Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

We Need a Jobs Package, Not a Stimulus Package

Posted by Mike Lux, Open Left at 5:01 AM on July 9, 2009.


We need a comprehensive policy package that is very simply focused on one thing and one thing only: jobs.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This seems like Framing and Political Strategy 101 to me, but since few other people are talking in this way, let me just lay out a basic idea: all this talk about doing a stimulus package versus not doing a stimulus package is fundamentally besides the point. What we need is a comprehensive policy package that is very simply focused on one thing and one thing only: jobs.

I know the policy wonks on Capitol Hill may be confused by that paragraph because, they would say, well, a stimulus program would create jobs. Well, yeah, that is the idea of stimulus. But my point is this: the politics of a second stimulus package are a dead end. The politics of having a debate about a policy package that will create jobs is a helpful thing. Announcing a second stimulus package gets Democrats into a defensive crouch about why the first one failed, and gets us into that same "can we get to 60" dance with Ben Nelson, Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins that caused the first stimulus bill to be pared back and rendered less effective.

Voters don't know what it means to say you are going to stimulate the economy, but they do know what a job is. And right now, what we need is jobs sooner rather than later. My point here is not to just rename the stimulus bill the jobs bill. In fact, there are quite a few things the White House and Congress can do to focus on jobs that don't involve just spending more, although more money will certainly need to be spent. Here is what I would include in a comprehensive package:

 

1. Take on, far more aggressively than now, the currency manipulation going on in China. Our balance of trade problem and big losses in our manufacturing sector will not be solved without aggressively dealing with the country that we have by far and away our biggest trade deficit with, and China's policy of currency manipulation is a huge part of the problem.

2. A serious industrial policy that helps emerging industries grow. Every other industrialized country in the world has an industrial policy that helps emerging industries quickly grow and create new jobs. Yes, it does mean picking winners and losers, but we need to get over our reticence about doing that so that we can help the industries with the most potential for producing big numbers of good jobs.

3. Force every big bank that was propped up during the financial collapse- which is pretty much all of them when you include the Federal Reserve dollars sloshing around the system- to actually make loans to businesses so that they can create jobs. This "money for nothing and your kicks for free" philosophy has to end. The big banks need to understand very clearly that we expect something more from them, after all they have been given, than merging with other banks and giving record bonuses to their executives.

4. Direct the Justice Department to actually use existing antitrust law (and then beef it up where necessary) to break up the big banks and other mega-corporations stifling small business and competition. Promoting real competition in these industries will produce real jobs.

5. Fundamentally restructure the corporate tax system to incentivize American job creation and dis-incentivize the outsourcing of jobs.

6. Consistent with what every other industrialized country in the world, and consistent with existing WTO rules, have our federal purchases (20% plus of the economy right now) buy from companies producing goods in America. Big business and media elites will scream protectionism, but it would just be doing what every other economic power does.

7. And yes, spend some more money- on infrastructure, on green jobs, on state revenue sharing. On all those things that were foolishly cut in the last stimulus package by the Nelson/Specter/Collins/Snowe cabal. But this time, just add the money into the federal budget so the job-killing Senators can't screw things up with a filibuster.

I've said it before and will likely say it again): this economy will not recover, and Barack Obama will not have a successful presidency, without a laser beam focus on creating good jobs. Resuscitating the big banks, whether you believe that needed to be done or not, did not create any new jobs (although it did save a few bank executives' jobs, and I'm sure their record bonuses will someday trickle down to the rest of us. Or maybe not). What we need is not another short-term stimulus package, what we need is a real plan, a comprehensive plan, to create good jobs ASAP over the short and long term.

Digg!

Tagged as: china, trade, filibuster, jobs, economic crisis, economic stimulus, economic recovery, 2009 obama administration, currency manipulation

Mike Lux is the founder of Progressive Strategies LLC and a director of the Center for Progressive Leadership, the Proteus Fund and the Arca Foundation.


Conservatives Register Tea Party as Official Third Party In Florida
Die-hard right-wingers have announced that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is the next target in the GOP civil war.
Post by Matt Corley. November 9, 2009.
Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Fred Phelps' Church Protesting Outside Sasha and Malia Obama's School
Scary.
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you Mike Lux
Posted by: progressive-life on Jul 9, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now please explain that very simple concept to Pelosi and Obama. Maybe it wouldn't have cost us trillions in debt!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EMPHASIS ON "GOOD JOBS"
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 9, 2009 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the author across the board. The inner mechanics of the economy have become daily news and conversation. While it's all intersting and informative, it does not fill the needs of the people, who have a need to go some place everyday and earn a living. The corporations have gotten to the point of expecting a reward because they hire people. That's why they are in business. They are entitled to their profit but not at the expense of the American public. It is a reciprocal arrangement. Obama might want to point out that double digit profits are not an entitlement. There is a mutual responsibility between employer and employee. Americans have a strong work ethic and as far as I can see, the corporations are cashing in on that. They fail to hold up their end of the deal. People are underpaid and treated badly. There's something out there called 'ethics'. Just plain decency. People have a need for that as much as they do for a weekly paycheck. It's not just the money but that's a good place to start. 'Bad times for a while', why. Unemployment claims are down. No S--T, there are fewer people working and the number fired automatically goes down proportionately. Don't make it seem like good news. It's time for Obama to take a look at the faces who voted for him. He owes every single one of them. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]