Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Poll: Public Prefers Dem-only Bill With a Public Option

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 5:00 AM on October 5, 2009.


Obviously, the public's desire for bipartisanship is pretty limited.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

THE DESIRE FOR BIPARTISANSHIP IS NOT UNLIMITED.... There have been several national polls of late pointing, much to my chagrin, to strong public support for "bipartisan" health care reform. A New York Times/CBS News poll released in late September, for example, found that the public strongly disapproves of Republican efforts, but nevertheless wants Democrats to get GOP support before passing a bill.

The latest nonpartisan Research 2000 poll for Daily Kos, however, put a twist on the question and found an interesting result.

Which of the following scenarios do you prefer/ do you prefer?

Getting a health care bill with the choice of a strong public health insurance option to compete with private insurance plans that's supported only by Democrats in Congress, OR Getting a health care bill with no public option that has the support of Democrats and a handful of Republicans?

Public option: 52%
No public option: 39%


Even self-identified independents preferred the Dem-only bill with a public option, 47% to 42%.

Greg Sargent highlighted the significance of the poll: "It's true that other polls have found that majorities prefer that the final bill be bipartisan. But here's the rub: The previous polls asked the question in isolation -- do you want a bipartisan bill, or a partisan one -- without explaining to respondents that winning over Republicans could result in actual policy consequences that they might not like. The above is a more accurate framing of the choice the public -- and lawmakers -- face right now."

Something for on-the-fence lawmakers to consider: bipartisanship is popular, but the public option is considered more important.

Digg!

Tagged as: bipartisanship, public option

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."


What Does College Football Have to Do With Abortion? Tons, According to Anti-Choice Wingnuts
The brouhaha over Notre Dame is an opportunity for the right to wage war on women, intellectuals and sexual freedom all at once.
Post by Amanda Marcotte. December 23, 2009.
Disney's "The Princess and the Frog" Actually Contains a Powerful Message About Post-Katrina New Orleans
The film, which features Disney's first African-American princess, supplies admirable political allegory.
Post by Melissa Harris-Lacewell. December 23, 2009.
How Obama Pushed Hard For a Public Option, Then Bailed When It Mattered Most
Despite his history of supporting the government-run insurance plan, Obama did little to pressure lawmakers when it mattered most.
Post by Zaid Jilani. December 22, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?