Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Kucinich: Troop Movements Are not a 'Withdrawal'
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
Here's a release from Dennis Kucinich's office:
Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) today made the following statement regarding the announcement that U.S. troops have left the cities and towns of Iraq and turned over formal security to Iraqi security forces.
“The withdrawal of some U.S. combat troops from Iraq’s cities is welcome and long overdue news. However, it is important to remember that this is not the same as a withdrawal of U.S. troops and contractors from Iraq.
“U.S. troop combat missions throughout Iraq are not scheduled to end until more than a year from now in August of 2010. In addition, U.S. troops are not scheduled for a complete withdrawal for another two and a half years on December 31, 2011. Rather, U.S. troops are leaving Iraqi cities for military bases in Iraq. They are still in Iraq, and they can be summoned back at any time.
“This is not a great victory for peace. On May 19, the Christian Science Monitor reported that Iraqi and U.S. military officials virtually redrew the city limits of Baghdad in order to consider the Army’s Forward Operating Base Falcon as outside the city, despite every map of Baghdad clearly showing it with in city limits. In fact, according to Section 24.3 of the “SOFA” U.S. troops can remain at any agreed upon facility. The reported reason for this decision is to ensure U.S. troops are able to ‘help maintain security in south Baghdad along what were the fault lines in the sectarian war.’
“This troop movement should not be confused with a troop withdrawal from Iraq. In reality, this is a small step toward Iraqi sovereignty as Iraqi security forces begin assuming greater control over security operations, but it is a long way from independence and a withdrawal of the U.S. military presence.”
| Also in World | |||
| House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote; Kucinich Votes Against With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America. Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009. |
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill. Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009. |
House Will Take Up-or-Down Vote on Stupak Amendment, Threatening Women's Rights The House leadership bows to anti-choice congressmen, allowing them a vote on an anti-choice amendment to the health-care bill. Post by RH Reality Check. November 7, 2009. |
|