Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Twitter Explodes With the Swine Flu

Posted by Tana Ganeva, AlterNet at 11:43 AM on April 28, 2009.


Will the microblogging tool be a force for good or evil as the swine flu progresses?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

It’s not just the traditional, ratings-hungry news media that’re trying to drive the world’s population into a panicked frenzy over the swine flu. Now we have Twitter to do that too!

Coverage of the swine flu on the microblogging tool has exploded recently, and has so far taken the usual Twitter form: the feed is a mix of links to news, random reactions and 140-word witticisms regarding the virus — e.g. "@Orlanded: If anyone should be worried about the swine flu, its kermit the frog... I'm just sayin, Ms Piggy was kinda loose...").

And, like the previous times Twitter emerged as a forum for information-sharing (Mumbai attacks, etc.) there is probably a combination of credible information and total bullshit.

For example, Twitter is currently bursting with reports that two deaths in LA have been linked to swine flu. Don’t know if that’s true yet — but, considering that no one’s really even sure that all of the 149 deaths attributed to the virus in Mexico City were directly caused by the flu (health experts suggest that some may have resulted from a combination of factors), it’s certainly far too early to tell.

Anyway, I don’t see reports of U.S. deaths from the flu in any major newspapers. Will this be an example of Twitter transmitting information faster than doddering traditional media? Or of the microblogging tool spreading alarming falsehoods?

If it’s the latter, it might signal an alarming trend. As many health officials have pointed out, stirring up alarm over the virus can be a lot, a lot, a lot more damaging than anything a little virus can accomplish. And few media sources would be as good at that as Twitter, with its utterly unfiltered flood of information.

In a post below, Joshua H. pointed to the dangers posed by our hyperventilating media. The most obvious example being, of course, that if hospitals are flooded with people suffereing from minor head colds, they will not have the resources to respond to a real potential outbreak. Hopefully Twitter will emerge as a useful -- rather than panic-inducing -- tool as this story develops.

Digg!

Tagged as: disease, twitter, swine flu, pandemic, virus


Right-Wing Billionaire Funding Swift Boat Campaign Against Global Warming Science
David Koch, co-owner of an oil and gas empire, has funded all of the major organizations dedicated to debunking the facts of global warming.
Post by Lee Fang. December 7, 2009.
Shorter Ross Douthat: Europe Wasn't Racist Enough, So Now It Should Worry About Brown Hordes
The Swiss outlaw the building of new minarets and then they’re right to worry about Swiss Muslims' hostility?
Post by Jill Filipovic. December 7, 2009.
Thomas Friedman Can't Stop Comparing Afghanistan to a "Special Needs Baby"
From Charlie Rose to Hardball, Friedman has spent months polishing his favorite new metaphor.
Post by Liliana Segura. December 7, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?