Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Afro-Netizen
All Spin Zone
Altercation
Americablog
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Another Iranian Online
August J. Pollak
Baghdad Burning
Barry Lando
Bloggrrrlz Gallery
Blondesense
Bob Geiger
Body and Soul
Boing Boing
Booman Tribune
BOP News
Bush Watch
BUZZFLASH
Carpetbagger
Clean Air Blog
Cool Hunting
Corrente
CrooksandLiars
Cursor
Dahr Jamail
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
DC Media Girl
DemiOrator
Direland
Echidne of the Snakes
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton
Fact-esque
Falafel Sex, and Other Things Best Left Unsaid
Farai Chideya
Feminist Peace Network
Feministe
Feministing
Frameshop
Gristmill
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Informed Comment
James Wolcott
Jesus General
Lady Jayne's Blog
Liberal Oasis
Mad Kane
Mahablog
Majikthise
Media Girl
Media is a Plural
MediaCitizen
Metafilter
Michael Berube
MyDD
News Dissector
News For Real
Norbizness
Oliver Willis
Pacific Views
Pandagon
Political Animal
PopPolitics.com
PR Watch
Prometheus 6
Raed in the Middle
RH Reality Check
Robert Greenwald
Roger Ailes
Rox Populi
Sadly, No!
Seeing the Forest
Shakespeares Sister
Sirotablog
Sisyphus Shrugged
skippy the bush kangaroo
Slacktivist
SpeakSpeak
Stay Free!
Steve Gilliard
Talking Points Memo
TalkLeft
TBogg
Thatcoloredfellasweblog
The Bilerico Project
The Hutchinson Political Report
The Republic of T
The Revealer
The Sideshow
The Swift Report
Think Progress
This Modern World
TikvahGirl
Trish Wilson
War and Piece
Waveflux
What She Said!
Whiskey Bar
Working Families Vote 2008
Sotomayor Confirmation Circus: Jeff Sessions Says Baffling, Stupid Things About Race
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
ON SESSIONS' MIND.... If I didn't know better, I might think Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has a preoccupation with issues related to race and ethnicity. That couldn't be, could it?
This morning, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) castigated Sotomayor for not ruling with her fellow Puerto Rican colleague, conservative Judge José A. Cabranes, when she decided to deny an en banc appeal in Ricci v. DeStefano, a process in which all judges of a court hear a case (as opposed to a three-judge panel of them). Sessions seemed to indicate that people of the same ancestry should vote the same way:
"You voted not to reconsider the prior case. You voted to stay with the decision of the circuit. And in fact your vote was the key vote. Had you voted with Judge Cabranes, himself of Puerto Rican ancestry, had you voted with him, you could've changed that case."
Now, why would Sessions find it necessary to point out that Cabranes is "of Puerto Rican ancestry"? Does Sessions think judges of similar ethnicities should vote together for some reason?
Put it this way: imagine how absurd it would have been if, during Alito's confirmation hearings, Russ Feingold pressed him on why he didn't vote in a certain case with another Italian-American judge.
Lillian Rodriguez- Lopez, president of the Hispanic Federation, called Sessions' comment "baffling."
Then again, given Sessions' background on issues related to diversity, maybe it's not.
I know the Senate GOP caucus was in a bit of a jam when Arlen Specter switched parties, but making Jeff Sessions the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee was a mistake -- and the nationally televised hearings this week only help make this mistake more obvious.
Tagged as: race, republicans, gop, supreme court, graham, kyl, sessions, sotomayor, empathy
Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."
| Also in PEEK | |||
| What Does it Mean to Take Sarah Palin and the Tea-Bagger Set "Seriously"? I know we're supposed to, but ... Post by Joshua Holland. November 24, 2009. |
Everyone's Talking About Stupak, But What About the Health Care Bill's More Insidious Features? The current bill involves some quietly coercive (and racist) provisions that no one wants to mention. Post by Jill Filipovic. November 24, 2009. |
Dems Have No Excuse for Failing on Health Care Yes, political changes are hard. But if Democrats don't deliver now, no excuse will cut it. Post by Mike Lux. November 24, 2009. |
|