Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Afghanistan Is the Ideal Destination for Would-Be War Profiteers

Posted by Digby, Hullabaloo at 4:15 AM on July 20, 2009.


The Obama administration is shortchanging the auditors responsible for ensuring that taxpayer dollars don't go into the pockets of swindlers.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Please say this isn't happening again:
 

After the legendary corruption of the Iraq occupation—private contractors fashioning spurs for their cowboy boots from stolen Iraqi gold, vanishing pallets of shrink-wrapped cash—you'd think the US government would be keeping an extra-close watch on the reconstruction effort in Afghanistan. But you'd be wrong. Who says so? The guy in charge of rooting out corruption. Even as the Obama administration steps up spending in Afghanistan, it's shortchanging the government auditors responsible for ensuring that taxpayer dollars don't wind up in the pockets of swindlers and opportunists.

Afghanistan already places fifth in Transparency International's annual ranking of the most corrupt nations in the world. The US plans to spend nearly $14 billion there over the next financial year on military operations and reconstruction projects, up from about $11 billion this year. Yet Arnold Fields, the official charged with keeping track of this money—as well as foreign investment in US-sponsored programs—says in an interview with Mother Jones that he lacks the tools for the job.

[...]

Perhaps more so than Iraq, Afghanistan is an ideal destination for would-be war profiteers. As Fields told members of the House Armed Services Committee in March, "Iraq had much more upon which to build…We are really constructing as opposed to reconstructing in Afghanistan." At the time of the US invasion in 2003, Iraq boasted the world's third-largest oil reserves, a per-capita annual income of $4,000, an average life expectancy of 70 years, and 74 percent literacy. Afghanistan, by contrast, has no natural resources to speak of, per-capita annual income is just $800, life expectancy is a dismal 45 years, and only 28 percent of the population can read or write. It has precious few paved roads, no railways, and only four airports with runways suitable for large aircraft. Its mountainous, landlocked geography is a haven for insurgents. Moreover, whereas Iraq under Saddam Hussein possessed a corps of competent technocrats, Afghanistan's civil society has been decimated by more than 30 years of uninterrupted warfare. Much of the countryside is now under the sway of tribal warlords and devoted to harvesting opium, by far the country's most lucrative industry.

Corruption thrives in such conditions.


No kidding.



If this happens in yet another administration somebody might get the mistaken idea that it's a feature, not a bug.


Digg!

Tagged as: war, corruption, afghanistan, profiteers, swindlers

Digby is the proprietor of Hullabaloo.


Conservative Bishop Denies Kennedy His Holy Cracker*
Is God cool with us picking and choosing Her teachings?
Post by Joshua Holland. November 23, 2009.
Christian Rappers Demand 'Christian Side Hugs': 'I'm a Rough Rider, Filled With Christ's Love!'
Christian side hugs for everyone!
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 23, 2009.
The Most Racist Sheriff in America's Worst Nightmare: Meet Salvador Reza (Video)
THe Air Force veteran, community organizer and immigrants rights activist, joins Laura for an exclusive interview on Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s ongoing mistreatment of his community.
Post by Laura Flanders. November 23, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?