Here's an argument for term limits, definitely. And maybe David is just a slow learner, but isn't the whole point of politics to "get more" of everything?

People are sent to Congress because their backers are expecting to, (pardon the expression) get a leg up on their competition. They will attempt to exercise power in every way possible, and that includes bizarre,illegal and even crazy behavior before and behind the scenes.

It's nothing new, but now it seems to be filmed and recorded daily in living color.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Brooks sat through a whole dinner party with the guy's hand on his thigh, and never once tried to remove it?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm a soon too be 50 year old building contractor. About 12 years ago my friends and I (all contractors or subs) were talking how the people we worked for had become so much more crazy that they used to be. It came out that people who would become completely unhinged clients all shared a similar trait. They all would reach out and touch us the first time we met them. It was the touching thing! We started turning down any work for "touching people" It was very effective in avoiding bad clients. To note. we were all small contractors that you would have to know someone to get us on your job, No problem contractors in the group. I thought this was a somewhat interesting similarity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He supported Republicans for 8 years. Every time liberals were outraged at some Bush administration abuse (and there were plenty) he'd 'tut tut' at them for being strident and bad mannered. Now that the Republicans are out of power, he turns against them--and guess what, most of his comments are still pretty irrelevant (we are talking about unprecedented corruption and abuse from the Republicans, and he whines about a hand on his thigh? In what world does this guy live??). The guy is a liar, a coward and a prostitute (no offense to prostitutes, who are much more honest and socially useful than Brooks). I cannot believe that he's still on the NY Times editorial staff, writing his column next to people like Kristof and Cohen who have the guts to travel, talk to people and write uncomfortable things. At least transfer him to the gossip section. Can't Perez Hilton hire him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could it have been Larry Craig?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you don't get your hand
off of there in two hours
I'll call the police!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Okay, the Republican Senator has questionable taste. Or maybe he's nearsighted and mistook Brook's inner thigh for a leg of lamb.

But then why didn't Brooks remove the offensive hand? He has clout--he writes (badly) for the NY Times, for God's sakes.

I guess the "molestation" was, to Brooks, worth whatever bullshit the nearsighted senator recounted for Brooks to cite in his column.

Right. And if you're going to go after the fools on faux-liberal MSNBC, why don't you go all the way and have the courage to name names?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"I'm not gay, despite what some may have heard." moment.

Now all he needs is a "I'm not really so spineless or cowed by politicians to have simply asked him to remove his hand." moment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

because the unnamed Republican Senator didn't ask him out for drinks after dinner?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so whatever he is saying has to be interpreted from that perspective - what is Rove's message for his media clowns today?

Rethugs are taking terrible hits on morality and the Rethugs have to be worried about their insane base.

Notice Brooks is not saying that all Rethugs are perverts, which of course they are. Rather, he is saying that all politicians are perverts.

So it goes with the territory and by implication the Dems must be just as guilty as the Rethugs of hypocrisy and perversion.

Brooks doesn't have the balls to label the Dems as such directly so he uses this cowardly sliming approach - guilt by association.

Guaranteed Rove gave him his marching orders and based upon how it goes we will hear it repeated over and over again on Faux "News" and elsewhere.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give me a break.

So a grown man sits with another man's hand in close proximity to his dick (that's how I read 'inner thigh') for hours, and thinks that his position as a reporter covering the guy's milieu demands that he allow it. And then he later talks about it to make a point, in a pointless, mealy-mouthed fashion, while minimizing what it says, not about the state of politics today, but about how the subversive power-structure in the milieu impacts his personality.

After a half-hearted attempt at getting a name to make a scandal, his colleagues give up and allow him to equate this to the sexual harassment of the subordinate women in that milieu, excusing that quite different execrable behavior by saying that the powerful men are all 'sloppy St. Bernards who need love but can't get any'.

Where do his buddies go from there? Do they express disbelief that adults ostensibly able to make decisions that affect all of us citizens are engaging in behavior so bizarre that we should think about locking up our kids? No. They ask if there are any female St. Bernards out there who "lick their aides". Jesus wept.

I own a female St. Bernard. She's a lovely and dignified young lady, and I doubly resent this absolutely off-the-wall, free-form cluster-fuck of implications because they malign a good, honorable breed of dog.

And this was all purportedly said on the public airwaves, with millions of people listening. It's finally beginning to dawn on me that feminism really is dead on any kind of public level, and that my suspicion that all that's needed to be an on-screen news personality today is the ability to keep your weight down so as to look right on camera and speak English without an accent is absolutely right. The exceptions are too few to mention.

This is the intellectual caliber and judgment of the people who stand between us and the facts of our lives. It's maybe time to blow up our TV's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I heard him tell the story and thought he was funny. He's right, these guys are all freaks of some kind. I've read his stuff for years but what I remember most is that he was the first one to actually state the Barack Obama would be our next president. Oh, I know lot's of people "thought it", but no one came out and made the statement. He did and It was very early on in the campaign. This story hasn't ended. A part of me thinks that David is yanking the media around and it never happened. We all need a laugh. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So many politicians,mostly Republicans, are touchy-feely freaks that are unhealthily extroverted and emotionally unbalanced. That's not surprising at all. Many people that are aware of the political process already knows that politics attracts a certain type of mind, type of personality, one that constantly needs to feel better and superior to everyone else. Sociopaths,narcissist,egotist,megolomaniacs etc. are in ample supply in the political arena,as well as the bussiness-corporate world, and any place were competition is present. Look at Sarah Palin,Donald Rumsfeld,Dick Cheney,both George Bushs,Karl Rove,Ralph Nader,Bill Clinton, and can you honestly tell me anyone of these people are normal?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obviously Brook was enjoying the thigh rub as was the senator otherwise she would have moved his hand. I know I would have taken his hand off my thigh, and I would have made a big deal about it at the dinner table.
She did not move his hand because she was prostituting herself like anyone who wants something badly might have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First, I'm only slightly surprised at David Brooks's description of what he'd do for a story. I've seen sex-for-stories parodied in the movie, "Mind if I Smoke?"

Second, I'm only slightly surprised at David Brooks going public just so he can get a second story and maybe one talk show circuit. The press can say anything they want as long as they spell his name right...

Brooks does raise an interesting perspective of United States Senators as lonely, shy guys who just want to be understood, over a few drinks, every night if possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cocktease!

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This was so great. I love this guy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

>>Q: How many Republican politicians can you fit in the closet?
A: Evidently, all of them.

It’s gone past ridiculous and straight to the absurd. At this point, it appears your average public restroom has more gay Republicans in it than clean handtowels. The “holier-than-thou” party has spent an awful lot of time on their knees this past year, but they haven’t been doing a lot of praying.

I have no theories why this is the case, other than I think that being gay is the way God made some people and being conservative is a choice, and almost every Republican I’ve met thinks the opposite.

But why question it? The larger point is that if you enjoy seeing politicians destroyed by their own hypocrisy, it’s been a very, very good year. So I give you the top five republican gay sex scandals of the past 12 months.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think David meant to say, "I sat next to a Republican senator at a dinner one night and I kept wishing he would put his hand on my inner thigh." Brooks is a closet queer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

our miss brooks inner thigh is NOT what I needed today. i do not need to be thinking of our miss brooks inner thigh any day but methinks the self promotion in this bit of salacious personal revelation is just over the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't know about Brooks, but I wouldn't like another man's hand on my thigh. A woman's hand is quite another story.
I can just imagine myself in his situation.
In my calm, urbane, and sophisticated manner, I probably would've said something polite like "Get your goddam hand off me, asshole"!
Did the senator get a rise out of Brooks, or what, not that there's anything wrong with that, or that it's anybody else's business. Was Brooks bragging or complaining?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

“Force (powerful positions) always attract men of low morality.” -Albert Einstein

Well, we already knew this Brooks - people who want the hotseat in politics usually aren't the best people for the job. It's the people who don't want the power that you can trust the most. Sucks how it works out like that though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DVD to MP4 Mac+|+Mac TOD Converter/……&/Mac DVD to MOV

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]