Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health Care Activists Battle Powerful Insurance Companies

Posted by dday, Hullabaloo at 5:02 PM on May 20, 2009.


Health Care for America Now activists call on the Justice Department to look at monopolies in the insurance market.
l209576863389420

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

[Editor's note: For more on how you can fight for health care reform, click here.]

The biggest difference between 1993 and 2009 when it comes to health care is the coordinated message machine - on the left this time - pushing for reform. Under Clinton, the White House horded the policy and nobody could go out and sell it, or at least rebut the attacks from industry. This time, the Health Care for America Now structure allows activists a place both to attack back at industry and keep them occupied, while arguing for a consistent set of principles that must be part of any reform. Today, HCAN did something great, calling on the Justice Department to look at monopolies in the insurance market.

Activists backing President Barack Obama's health care overhaul are asking the Justice Department to open a wide-ranging investigation of what they say is monopoly-like power in the hands of major insurers [...]

"A lack of antitrust enforcement has enabled insurers to acquire dominant positions in almost every metropolitan market," said the letter to the Justice Department, signed by Richard Kirsch, the group's director. "The failure to attack anticompetitive practices has enhanced the dominant positions of these insurers. This must be reversed." [...]

In a report earlier this year, the American Medical Association found that insurance markets in most major metropolitan areas were dominated by two companies, and in many cases only one. In all, 94 percent of the metropolitan areas met the government's definition of "highly concentrated" markets for health insurance.

Separately, a recent report by the congressional Government Accountability Office found that in most states, a single insurer dominates the market for small business health insurance, even though many companies offer coverage. The GAO found that the median, or midpoint, statewide market share of the largest insurer was about 47 percent, although the median number of licensed carriers was 27.

This is all the more important, considering that the health insurance industry's "compromise" solution for reform is to EXPAND THEIR MONOPOLY by mandating that everyone in America buy health insurance from them, without the opportunity for a public plan alternative. With nobody to compete with and essentially a forced market, insurers would have every incentive to consolidate further, the very action which has driven up health care premium costs over the years, as an HCAN report later today will show. While insurers aren't the only cause of rising health care costs - pharmaceuticals, medical device operators, hospitals, there's plenty of blame to go around - this model of activism can be scaled to pressure both the industry and the political class.

Health care reform will rise or fall this year based on the success of these activist efforts, toward both the special interests and the politicians. Doesn't mean it'll succeed, but it gives it a fighting chance. Frank Luntz (who won't say who paid him for the health care memo) isn't the only game in town anymore.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, health care, health care reform, hcan, blue cross blue shield


Conservatives Register Tea Party as Official Third Party In Florida
Die-hard right-wingers have announced that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is the next target in the GOP civil war.
Post by Matt Corley. November 9, 2009.
Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Fred Phelps' Church Protesting Outside Sasha and Malia Obama's School
Scary.
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Conflict of Interest
Posted by: Ashoka911 on May 21, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not in the Insurance companies interest to have ANY sort of pubic insurance. Without the public option, we are still talking about that dead end "managed competition" that took us NO WHERE before. The Fox is in the hen house still.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And killin' the chickens! Posted by: thekidde
this is why we need a public plan
Posted by: DrXyzzy on May 21, 2009 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the battle going on in Illinois over HB 3923. Legislators want to limit insurer overhead to 25%, so that at least 75 cents of each health care dollar actually goes to providing care. And the insurers are fighting it tooth and nail. (info at Illinois Pirg) (bill status in Springfield)

We need a public plan focused on health care, not health insurance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HEALTH CARE IS A HUMAN RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE!
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on May 21, 2009 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a single payer system, run by our government like every other industrial nation has, we are the only one in the world who does not have a single payer system. It's time the insurance companies, the AMA, the Hospitals, shut up and act like you care about the people in this country, who have been paying your salaries all along. Just go in the corner and sit down, Shame on all of you!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MANGLED competition
Posted by: JackieGiles on May 21, 2009 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must continue to argue for Single-Payer health care because the only way we can get ANY public option that FORCES the health care controlling insurance,HMO,Hospital Ass. greedsters to truly compete by lowering costs and improving coverage is to make them understand that a public option is the "best" they can hope for and the only way to stay in the "health biz" at all. If a public option is available, affordable,and provides good coverage, people will flock to it and American businesses will be freed from the burden that their counterparts in other countries with public health care insurance do not carry.

I first heard the term, "managed competition" from a County Executive who wanted to run the County of San Diego "like a business". I immediately renamed it "MANGLED competition".

Neither government nor health care should be based on the profit motive. Any "competition" among self-interested health care industry corporations will focus on three things: maximizing profit, minimizing benefits and telling the American people that they know what's best for us.

My union and I, as a taxpayer, sued the County of San Diego over the privatizing of the Clinton Welfare to Work plan to companies like Lockheed Martin and Catholic Charities and won, proving that the county employees who retained part of the program implementation ran it more efficiently and economically. The County failed to perform a Charter-mandated Economy and Efficiency Study before outsourcing. We won, beat them on appeal and won a second time when they tried it again.

Write to Whitehouse.gov, look for health care reform events and show up with your signs. Relentless demand and "hitting the streets" got us out of Vietnam. Who knows, it could get us decent health care that everyone can afford when the CEO's mansion and other "perks" are no longer sucking up our dollars!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MANGLED competition Posted by: bobtr900
More of the same
Posted by: foius on May 21, 2009 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately for those of us who had a "glimmer of hope" that Pres. Obama would actually reform health-care so that the uninsured and the underinsured would have access to high quality health-care has been an optical illusion. Until the Federal Govt. guarantees universal health-care, we should forget about any "reform" efforts, mandates, or proposals. It all amounts to nothing more than politics/lobbyists as usual. Who loses? The little people. Who wins? Health-care corporations whose lobbyists have impacted legislation and derailed any real efforts at health-care reform by influencing and controlling our local, state, and national elected officials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fight money with money so we need to give what we can
Posted by: Landbaron on May 21, 2009 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when we can and sign anything we can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]