Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Time Warner Lays Groundwork for Future Rip-Off

Posted by Tana Ganeva, AlterNet at 4:00 PM on June 1, 2009.


Time Warner Cable has changed its terms of service, making it easier for the ISP and cable giant to price-gouge Internet users.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In April, a full-blown customer revolt forced Time Warner Cable to temporary halt its metered billing program — a tiered-pricing system that charges customers based on how much bandwidth they consume. (Like cell phone plans, but more unworkable and annoying because it’s impossible to gauge how much bandwidth is being used at any one time).

As customer ire grew, TWC spokespeople unconvincingly argued that the program was meant to keep heavy users from devouring too much bandwidth and slowing down Internet traffic for everyone else. Not surprisingly, no one bought TWC's claims that their primary concern was the wellbeing of customers, as opposed to, say, creating a new revenue stream and curbing online consumption of their cable offerings.

Not to be swayed by consumer wants and needs though, Time Warner pledged to reintroduce the program at an undisclosed later date, following a sinisterly-termed “customer education process."  So, it’s only a matter of time before there's an explosion of fake consumer rights groups and other fun astrosurf that try to convince you it’s in your interest to pay more for Internet. (Look forward to ads featuring distressed old people wondering why they can’t read emails from their grandkids. “You! It’s because of you and all that online porn you watch!” their eyes will accuse.)

It looks like TWC is already laying the legal groundwork for their propaganda campaign. Some sharp-eyed TWC customers noticed a recent change to their terms of service, as Stacey Higginbotham reports on Gigaom:

Time Warner Cable has modified the language of its consumer subscriber agreement that is directed at legitimizing the cable company’s ability to throttle and measure a consumer’s bandwidth. The new additions to the agreement also sanction tiered pricing. After Time Warner Cable’s failed attempt to expand tiered billing trials, which created different pricing plans for consumers based on the amount of data they downloaded, the company promised it would shelve the plans while it educated consumers. It looks like that education campaign may come now that the legal bases are theoretically covered. Here’s the new language:

6. Special Provisions Regarding HSD Service

(ii) I agree that TWC or ISP may change the Maximum Throughput Rate of any tier by amending the price list or Terms of Use. My continued use of the HSD Service following such a change will constitute my acceptance of any new Maximum Throughput Rate. If the level or tier of HSD Service to which I subscribe has a specified limit on the amount of bytes that I can use in a given billing cycle, I also agree that TWC may use technical means, including but not limited to suspending or reducing the speed of my HSD Service, to ensure compliance with these limits, and that TWC or ISP may move me to a higher tier of HSD Service (which may result in higher monthly charges) or impose other charges and fees if my use exceeds these limits.

(iii) I agree that TWC may use Network Management Tools as it determines appropriate and/or that it may use technical means, including but not limited to suspending or reducing the Throughput Rate of my HSD Service, to ensure compliance with its Terms of Use and to ensure that its service operates efficiently. I further agree that TWC and ISP have the right to monitor my bandwidth usage patterns to facilitate the provision of the HSD Service and to ensure my compliance with the Terms of Use and to efficiently manage their networks and their provision of services. TWC or ISP may take such steps as each may determine appropriate in the event my usage of the HSD Service does not comply with the Terms of Use. I acknowledge that HSD Service does not include other services managed by TWC and delivered over TWC’s shared infrastructure, including Video Service and Digital Phone Service.

The language means that a subscriber can’t sign up for a contract plan hoping to avoid tiered pricing by getting in before a new tiered plan is implemented. It also specifically threatens throttling of a person’s service for violating the terms of use (hopefully it makes those terms of use a little clearer, though).

Digg!

Tagged as: propaganda, metered billing, time warner cable, internt use, tiered-pricing system, isp, cable


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Does Ed Markey Know About This????
Posted by: RegK on Jun 1, 2009 6:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell kind of a contract is it that one party--the vendor--can change whenever he wants to?

And whatever happened to consumer protection in this increasingly corporatized third-world country of ours??? Oh yeah, the corporate Republicrats, Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama--that's what/who.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote w/your Wallet, pull the plug
Posted by: weathered on Jun 1, 2009 7:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and flourish or stay stuck in the media Lies.

That's why there's Netflix.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Continental Airlines
Posted by: tyf on Jun 2, 2009 1:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Continental Airlines has made the papers, but this time it isn't for cheap flights. Nine pilots have been sued for trying to run a pension scam on Continental Airlines; 8 of the pilots were recently employed by them. (Some resigned, but you can guess why they were fired.) The pilots, in lieu of getting a money loan, tried to exploit a loophole in which employees could get early pension benefits if they were in the middle of a divorce. They filed, allegedly, for divorces from their spouses in order to get the early pension benefits. Needless to say, this didn't fly. They will need low cost loans now, but Continental Airlines can probably afford better lawyers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Glad you got that off your chest? Posted by: KeepsonTickn
Pseudo-political issue
Posted by: drmflorida on Jun 2, 2009 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure I agree with the alarmism here. Cable modem systems like Time Warner's share bandwidth among users. If somebody is using an extraordinary amount of that bandwidth, it makes sense that they should either be capped or pay more. Otherwise, what you will find is one or two people hosting web and game servers slowing down the neighborhood, TW would lose customers, and then they would have to go into another business.

The reality is in many marketplaces, there are multiple options for high speed internet. Therefore, TW is not likely to raise rates on everyone, they need to stay competitive, but they need to be able to control throughput. Save your outrage for the efforts to squash community and municipal wifi plans.

I am a devoted socialist. I believe that energy, education, healthcare and internet access should all be nationalized tomorrow. But even then, I think those who are excessive consumers of any of these should pay more. It only makes sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pseudo-political issue Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Adelphia Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Pseudo-political issue Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Pseudo-political issue Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Don't believe TWC lies. Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Regarding Time Warner Cable pricing
Posted by: psychobob on Jun 2, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel that since these utilities keep getting 'deregulated', they just keep using excuses to raise their prices and limit their options to customers. Time Warner has been the biggest culprit of this usurious practice. Too bad in New York City, it's a monopoly! Where is that good old capitalist competition and choice?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's a TWC/monopoly customer's recourse?
Posted by: DaBear on Jun 2, 2009 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who do we protest the TOS changes to? The FCC? They don't do jack shit except rubber stamp whatever rich guy who runs the monopoly wants. Obama? Yeah, he gives a shit (about fellow rich guys... who own the monopolies he likes to bailout).

Back in the day, contracts were negotiable. Then came Ronnie Raygun and the craptasm of unilateral fiefdom and modern feudalism began.

You want internet? In most places you're stuck with either DSL (cheap imitation of broadband) or Cable (ta-da, one of maybe four companies of whom TWC is the biggest and never two in the same market, in violation of anti-trust law... but again the FCC lets them have monopolies because that's how the owning class rolls).

Muni-Wi-Fi is the answer... but just try that in a Republikaaner controlled town. Might as well argue for rain catchment and solar panels... best you'll get is, "damned commie, STFU!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anyone know?
Posted by: jim's op/ed on Jun 2, 2009 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The telecoms received tax breaks in the mid 90s so they could install fiber optics and "compete" with phone companies. But most of them just pocketed the profits and here we are with a substandard system but at least the companies made some money..great huh!
Korea and Japan report the fastest internet. And Korea does not charge for internet.
Korea averages 17.83 mbps.

I wanted to know who received the tax breaks and if Time Warner was one of them but I can't find a list and I have Googled repeatedly trying different phases.

I pay $160 per mo for the "pkg" cable (w/HBO only)/phone/net which to me is outrageous.

The cable and phone co's are looking for more money from the stimulus pkg.
Gimme, gimme, gimme.. Corporations screw us, run the government and we don't even get kissed.

imo
elemental jim

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Edit...Does anyone know? Posted by: jim's op/ed
We own them
Posted by: kedikat on Jun 2, 2009 12:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We pay all their bills. If a large enough majority of customers, all inform the company that they wish their accounts cancelled on the same day, the company will have to relent or fold.
Even the biggest corporations these days are financed like a minimum wage worker. Going to the payday loan shop every couple of weeks.
A little hiccup in the revenue stream can snowball into hundreds of millions of additional costs for them.
TWC folks should take advantage of the product they are paying for to set the date.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You are correct Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Once upon a time
Posted by: willymack on Jun 2, 2009 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a galaxy far away, actually Murray Hill, N. J., Bell Laboratories developed fiber optic glass, which is so transparent that if the ocean were made of it, you'd be able to see the bottom of the Marianas Trench, 37000 feet below, from the surface. Naturally, we've done next to nothing with this, compared to Japan, Europe, and other places, where they have telephone, television,and internet services using fiber optic cables, and at a far lower cost than the crap we have here. The communications companies under the benevolent care of ronnie raygun and dumbya have managed to gouge us to the max, while providing substandard service without annoying competition. How fast is fiber optic internet service for instance? How about 50 megahertz for the basic service? I got this information from a Quest customer serviceman, who explained the popularity of a "pilot" progran in Colorado. Naturally there is NO plan for this kind of service in Klamath Falls, Oregon, because of "lack of demand" here. I told this prig that people don't demand what they don't know about, and nobody's said a goddam thing about it here, either through word of mouth or advertisement. He asked me how I knew about it, and I told him my granddaughter called me from Japan, using a fiber optic phone, and that got me to inquiring about it. I think we'll eventually get the fiber optic service here, but ONLY when an enormus profit can be extracted from the people. This will probably be when another rethug crook is in the White House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]