Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hitler, Darwin and the Sasquatch

Posted by General JC Christian, Jesus' General at 5:39 PM on July 9, 2009.


They're all inter-related, you know.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This week I review "The End of Darwinism," a book praised by Pat Buchanan and panned by Ed Brayton, one of the most evil men in North America.

Here's my review. Please cast a vote to make it the top positive review if you are so inclined:

 

Once every generation, human kind is introduced to a truth so self-evident, we are left pounding the sides of our heads with large slabs of salami, wondering aloud how we did not see the truth much earlier. Such is the case with the first few chapters of Eugene Windchy's book, "The End of Darwinism."

His chapter tying Darwin to Adolph Hitler, Karl Marx, and Joseph Stalin was as well argued as anything I've seen since Art Bell first proposed his theory that sasquatch are biological androids built by draco-reptillian aliens bent on eating our gonadial tissues.

That said, I wish had Windchy taken a little more time and tied Darwin to someone even more evil, say, Perez Hilton, or perhaps the Octomom. But that's minor quibble. Hitler serves the author's purpose well enough. Octomom would be just gilding the shamwow.

Unfortunately, that's as good as this book gets. And that's sad, because it could have been so much more if he'd gone that extra step and exposed the evolutionists for the purveyors of sexual perversion they are.

Sure, he's not the only creationist whose failed to expose the evolutionists' depraved agenda. Read my other reviews and you'll see me taking other authors to task for this same thing. But, you'd think that someone who did such a great job exposing Stalin's love affair with Darwin would notice that biologists are trying exploit "our ancestral ties to animals" to seduce us into a living the modern bonobo lifestyle-- a lifestyle of peace where every argument is settled with a fluid-flinging round of hot ape thingy fencing, tongue spelunking, or wang swallowing. That, my friends, is un-American!

Or, worse yet,they want us to emulate the giraffe, where the male is forced to gargle the female's urine before he engages in the procreative act. That is not the kind of world I want for myself. And it's definitely not the kind of world I want for our children. I'll be damned if I'm going to sit quietly while good well-meaning Christian authors ignore any evolutionist plot to get us to gargle our wives' urine.

That is why I can only give this book 4 stars.

Digg!

Tagged as: wing-nuts

General JC Christian is a devout conservative and the proprietor of Jesus' General.


The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Palin Getting Paranoid? Alaska Quit-Bull Bans Laptops, Cell-Phones During Speech
A national candidate?
Post by Staff. November 7, 2009.
Pat Boone Wants to Rid the White House of "Vermin"
Eliminationism much, Pat?
Post by David Neiwert. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
haha
Posted by: Robba29 on Jul 9, 2009 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Awesome. Funny how he brings those guys up (which they all did, in some way, refer to Darwin for justification or, in Marx's case, argumentation) but failed to bring up more notorious people--Rockefeller? JP Morgan? The other Robber Barons. Hmmm...the greatest social "darwinists" of American history who justified the exploitation of the poor and their gross manipulation of markets and government! I love blinders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: haha Posted by: lswiler
Incoherent
Posted by: hedgewytch on Jul 10, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This review is as incoherent and lacking in sense as the book itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I looked at the picture...
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Jul 11, 2009 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and wondered who is O'Reilly harrassing now!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh?
Posted by: wlgriffi on Jul 11, 2009 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is it with this gobblygook? It seems all the writers today are so immerced in their concept of "stream of thought" it's become necessary to be a cryptologist to analyze what the @#%* they're trying to say. Years ago it used to be that writing aimed at being simple and succinct points an author wanted to get across.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A spoof?
Posted by: luzmejor on Jul 11, 2009 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Methinks the writer was trying to put himself into the mind of a furious conservative, but once there, he got thoroughly disoriented and couldn't find the way out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Darwin, Hitler, Sasquach?
Posted by: Atheistno1 on Jul 11, 2009 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the author of this paper should go and actualy read a 'Darwin' book, or stop hanging around republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

amgems
Posted by: d10mil on Jul 11, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A suggestion for those not getting the review: have a look at the author's website. If you still don't get it, look up "satire" in a dictionary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: amgems Posted by: Basenjis
Pedantic - yes, but...
Posted by: zipper696 on Jul 11, 2009 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...will somebody let would-be authors know that the Leader of Nazi Germany was ADOLF not ADOLPH....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]