Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Public Option is Within Reach -- Dems Can't Back Down

Posted by Byard Duncan, AlterNet at 6:16 PM on June 23, 2009.


Tom Daschle and Dianne Feinstein are among the many who need to step up to the plate.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

It’s official: the overwhelming majority of Americans are demanding a public option healthcare plan. And in what seems to be a perfect storm of GOP buffoonery and historic approval ratings, Barack Obama actually has the political capital to make it a reality. So why is it that so many Democrats, their tails tucked firmly between their legs, have set about undermining it?

The pussy-footing began (overtly, at least) June 17, when Tom Daschle and Bob Dole began pushing their own “solution” to the healthcare dilemma: a proposal that would let states administer public insurance pools instead of the federal government. Along with this, they vowed to nix a public option if it came on the table.

Then, in a CNN interview, Dianne Feinstein expressed doubt about Obama’s effectiveness in passing his overhaul. “I don't know that he has the votes right now,” she told John King. I think there's a lot of concern in the Democratic caucus.”

What sort of concern could there possibly be, aside from protecting the same special interests that are bankrupting half of America!? Feinstein and other democrats should be doing everything they can to insure the 47 million (52 million by next year, according to some estimates) Americans who are currently uninsured – even if that means footing the bill.

Do me a favor, and give Dianne a call: 202-224-3841

Tell her Obama’s public option is the most important domestic issue on America’s plate.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, health care, daschle, dianne feinstein, senators, public option


Bill O'Reilly Goes After Sesame Street: ‘We May Have To Ambush Oscar’
"Add one more soldier to the Left's war on Fox News: Oscar the Grouch."
Post by Ben Armbruster. November 10, 2009.
Conservatives Register Tea Party as Official Third Party In Florida
Die-hard right-wingers have announced that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is the next target in the GOP civil war.
Post by Matt Corley. November 9, 2009.
Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not "public-option", SINGLE PAYER
Posted by: wrinklemomma on Jun 23, 2009 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we have here is a failure to communicate. We DO NOT want the watered-down, trigger-laden bullshit being touted as public option, we WANT SINGLE-PAYER! Very simple, no amendments, no qualifications, no crap. Try that , CONGRESS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not "public-option", SINGLE PAYER Posted by: progressive-life
» **** TROLL ALERT! **** Posted by: Quannah
Seriously, though...
Posted by: drone on Jun 23, 2009 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
someday you guys should at least consider scrapping the "Democrats are cowards" motiff and run with what you actually see: too many Dems don't *want* public healthcare of any kind. The Dems are perfectly capable of mobilizing tons of backbone--when it comes to telling their devoted rubes to kiss their behinds, they seem plenty courageous enough to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seriously, though... Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Seriously, though... Posted by: lawton
single payer yes...
Posted by: ellie on Jun 24, 2009 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everyone gets to choose their own docs etc, but shut down the insurance companies... take out the profit and heel dragging... simplify the system and save big $$... everyone gets health care...

lived in France years back and the system was wonderful!!! docs got to be real docs again, no insurance fights, great care, and meds that really worked to fix a problem that were not allowed on the US market...

ex: kid drug strep throat from US visit back to France... took her to doc next day (ironically, at this time, strep throat was not a common kid problem there)... given 2 meds scrip to take to pharmacy... one was a throat spray, another a lozenge... fever broke next day and strep patches began to slough off at same time... problem solved, kid healed... hit to wallet, $0!!! all paid for through my payroll taxes...

nothing less then single payer will leave so many loopholes that the sleazy insurance companies can slide through again...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: single payer yes... Posted by: samd11
Well, guess what?
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 24, 2009 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Public Option is Within Reach -- Dems Can't Back Down

They already have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]