Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

GOP Senate Obstructionists Trying to Reverse 2008 Election

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 2:33 PM on October 24, 2009.


They don't seem to understand who won.
headandshoulderstight
Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer with AlterNet.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

According to People for the American Way, dozens of Barack Obama's nominees -- many in key positions -- are still waiting to get started as Republicans threaten to filibuster their confirmation and the White House and senate leadership seem (inexplicably) cautious about using their 60-vote majority to ram them through. It's largely flown under the radar.

TPM:

In 1949, a change to Senate rules allowed members to filibuster executive branch nominees. Senators tend to believe (or at least to say) that, within bounds of decency, the White House deserves to be able to staff the executive branch as it chooses; and in the 60 years since then, the practice has been used sparingly.

Until Barack Obama came to town.

"Between 1949 and 2009 there were 24 nominees on which cloture was forced," Baker said. "In just the first 9 months of the Obama administration, there have been five such votes."

Despite a record of rather extreme appointments, there were 7 cloture votes during the 8 years of the Bush administration. Of the 29 times such votes have occurred in American history, 20 have been over Democratic nominees and 9 over Republicans. Not surprisingly, before Obama took office, over half of all cloture votes of executive branch appointees had occurred during the Clinton administration -- 13.

Bubba holds the record, but Obama is on pace to shatter it with cloture votes on 28 nominees, more than all other administrations since 1949 combined.

I would just point out how ridiculous this makes the whole wing-nut kerfuffle about Obama's "communist" and unaccountable "czars" -- the officials he is supposedly slipping in around the senate confirmation process. Not that it wasn't already ridiculous -- George W. Bush appointed more czars than Obama, and several of those Fox News and others have attacked as unconfirmed czars (8 out of 30) were actually customary positions filled by people who were in fact duly approved by Congress. But the hypocrisy of leveling the charge while dozens of Obama's appointees still await confirmation 9 months into his term in office is mind-jangling.

Finally, let me just add that People for the American Way is especially interested in one nominee whose block by Republicans has been particularly galling: Dawn Johnsen, Obama's pick to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Council. OLC advises the executive branch on the law, and during the Bush administration it was packed with right-wing ideologues with an expansive view of executive power (to say the least). It's where  people like "torture memo" authors Jay Bybee and John Yoo basically told the White House it could do anything it wanted as long as they said it had something to do with terrorism.

Johnsen's eminently qualified -- she served as acting head of OLC during the Clinton years, she's been endorsed by former heads of the OLC under both Republican and Democratic administrations; her Republican senator, Dick Lugar, has endorsed her.

The problem for the GOP -- aside from their instinctive desire to play petty games with Obama's nominees -- is that she's really good.  As The New York Times reported, her appointment to head the OLC after the Bybees and Yoos brought it so much well earned infamy represents the kind of change Obama promised but has so far failed to deliver in many other areas:

Ms. Johnsen, a law professor at Indiana University, was an unsparing critic of memorandums, written by lawyers at the Office of Legal Counsel in the Bush administration, that said the president could largely ignore international treaties and Congress in fighting terrorists and that critics have portrayed as allowing torture in interrogation.

The broad reading of presidential authority was “outlandish,” and the constitutional arguments were “shockingly flawed,” Ms. Johnsen has written. While her language was harsh, the memos have largely been withdrawn, and among lawyers a consensus agreeing with her views has emerged.

Nonetheless, Republicans have denounced her comments.

If you'd like to see Dawn Johnsen's nomination get an up or down vote, sign PFAW's petition here.

Digg!

Tagged as: gop, obama, obstructionism, johnsen


Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Our Tax Dollars at Work.
Posted by: Longdream on Oct 24, 2009 5:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Makes me want to go see George W. Bush speak at a motivational seminar to cheer myself up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Tax Dollars at Work. Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Our Tax Dollars at Work. Posted by: VZEQICVA
GOP legislative agenda
Posted by: wrinklemomma on Oct 24, 2009 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Step One: Stand on the floor of your respective chamber.
Step Two: Wait for a Democrat to introduce an item of business.
Step Three: Place both thumbs in respective ears. Waggle fingers and chant "LALALALALALALA" as long as the Democrat continues to speak.
Step Four: Vote "NO" on whatever the item was.
Step Five: Visit your home district and tell your constituents what a fine job you're doing on their behalf and beg for more campaign funds.
Step Six: Shut up and blow away. Please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

short-sighted and forgetful, as usual
Posted by: ulyssesmsu on Oct 25, 2009 2:14 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In condemning the congressional Republicans by citing "their instinctive desire to play petty games with Obama's nominees," you seem to have forgotten that the Democrats have done the very same thing with every Republican president since at least Nixon, if not long before.

Both parties play this game, so why not be fair about it and not pretend that it is just Republicans who are "petty"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Virginia Election News–Media Fails to Report on Misprision of a Felony by Bob McDonnell et al.
Posted by: IsidoroRDL on Oct 26, 2009 3:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» OK, but off-topic? Posted by: aislinnluv
Many chinks...
Posted by: adp3d on Oct 26, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in the armor of the Democratic Party, that is one of the things we are best known for. The Republics are just trying to exploit that, trying to drive wedgies between us. In the end they are going to have to turn to the left or else they go off the cliff and be diminished to the extent that they are no longer relevant and a new more centrist party will emerge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ummmm, huh?? Posted by: Fencerider
» RE: Many chinks... Posted by: Dak
Oh dear...
Posted by: Dak on Oct 26, 2009 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ROFLMBO!!! Sorry, Fencerider, my post should have come before yours, lolol. I am not in favor of wedgies from global concerns. IMHO... the Republicans are already doomed... or maybe just wedgied out of existence. Yiyiyiyi.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is the filibuster in the Constitution?
Posted by: january37 on Oct 27, 2009 7:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please correct me if I'm wrong:

The filibuster is a law passed by the Senate with a majority vote. As such it can be rescinded by majority vote. Also, the filibuster has been very detrimental to progressive causes most of the time when it has been used. I say, the Senate should pass a law that the filibuster is no longer in effect and push forward with progressive legislation -- INCLUDING AN AMERICARE (SINGLE-PAYER)HEALTH PLAN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti American to the Core
Posted by: devans00 on Oct 29, 2009 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do I read articles like this? They just make me angry about the Anti-American, anti-human hypocracy of the Republicans.

If they don't want to abide by democracy rules country, they should leave. Let the rest of us who believe in elections and that Congress should represent their human constituents, get on with it.

Republicans can go pout in the corner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]