Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sarah Palin Threatens to Sue HuffPo Blogger Shannyn Moore for 'Defamation'; Moore Says 'Bring it On'

Posted by AKMuckraker, Huffington Post at 7:00 AM on July 6, 2009.


Moore: 'The most powerful person in this state accused me of defaming her for pointing out the fact that there have been rumors of corruption.'

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

There is an old expression which says, "In a crisis, do nothing." Wise words indeed, which means that soon-to-be-ex-governor Sarah Palin no doubt would never heed them. She's sort of adopted another philosophy. It's more like, "In a crisis, fly off the handle, be reactionary and threaten to sue someone for defamation in the hopes of intimidating the entire blogosphere and all national print and televised media into not talking about something." I'm not an oddsmaker, but this strategy seems destined to become a crumpled up tin can on the refuse pile of epic failure.

There's no doubt that the week has been a bad one for the governor. It started with an unflattering Vanity Fair article. This was followed by a CBS piece detailing several leaked emails in which she asked the McCain campaign to lie about Todd Palin's 7-year membership in a secessionist party. McCain strategist Steve Schmidt responded to her request saying that Todd was a member, and it was a secessionist party and he wasn't going to create an issue in the media if it didn't exist already, nor would he lie for her.

The statement you are suggesting be released would be inaccurate. The inaccuracy would bring greater media attention to this matter and be a distraction. According to your staff there have been no media inquiries into this and you received no questions about it during your interviews. If you are asked about it you should smile and say many Alaskans who love their country join the party because it speaks to a tradition of political independence. Todd loves his country.

We will not put out a statement and inflame this and create a situation where john has to adress this."

Palin's week culminated, of course, in a strange, twitchy, impulsive announcement from her home on the shore of Lake Lucille, that she would be stepping down from office, and resigning. The last time Alaskans were this gobsmacked by the governor was when she said 'yes' to John McCain when he popped the question back in August.

Her reason for resigning? Here's where it got really strange. The media was unfair. People were filing ethics complaints against her. Bloggers were making silly photoshops. She didn't want to be a lame duck. The state would be better off without her. We kept waiting to hear the real reason, the reason that would explain it all. We waited for the reason that would come at the end, after all the silly stuff. But it never came. That was it.

We were left scratching our heads. A woman who was the Vice Presidential candidate for the Republican Party, and who has been deemed in some circles to be a plausible contender for her party's presidential nominee in 2012, is quitting her job as governor, 17 months before the end of her first term, because people are picking on her? This just didn't compute. Even in the wildest contortionist spin of her most ardent supporters, this was not going to improve her chances in 2012.

What this means is that now, the line on her resume right underneath "Almost-one-term governor" reads "Mayor of a small Alaskan town with a population of 7000 people." This is not the way to be taken seriously. Yes, she draws crowds, but so does Britney Spears, and I sure wouldn't vote for her to take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Naturally, with the overwhelming doubt in the minds of the public that these could possibly be the real reasons she was stepping down, questions were asked. Phones started ringing in Alaska from friends and relatives who wanted the "real story." Alaskans were even asking each other what they thought was really going on. Questions were many and answers were few.

There seemed to be dozens of rumors circulating about the governor at any given point in time, and this week was no different. People were muttering about personal family problems, about new ethics complaints, about legal cases involving her use of personal off-the-radar Yahoo email accounts to conduct state business. Then there was talk about the legality of her legal defense fund which is currently being questioned, or maybe even personal illness. But the ones that seems to have gotten under the governor's skin were reports involving rumors floating about town that there was some kind of shenanigans going on with the simultaneous building of the governor's house, and the Wasilla Sports Complex, and a supposed IRS investigation. Was this the infamous rumor of an "iceberg" that could sink the S.S. Palin as had been reported on another Alaskan blog? Are any of these rumors actually true? Who knows. Are they being talked about in open conversation at holiday barbeques all over the state today? Oh, yes.

And all this brings us to the issue at hand which involves Palin, her attorney Thomas Van Flein, and a certain Shannyn Moore. Moore is a radio personality, a Huffington Post blogger, and frequent guest on MSNBC''s Countdown with Keith Olbermann. There were scads of blogs, both local and national that reported on the rumors above, many in greater detail and with more certainty than Moore did. But Moore really got under the soon-to-be-ex governor's skin. Why? Presumably because Palin watches TV more than she reads.

Today Van Flein issued a four page letter regarding the reporting of these rumors and it was sent by SarahPAC spokeswoman Meghan Stapleton to media outlets across the state.

Van Flein's letter threatening legal action specifically pointed the finger at Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore as "most notably" claiming as "fact" that Palin resigned under federal investigation.

Van Flein, asked why he singled out Moore, said it's because she went on national television and talked about it. Moore was on with MSNBC's David Shuster on Friday, the day Palin said she will resign.

"There is a scandal rumor here that there is a criminal investigation into some activities and that's been rumored for about, I don't know, probably six weeks or two months," Moore told him.

Despite the fact that she specifically refers twice to the report as a "rumor," Van Flein says she portrayed the story as fact. The only fact is that there are rumors. I know because I've been hearing them since last October. They even have a name - "Housegate." If you Google "Palin Housegate," you get 8,600 references, beginning back with an article that appeared in the Village Voice. Googling "Palin sports complex scandal" gets you 230,000. How many mentions are required to constitute a rumor? It's probably less than 230,000. I'm not exactly sure how the legal dynamic duo of Palin-Van Flein is planning to un-rumorize almost a quarter of a million online references to a rumor that started 8 months ago, but it will be interesting to watch.

"I'll sue you for defamation!" is the toothless wonder of the legal world. The bluster is meant to scare people, intimidate them, and get them to be quiet. In this particular case, it's not going to work. Moore has already discussed the threat on her radio show, where she said emphatically, "Bring it on." She said she had already gotten legal advice, and has a long list of attorneys who had emailed her, stepping up and eagerly offering to depose Sarah Palin in such a case. Now that would make for some damn good blogging material.

So why would this bizarre comical scenario be taking place at all? Remember how McCain strategist Steve Schmidt had to intervene and explain to Palin that it just wasn't a good idea to over-react and start making grand statements to the media about negative things being said about her? He firmly told her no. And he had to do it twice. Her personal attorney, on the other hand, is being paid to do what she wants. After a recent online fundraiser, Palin's legal defense fund may be well stocked, so it's no skin off the nose of her legal counsel who has been appearing on talk radio shows, and now writing intimidating letters. And there's obviously nobody in Palin's inner sanctum who feels like telling her it's a really bad idea. So she marches on.

Using the substantial might of the Executive branch of government to bring down unenforceable legal threats on a private citizen in Alaska, and attempting to curtail free speech through intimidation on the Fourth of July? Not a particularly brilliant PR move. By specifically singling out and naming Moore, Palin has done two things; she has shown herself to be a reactionary immature politician, and she has made Shannyn Moore a lot better known. And she is not the only one in Sarah Palin's crosshairs, mind you. You stand warned Huffington Post, New York Times, MSNBC and The Washington Post! You just better knock it off!

The New York Times and Washington Post haven't written anything about this, but Van Flein said he believed they were asking questions. "What I've been informed is that they've been interviewing people in Wasilla about this, and have tried to interview the governor's parents about it," Van Flein said.

OK, in the case of The New York Times and the Washington Post, you'd better stop even thinking about asking questions about it.

In solidarity with my friend and fellow Alaskan blogger, may I be the next to report to the team of Palin-Van Flein, and to the entire blogosphere at large:

THERE ARE RUMORS.

There. I said it.

Sue me.

******************UPDATE

shannyn2

Today, Shannyn Moore stood before reporters and television cameras in front of the governor's Anchorage office and read a prepared statement.

On the Fourth of July, when Americans everywhere were celebrating our most sacred national holiday with parades and barbeques, Governor Sarah Palin was busy having me, Shannyn Moore, declared an Enemy of the State.

In a rambling quasi-legal letter, the most powerful person in this state accused me of defaming her for pointing out the fact that there have been rumors, -rumors- of corruption, rumors that have been around for years.

When Sarah Palin gave her three-weeks notice to the people of Alaska, aborting her term as Governor, a lot of people wondered why she quit. Mid-level managers turn-in their notice, not elected public officials. It didn't make sense. It still doesn't. People have been trying to guess why she really quit, and everyone in Alaska has been playing the guessing game. They're rumors. There are a lot of rumors. And with all the corruption we've had here in Alaska, of course we wonder what's really behind her resignation.

Governors don't just quit. But Governor Palin did.

The governor's massive overreaction -on the Fourth of July no less- should make any reasonable person wonder what's wrong with her. The Lady protests way too much. Eventually we'll all find out why she really walked off the job.

Sarah Palin is a coward and a bully. What kind of politician attacks an ordinary American on the Fourth of July for speaking her mind? What's wrong with her? The First Amendment was designed to protect people like me from the likes of people like her. Our American Revolution got rid of kings. And queens, too. Am I jacked-up? You betcha.

Sarah Palin, if you have a problem with me, then sue me. Shannyn Moore will not be muzzled!

 

Digg!

Tagged as: alaska, sarahpalin, shannyn moore, defamation


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Congratulations, Shanny Moore!
Posted by: Quannah on Jul 6, 2009 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good for you!

After reading over 350 comments on the original article about Palin's resignation, and after reading some posts about how "misunderstood" Sarah has been, that she's really a nice lady who loves her famiy and her country... YEAH, RIGHT.

She's an overbearing shrew who would love to crush her political enemies... real, or imagined.

Shanny Moore is right... Sarah Palin is a COWARD and a BULLY. And, it seems, Ms. Moore and her legal counsel are about to teach her a lesson in free speech and harrassment.

Oh, and Sarah....

I'VE HEARD RUMORS... LOTS OF RUMORS! Sue me, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way to hold yer ground, Shannyn!
Posted by: CanuckKid on Jul 6, 2009 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dunno how it works in the USA, but here in Canada, only a judge can legally silence you, and only then if you've been shown to have been making intentionally false, misleading, and defamatory statements.

If US law is anything like Canadian law (and I don't expect they'd be very different on this matter), Queen Sarah doesn't have a legal leg to stand on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Psssst... Posted by: ~Fiona~
In her statement as to why she was quiting she at least got one thing right...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Jul 6, 2009 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The state would be better off without her."

And all the people said as if with one voice... "AMEN!"

Now if we could just convince her to quite being a royal pain we'll all be making progress...

"So Long Sarah... Don't let the door hit you on the way out!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah "Ellie Mae Clampett" Palin
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jul 6, 2009 5:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of that clan don't live in the southern hills and they didn't move to Beverly (Hills, that is.)

We never realized that what we had thought was a '60s sitcom was actually an early reality show.

The "Caribou Barbie of Wasila" show is not funny, alas. Like when "Lou Grant" left MTM in Minneapolis and became a tough newspaper editor in the "Lou Grant" show, Sarah's new show is not funny. It's just tragic soap opera.

Her family - which she expects to use as props on all occasions political - is out of bounds for discussion, she says. Don't blame her a bit - because then the spectacular failure of her "family values" parenting would be inescapable. So her oldest kid allegedly joins the military to avoid prison for oxycontin and we are to worship her because she has a son in the military - but never question how he got there.

We are supposed to take her seriously about all the abstinence education and never mention the result - that her own teenage daughter got knocked up under her own roof. And we are neither to gasp in horror or collapse in uncontrollable laughter at the irony of that very unwed mother daughter spearheading an abstinence campaign herself.

Understand this: I'm not criticizing those children; I really pity them. If I was picking moms, Ms. Palin wouldn't be anywhere on the list. And goodie. She has a couple more - and a grandkid under her roof. I'm sure they're all gonna turn out to be world beaters.

And Levi Johnson? One lucky guy. My mother-in-law is as much a barracuda as Palin - but at least she doesn't control the resources of a state. Soon, Levi, you will be able to say that too. But watch out for the sneak attack from hired thugs. She really thinks she can get away with it. She won't, but her conviction won't help you a lot after the fact. And she'll never pay off on any civil judgment you get. A word to the wise..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin "Huffington" hunting
Posted by: progressive-life on Jul 6, 2009 7:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
considering how the left has hounded Palin and her family it would be so fitting to see her bring charges against a number of low class media sources..Huffington being one!

The fact that she isnt a "North east liberal elite" and not part of the mens club, the left went crazy over her. She has definitely struck a nreve with them. It is now reported that the dems in Washington have instructed the state democrats to block any of her initiatives to help bring her down.

This is a hit job like no other!

Considering the all time low the dems and leftwings nuts that now control them are hitting, it's obvious she struck fear into them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Politicking with Kids Posted by: CanuckKid
» Excuse me?!!! Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: Palin "Huffington" hunting Posted by: Razional Thinker
» RE: Palin "Huffington" hunting Posted by: gathaiga
Reasons aside..
Posted by: zipper696 on Jul 7, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A "Sailin with Palin" talk show on Faux seems a near certainty.
She's obviously badly advised, when the professionals working McCain tried to guide her it was Diva Time, to her detriment and a ball and chain on McCain's already slim chances.
She sees that non-politicians like Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly and Hannity, plus the undercover mugger Joe Scarborough all get more air time than any of the no hopers inside the GOP and sees an avenue for her overwheening ambition.

The English wit and social commentator, Malcolm Muggeridge put it best:
"Humor is illustrating, by means of the grotesque, the vast gulf between human aspiration and performance"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bye! Bye! Ms. Alaskan Pie!!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on Jul 7, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and good riddance! I heard a RUMOR that everybody in Alaska was throwing a big party with fireworks as soon as her sad ass is out!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bye! Bye! Ms. Alaskan Pie!! Posted by: FullMetalMayhem
Absence of Malice
Posted by: jmmartin on Jul 7, 2009 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an attorney and former news reporter and editor, it amazes me that a whiny, victim-minded simpleton from Alaska would threaten Huffpost (or anyone else) with a defamation suit, and I can only conclude that Alaskan lawyers are as bad as its former governors if one or more has advised Miss Betcha (aka Iquiterod) she can maintain a libel suit against a website without clearing the insurmountable hurdle of proving malice.

When a person enters the public arena; indeed, when they interject their whole family into the public arena as Miss Betcha has, they give up protections from defamation suits that are enjoyed by you and me. A news report, no matter how incorrect, no matter how poor the sources, must be shown to have been "published" (a term of art meaning disseminated, not printed like a book or newspaper) with malicious intent. If Miss Betcha thinks she can win a suit against Huffpost, why hasn't she filed one against Vanity Fair?

These are the idle threats of a LOSER. Miss Betcha is a raving lunatic -- and I just said that with malice aforethought. Should a trial ensure, I plan to put on a stream of professional experts in the psychiatric field who will testify that she suffers from a narcissistic complex that borders on, if not overtly exhibits, paranoia. She is one step ahead of a schizoid breakdown.

Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that she is a moron, which also is demonstrably true.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Absence of Malice Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Absence of Malice Posted by: Dak
» RE: Absence of Malice Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Absence of Malice Posted by: aichbe
Where's the Malice
Posted by: jmmartin on Jul 11, 2009 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin and her whole family, even the Down's syndrome baby, are public figures -- by Palin's choice. You can't succeed in a defamation suit if you are a public figure unless you prove malicious intent. Not gonna happen, and Palin knows it. What a dumbass c**t.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]