Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

John Kerry Delivers in Afghanistan

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 8:10 AM on October 22, 2009.


It's nice to John Kerry get some well-deserved credit.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

It's nice to John Kerry get some well-deserved credit.

Sen. John Kerry's successful mission to Kabul -- in which he convinced Afghan President Hamid Karzai to hold a second-round runoff to August's fraud-soaked election -- suggests that the Obama administration is putting the squeeze on Karzai to clean up his act as a precondition to getting more U.S. troops to help fight his war.

The squeeze was subtler -- or, at least quieter -- than the yelling sessions that AfPak envoy Richard Holbrooke and Vice President Joe Biden -- both famously voluble characters -- have held with Karzai in recent months.

Yet a chronology of Kerry's "shuttle diplomacy" pieced together by ABC News shows the Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate foreign-relations committee meeting with Karzai six times, some sessions for hours at a stretch, during a five-day trip to Afghanistan and Pakistan Oct. 16-20 -- each visit at the behest of, and in consultation with, Holbrooke and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

U.S. officials agreed that a runoff was necessary to maintain at least some confidence among the Afghan population in the legitimacy of its government. Karzai didn't much care, and was poised to ignore the report of international investigators who documented election irregularities.

Given recent incidents in which Holbrooke and Biden expressed their disdain for Karzai's conduct, it fell to Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to convince the Afghan president. It wasn't easy, but the senator's efforts paid off, and the Obama administration got the results it wanted.

Marc Ambinder asked, "Has Sen. John Kerry ever had as good a press cycle?"

Indeed, most of the stories devoted to Kerry have the exact same analysis: Kerry was reluctantly thrust into the role of negotiator. Kerry developed Karzai's trust. Kerry had the diplomatic skills that current ambassador Karl Eikenberry lacked. Kerry's importuning proved to be the turning point. Oh, and it compares favorably to Kerry's brokering of a dialog between the U.S. and Syria earlier in the year.

The Boston Globe called it a "triumph" for Kerry -- his biggest accomplishment since the presidential race. The Wall Street Journal, along with many other publications, noted that Kerry used his own experience in 2004 to establish a better bond with Karzai.

And in case there are any doubts, these developments do not point to tensions between Kerry and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Just the opposite -- David Rogers reported that the two worked together on this: "Clinton, as secretary of state, helped clear the way with a long call to Karzai but also gave Kerry the room to run. And the result -- Karzai's agreement to hold a runoff election next month -- was a joint triumph for the onetime rivals."

Have I mentioned lately how nice it is to have grown-ups in positions of governmentant?

Digg!

Tagged as: afghanistan, kerry

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."


Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
ACORN: Another Super Villain with Super Powers
For the trembling patriots of the right.
Post by Steve M.. November 21, 2009.
Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 22, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama didn't blindly follow McChrystal's advice, and I like him for that. Kerry cut a deal for which he deserves credit. I do wish Cheney would shut up. His "stop dithering' comment was out of line. For 8 years Bush and Dick did nothing about Afganistan. He doesn't work here anymore. I don't understand why a former administration continues to have clout long after they've gone. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Viceroy and messenger boy
Posted by: oregoncharles on Oct 22, 2009 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Kerry delivers the imperial master's message to their dog-on-a-leash in Kabul, and he gets"full credit."?

Karzai is dishonest but not stupid: he knows the US KILLS flunkies who get out of line - witness Diem, Noriega, and Saddam Hussein. So does everyone else out there in the colonies. So he gave in.

Why, exactly, is it our business who is president of Afghanistan?

Oh yeah,it's because we installed him and we hold his leash. Big whoop. That isn't why Afghans are doing their best to kill Americans, is it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Viceroy and messenger boy Posted by: Doubtom43
Is this supposed to be a good thing
Posted by: jareilly on Oct 22, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a face-saving exercise for Karzai, Kerry and Obama, a show produced mostly for domestic consumption. Karzai is more or less powerless outside Kabul. Abdullah is an unscrupulous warlord who has a private army and no doubt, lots of involvement in the native growth industry - poppy farming and heroin production.

The Taliban violently disrupted that last two elections, and now with time to gear up, is likely to do worse. What will the dubious outcome of these "run-off" elections mean, with low turn-out and a face-off between a thug and a hand-picked puppet. Who benefits? What will change inside Afghanistan?

yeah, I suppose we should be glad an American administration actually took claims of election fraud seriously, but as usual, the big questions are never asked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kerry as "might have been"
Posted by: zipper696 on Oct 23, 2009 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of expert diplomacy and energetic hustling to get stuff done make we wonder once again the "might have been" if Kerry had not been Swift Boated by Karl Rove's flunkies.

I just get pissy all over again remembering haw the draft dodger and 5 deferements Veep stole the Presidency from a decorated patriot.

Excuse me while I go have a beer and cool off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]