Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Amazon Issues Lame, Insufficient Apology for Deleting "1984" From Kindles

Posted by tristero, Hullabaloo at 9:19 AM on July 27, 2009.


As long as it is technically feasible to alter or erase information, these devices are dangerous to a free society.
1984

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Amazon's apologized for its Orwellian behavior in deleting 1984 from users' Kindles without telling anyone or asking permission.
Big deal. That's nowhere enough. In fact, neither is this:

A growing number of civil libertarians and customer advocates wants Amazon to fundamentally alter its method for selling Kindle books, lest it be forced to one day change or recall books, perhaps by a judge ruling in a defamation case -- or by a government deciding a particular work is politically damaging or embarrassing.
“As long as Amazon maintains control of the device it will have this ability to remove books and that means they will be tempted to use it or they will be forced to it,” said Holmes Wilson, campaigns manager of the Free Software Foundation.
The foundation, based in Boston, is soliciting signatures from librarians, publishers and major authors and public intellectuals. This week it plans to present a petition to Amazon asking it to give up control over the books people load on their Kindles

Sorry, but as long as it is technically feasible to alter and/or erase information, these devices are fundamentally, profoundly dangerous to a free society. Merely promising to give up control is not enough. It must be impossible to alter the content of a book, magazine, newspaper, etc once a user has purchased it, for any reason whatsoever. And alterations a reader does make must be clearly marked as such the way it is impossible now to alter a copy of a book without knowing it has been altered.
Since that is a daunting, if not hopeless, task for a digital gadget devoted to the sale of books and other print products -- and since I want to own my books, not license them -- I, for one, have little interest at this point in getting one.

Digg!

Tagged as: amazon, 1984, george orwell, kindle


How Obama Pushed Hard For a Public Option, Then Bailed When It Mattered Most
Despite his history of supporting the government-run insurance plan, Obama did little to pressure lawmakers when it mattered most.
Post by Zaid Jilani. December 22, 2009.
We Have a Winner! Sarah Palin's "Death Panel" Fallacy Named "Lie of the Year"
The award was bequeathed by Politifact, an independent fact-checker.
Post by Steve Benen. December 22, 2009.
Thanks to Dems' Pussyfooting, Health Industry Stocks Shoot Skyward
The bump does not appear to be indicative of broader economic improvement.
Post by Byard Duncan. December 22, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?