Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Harvard Study: Lack of Insurance Causes 45,000 Deaths Every Year

Posted by Staff, AlterNet at 7:15 AM on September 18, 2009.


That's one every 12 Seconds on average.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

New York Times:

As the White House and Congress continue debating how best to provide coverage to tens of millions of Americans currently without health insurance, a new study (PDF) is meant to offer a stark reminder of why lawmakers should continue to try. Researchers from Harvard Medical School say the lack of coverage can be tied to about 45,000 deaths a year in the United States — a toll that is greater than the number of people who die each year from kidney disease.

“If you extend coverage, you can save lives,” said Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, a professor of medicine at Harvard who is one of the study’s authors. The research is being published in the December issue of the American Journal of Public Health and was posted online Thursday.

The Harvard study found that people without health insurance had a 40 percent higher risk of death than those with private health insurance — as a result of being unable to obtain necessary medical care. The risk appears to have increased since 1993, when a similar study found the risk of death was 25 percent greater for the uninsured.

The increase in risk, according to the study, is likely to be a result of at least two factors. One is the greater difficulty the uninsured have today in finding care, as public hospitals have closed or cut back on services. The other is improvements in medical care for insured people with treatable chronic conditions like high blood pressure.

Digg!

Tagged as: uninsured, harvard, mortality, health-care


Will Joe Lieberman Be the Only Dem to Sabotage Health Reform?
Joe Lieberman will work with Republicans to kill health care reform, no matter the consequences for the millions who are counting on this bill to pass.
Post by Steve Benen. November 24, 2009.
What Does it Mean to Take Sarah Palin and the Tea-Bagger Set "Seriously"?
I know we're supposed to, but ...
Post by Joshua Holland. November 24, 2009.
Everyone's Talking About Stupak, But What About the Health Care Bill's More Insidious Features?
The current bill involves some quietly coercive (and racist) provisions that no one wants to mention.
Post by Jill Filipovic. November 24, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Death Panels, you know
Posted by: QQOblivion on Sep 18, 2009 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANOTHER DIMENSION TO 'INSURANCE FOR EVERYONE'
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 18, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aside from the obvious 'treatment for disease'. We have moral and ethical obligations to each other. In the European countries where everyone has access to care they do not understand how anyone can possibly lose a house, go bankrupt or die because they are unable to see a doctor. It's incomprehensible to them. It should be to us as well. We look at all these European countries where medical is free and the people like it. What we don't see is there tax brakets. 55% is not unusual. Lawsuits are capped but so is physician compensation. I think it's impossible to offer care to everyone, the way we should without expecting to pay a few extra bucks. But it's a smll price to pay. Simply put, people are dying in our country because they don't meet the standards of those worth insuring. That has nothing to do with good economice sense, it has to do with attitudes in serious need of adjustment. If we can't come up with a fair way to insure everyone, it's because we don't want to. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oops
Posted by: JimWhiteGNV on Sep 18, 2009 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For 45,000 deaths a year, that's one every 12 minutes instead of every 12 seconds, but of course, this is clearly intolerable at either rate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IS ALTERNET PUSHING MANDATED HEALTH INSURANCE?
Posted by: smf1403 on Sep 21, 2009 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CAN ANYONE SAY MANDATE???

THIS HARVARD STUDY (ISN'T THAT WHERE OBAMA WENT) IS SIMPLY REINFORCING THE BRAINWASHING BY OBAMA THAT HIS HEALTH INSURANCE PROPOSAL TO FORCE ALL PEOPLE TO BUY INSURANCE IS WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT.

SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE (NO INSURANCE COMPANY MIDDLE-MAN) IS WHAT OBAMA AND CONGRESS ENJOY!!

WHY SHOULD ALL THE PEOPLE NOT SHARE IN THIS BASIC HUMAN RIGHT TO HAVE HEALTH CARE (SINGLE-PAYER)?

OBAMA, ALTERNET AND HARVARD WANT YOU TO BUY INTO OBAMA'S MANDATE (PUBLIC OPTION)AND CONTINUE TO SUPPORT HIS WELFARE TO THE RICH (BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES, MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, ETC.)

DON'T FALL FOR IT! WAKE UP!!

OBAMA IS JUST ANOTHER SMOOTH-TALKING, PRETTY FACE. THE PEOPLE OVERLOOKED HIS VOTES IN CONGRESS FOR THE CORPORATIONS. HE IS NOT FOR THE PEOPLE AND NEVER WAS. HE IS NOT A NICE GUY.

SUPPORT DENNIS KUCINICH!!! SINGLE-PAYER MEDICARE FOR ALL!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]