Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Release of "Holy Grail" Torture Document Delayed

Posted by Jason Linkins, Huffington Post at 2:42 PM on June 26, 2009.


If the arc of the Obama administration truly bends toward transparency, it seems that we've still got a ways to bend.
dickcheney1

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

About a month and half ago, we made note of the way the stars seemed to be aligning for the release of ex-CIA Inspector General John Helgerson's classifed report on the CIA's detentions and interrogations program, the so-called "Holy Grail" of torture-related documents.

This document was believed to have ramifications in the ongoing debate about the efficacy of torture, which has been cast only too recently by the media as an epic national security battle between President Barack Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney. As Greg Sargent noted, back in May:

Dem Congressional staffers tell me this report is the "holy grail," because it is expected to detail torture in unprecedented detail and to cast doubt on the claim that torture works -- and its release will almost certainly trigger howls of protest from conservatives. Tellingly, neither the CIA nor the White House knocked down the story in response to my questions, with spokespeople for both declining comment.

A month ago, I wondered of the threat of this disclosure might temper Cheney's outspoken support for those torture policies. Clearly, it did not!

Well, if the arc of the Obama administration truly bends toward transparency, it seems that we've still got a ways to bend. As Spencer Ackerman reports today:

It was supposed to be a magical day: the day when, in response to an agreement reached in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Obama administration will declassify an important document in the history of its predecessor's apparatus of torture. I refer to the 2004 inquest undertaken by ex-CIA Inspector General John Helgerson into the CIA's interrogations and detentions programs. The Bush administration released an almost-totally-redacted version in May 2008, and despite the Obama administration's pledge to disclose a more-detailed version of the document, it punted the disclosure a week ago Friday to today. "We can only hope that this delay is a sign that the forces of transparency within the Obama administration are winning over the forces of secrecy and that the report will ultimately be released with minimal redactions," ACLU attorney Amrit Singh said last week. "The CIA should not be permitted to use national security as a pretext for suppressing evidence of its own unlawful conduct."

Yeah, if only. The Obama administration won't release the document today. According to the ACLU, the CIA has asked for a three-day reprieve. ACLU's consented. Game Day is now supposed to be July 1.

Ackerman has a copy of the DOJ's letter, and a pessimistic take on the prognosis: "Maybe we'll see the answers to those torture questions early next week, but it's sure not looking good."

We'll obviously be watching for some sort of news, one way or the other, on July 1. Watch carefully, though, for the possibility that this gets lost over the Independence Day holiday.

On these pages, Rep. John Conyers called for these documents to see the light of day, citing a shared responsibility:

To me, the bottom line is this: If we move on now without fully documenting what occurred, without acknowledging the betrayal of our values, and without determining whether or not any laws have been broken, we cannot help but validate all that has gone on before. If we look at the Bush record and conclude that the book should simply be closed, we will be tacitly approving both the documented abuses and the additional misdeeds we will have chosen to leave uncovered.

That is why there is nothing partisan about the call for further review. In the end, these acts were not taken by George Bush, or by John Yoo, or even by Dick Cheney -- they were taken by the United States of America. By all of us. There is no avoiding the responsibility we all bear for what has been done, and for what we choose to do next.

Digg!

Tagged as: cia, cheney, obama, dick cheney, holy grail, holy grail torture docume

Jason Linkins is an associate editor at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, DC.


Call Joe Lieberman's Bluff: A Real Fort Hood Inquiry Would Likely Shut Him Up
If Lieberman were to actually have his calls for a "terrorism" investigation answered, he probably wouldn't like seeing the results.
Post by John Nichols. November 10, 2009.
President Obama Has Refused to Stand Up for Women, Plain and Simple
The president's "toe the line" approach is not acceptable this time.
Post by Melissa McEwan. November 10, 2009.
Korean Warships Exchange Fire on the SK/NK Border
The two sides blamed each other for the confrontation, which left one North Korean boat engulfed in flames.
Post by Staff. November 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The torture issue is dying like I said it would. Only the truth of 911 will bring justice.
Posted by: pfgetty on Jun 27, 2009 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the first article in Alternet in a week or more about torture. I don't even hear anything on Olbermann about torture, and that was even before Michael Jackson died.
I told you all the issue would die.
We'll have a few bumbs of interest in the future, but nothing more.

And these criminals know it. They know how these things work. Litigation and legal entanglements and weeks and months of wrangling, and the American people and the press tire of it all.

And so these guys get off, actually being heroes to many people.
And history finally is left with a story that is mostly untold, but with a story intact that says that Bush/Cheyney protected the American people from another attack using all they could, including torture.

Nothing could be further than the truth: they are complicit in the attacks of 911. The evidence is overwhelming. 911 was an inside job.
But the media, Alternet included, will not go there. They have censored the evidence that the 911 truth movement has collected and brought to us.
The buildings of the WTC collapsed via controlled demolition. It is a fact, proven.
The planes that attacked could never have evaded our air defense system without complicity of the government: fact.
There was no plane parts at the PA crash site: fact
The terrorists like Hani Hanjour could never have brought that plane into the Pentagon in that maneuver: fact
The hijackers were NOT dedicated muslim extremists and were being followed by CIA and Mossad and had connections with these agencies: fact.

All this needs to be thoroughly investigated.
But Alternet and the rest of the media avoids all of it. Censorship!

Please put pressure on all media venues you can think of to get the press to cover and investigate the evidence that 911 was an inside job.
Our future depends on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: it didn't start with 9/11 Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Almost eight years......... Posted by: pfgetty
» RE: Almost eight years......... Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
Read the news today, oh boy...
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Jun 27, 2009 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before we blame the American people, lets take a look at our national news coverage. I googled the 'Contra Costa Times', my local paper, and 'torture' to see what was new.

Well I discovered there was a notice to a Torture Accountability Action Day I missed on Thursday. That would have been fun.

“Who’s Accountable for Torture?” program with Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, who returned his intelligence commendation medal saying, “I do not wish to be associated with torture.” Co-sponsored by the Berkeley Fellowship of Unitarian Universalists and Code Pink. Also speaking: Jon Eisenberg, lawyer to the plaintiffs in the famous wiretapping case Al-Haramain v.Bush. Film clips from “Torturing Democracy” and updates on torture accountability from several campaign groups.

Wow, that sounds really interesting. Too bad the paper won't cover the event. They don't cover torture, unless it is a local crime. The latest story they have on it is an AP story from 4/21/2009,

Probe of torture memos possible

Maybe this is why they shy away from the word,

Loaded Words and Tortured Definitions

I was thinking about calling the paper. I keep doing that periodically. It really upsets me that the paper refuses to cover the issue. They actually covered it up, lots of crimes. I think that is why they refuse to cover it now.

I was tortured because they refused to cover torture. I keep telling them the kind of details that would make a terrific expose. They keep telling me it is not a story.

Not only did they refuse to report on it, but they actually helped make it happen in the first place. They are really involved. I don't know how exactly, I just know they are. It has to do with the politicians.

So I saw my congresswoman is not only getting a promotion, she is getting married. I was viciously and horribly raped because of her, I needed surgery to be able to walk. Now she is getting married. My feelings towards her are indescribable.

The 'friends of the Contra Costa Times' over at DVC pulled the rug out from under me too. Death threats really flip me out, it is very upsetting emotionally. Set my recovery back by months. Politics is a dirty game.

So I'm not planning to run for that office. I was planning to for a little while but the local press made sure I didn't. Did I mention my husband worked for this paper 30 years ago? Were are like family, the CCT and I.

The papers are very prejudiced against Native Americans and have all kinds of clever ways of tearing you down. It is a conspiracy, I think it is all about religion. That makes the newspaper guilty of conspiracy to commit torture, war crimes and treason, to name a few.

Someday they are going to take me seriously. Actually, they already did, when I complained to my congresswoman about the illegal activities of the paper, congress voted to give them immunity.

That right there was a conspiracy to cover up torture, it was also emboldening to the local police who have it out for the very activists the paper refuses to listen to. It is a criminal conspiracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, Lisa V... Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: ead the news today, oh boy... Posted by: IRIQUOIS227
Rumsfeld: Architect of torture
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Jun 27, 2009 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story must be really good, my computer crashed multiple times before I was 'allowed' to see the page,

Rumsfeld: Architect of torture

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Today's torture news Posted by: Sister_Lauren
How True This Article Quote Is:
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Jun 27, 2009 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If we look at the Bush record and conclude that the book should simply be closed, we will be tacitly approving both the documented abuses and the additional misdeeds we will have chosen to leave uncovered."

And shame on Obama.....for.....(But, don't mistake my anger over this issue in any way as supportive of the Republicans.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: shame on Obama Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: shame on them all Posted by: Sister_Lauren
makaainana
Posted by: Makaainana on Jun 27, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
News Flash...

Release delayed.

News non-flash...

The more things change the more they stay the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN: NOW WE HAVE JUSTA DARKER SHADE OF CHENEY
Posted by: joeocho88 on Jun 27, 2009 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When people looked at OBAMA they were racist. All they saw was that this is a Black man and they made a lot of assumptions that this was a Black man from a one-parent home who worked his way up from poverty.... FOOLS GOT FOOLED AND PLAYER DONE PLAYED YOU!
You see, I DID THE GENEALOGY and Obama's mother is related to some of the most elite and wealthy families in the country --- New England Historical genealogical Society has the TRUTH.Go to their site and read it..WHILE YOU CAN!
People in intelligence communities tell me he was really born in KENYA but it doesn't matter where he was born, the BANKERS ran out of gambling collateral and so he had to implement this ENERGY TAX or CARBON TAX so they could buy and sell these credits and have more gambling chits. HE WAS THEIR MAN, check out his campaign contributions...
Elites in Africa are the SAME as elites anywhere else in the world. He has so much contempt and arrogance and disregard for ordinary people, he is JUST AS BAD AS BUSH AND CHENEY AND GUESS WHAT PEOPLE --- HE THINKS LIKE THEM BECAUSE HE IS ONE OF THEM!
HE IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE BUSH POLICY ON ANYTHING MAJOR BECAUSE HE IS JUST LIKE BUSH --ONLY HE HAS A DARKER OUTER SKIN COLOR. AND AS WE ALL LEARNED --SKIN COLOR DOES NOT MATTER!
Think about it.
AND YOU FOOLS EXPECTED CHANGE!
I would be laughing at the way you sheeple were conned but I am too busy crying for the DEATH of my country unless these SENATORS STAND UP!
No, everbody is too busy enthralled with the sex scandals and dead celebrities...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only 5 commenters, now 6
Posted by: CJC on Jun 27, 2009 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The paucity of interested Alternet readers having anything to say about this story speaks volumes.

I did go to a Torture Accountability Action Day in my hometown, Cambridge, MA. Right in the middle of Harvard Sq. on the first day in a week that was not cool and rainy about 20 activists had gathered for the afternoon. There was a big sign calling for the prosecution of Bush and Cheney, a "prisoner" in an orange jumpsuit and black hood doing performance art, and people handing out literature and postcards to sign addressed to AG Eric Holder.

An American Muslim came 200 miles from NYC to speak about his brother, also an American citizen - I think both are American-born - who has been in pre-trial detention in NYC, including being in solitary confinement for several months. According to what his brother said is he is charged with abetting terrorism because while he was studying in London a visitor to his apartment was later found, in Pakistan I think, with "supplies" for al Qaeda that were ponchos and other clothing items. A recent article in The New Yorker by Atul Gawande, MD about the use of long-term solitary confinement in American prisons labeled long-term solitary confinement as amounting to torture.

In the hour or so I was there streams of people walked by - summer school students, local residents, tourists. Very few stopped to show any interest. Just like the lack of interest among Alternet readers.

I think too many people - and not just dyed-in-the-wool Bush supporters and the ignorantly fearful - think that that torture is OK because "it's keeping us safe." Many others just close their eyes, put their fingers in their ears and their heads in the sand and just don't want to hear anything about torture. It's just too unpleasant to think about. After all, we're the people who can't even see flag draped coffins on our TV screens. It's appalling.

Anyone who doesn't have their head in the sand should read Phillipe Sands' "Torture Team: Rumsfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values" 2008. There are of course, at least a couple of dozen other books on rendition, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, the CIA, etc etc etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only 5 commenters, now 6 Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
Let's pause a moment to consider....
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jun 29, 2009 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of the documents we want released could be used as evidence in a criminal trial. Releasing them now could make them useless in that regard.

Sometimes I don't think the ACLU is thinking about the big picture. On one hand we want criminal investigations and possibly prosecution then on the other hand we cry for the release of what could destroy those very investigations.

Be patient I say...why be in a hurry when the option could be an actual prosecution with release to follow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]