted by: Arlene on Oct 29, 2009 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since he represents a sparsely populated impoverished district in Michigan, a state which has been deciminated by NAFTA and the banksters, his constituents are mostly in survival mode and vote out of simple inertia.

He won the seat from Bob Davis after the Congressional Post Office scandal wherein Davis had the second highest number of bad checks charged to his account. The district had been solidly Republican until Stupak won office.

The Catholic Church has a lot of clout, although with the priest scandals and economy, that may be changing. Women who live in his district who need an abortion need to travel to Milwaukee or downstate Lower Michigan for service.

He is good on labor issues, because he owes his seat to the unions still operating in his district.

I am a retiree volunteering in a hospital pharmacy. Recently a woman experienced a pregnancy that had implanted on her cervix. There was no way this would end well. It took a complex (and expensive) medical abortion using methotrexate over several days to abort the pregnancy which certainly would have threatened her life if it continued. Under the Stupak-proposed legislation, she would have had to continue until her life actually was in danger before the pregnancy could be terminated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It So Bothers Me
Posted by: Wacre on Oct 30, 2009 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It so bothers me when people attempt to push their views upon people they don't even know; and to be honest I think can give a shite about in real terms.

Sure, it's easy to care about people as hypotheticals; a little more difficult to actually change the behaviors that are actually causing the problems in the first place.

Like...I don't know, imposing your closed-minded, dated, parochial world-view on others?

I am a guy, and since I don't have the ability to have children (as in pregnancy) I think that I should shut the frak up.

That's not to say that I don't have a opinion about it, but until the day comes when I can carry a fetus for nine months or so (a time I do not look all forward to. Hell, I kinda feel sorry that women have to go through it, to be honest) then I think that I should just shut up and leave this one to the people that have to do the heavy lifting in this one.

And that's women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oops!
Posted by: pbutler on Oct 30, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The scandalous Senator John Ensign is an embarrassment to the voters of the state of Nevada; Arizona's delegation has its own problems, but having a senatorial Daddy pay off a mistress plucked from a staffer's nuptial bed is not yet one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dog Hot Dog?
Posted by: flymulla on Oct 30, 2009 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No I thank you I am a Muslim and I not allowed to go near the swine or dogs or the lions I like to see Tom and Jerry Thay are so funny. No? The Dog always wins and Jery, but the pussy loses. Why? Now Uncle Sam needs money so all must buy the insurances. Nice guilds, magic, guides etc ? Eh?
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
ASEAN Addresses Natural Disaster Risk

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupak Not a Blue Dog
Posted by: djjohnso on Nov 7, 2009 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... change the title here, please. Stupak does not caucus with the Blue Dogs. Furthermore, his positions are totally not in keeping with other Blue Dog positions. He voted against the authorization for the Iraq War. He voted against the initial bank bailout bill. He initially voted against Bill Clinton's Welfare Reform. He voted against NAFTA. How can you possibly call someone like that a Blue Dog?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]