Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

D.C. Reporters Just Make Sh*t Up, Part 1,489,890,992,384

Posted by David Sirota, Open Left at 6:03 AM on April 19, 2009.


When creating D.C. myths, Washington reporters aren't interested in actual data.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

I was reading this [link fixed], the zillionth "analysis" of political populism from a Washington, D.C.-based reporter, when I came upon this pretty perfect example of how Beltway journalists just make shit up:

The country today is different. America has an enormous middle class that is heavily invested in the financial system and is hardly about to organize for its overthrow...

People who have lost half the value of their 401(k) plans, in other words, want to regain it by having the economy rebound, not by seizing the assets of ExxonMobil Corp.

If this reporter was even the slightest bit interested in whether this banalia was true, he would have spent all of 5 seconds on the Google and found that actually, empirical public opinion data shows that Americans are quite supportive of "seizing the assets" of oil companies like ExxonMobil.

 

As USA Today reported a few months ago, a windfall profits tax  - ie. a tax to seize oil company assets - is wildly popular, according to its surveys. This was the same finding as ABC News' earlier poll. Indeed, even the conservative-leaning Rasmussen found that just 47 percent of Americans oppose complete and total nationalization of the entire oil industry.

But, you see, when creating D.C. myths - in this case, the myth that Americans celebrate being ruled by corporate special interests, want no change, are completely happy with the status quo, and love oil companies - Washington reporters aren't interested in actual data. They live in a world of six-figures and lobbyists and cocktail parties - a cloistered gated community whose residents are nauseated by the idea of "seizing assets" of the wealthiest corporations in the world. And so these reporters assume the consensus of that gated community is the consensus of the majority of Americans who live outside that gated community - even when the hard data says exactly the opposite.

I wonder if instead of working in the factual world, I should just start making shit up. It would save me so much time in my work to not have to, ya know, verify anything. I could write entire columns just saying the first piece of conventional wisdom that came into my mind, without even bothering to see if it was true. Wow...what an easy life that would be.

Digg!

Tagged as: oil, corporation, pundits, dc, reporting, sirota

David Sirota was the top spokesman for Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee. He is currently writing a book on the middle class economic squeeze for Crown Publishers. You can contact him at Davidsirota.com.


Conservatives Register Tea Party as Official Third Party In Florida
Die-hard right-wingers have announced that Florida Governor Charlie Crist is the next target in the GOP civil war.
Post by Matt Corley. November 9, 2009.
Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Fred Phelps' Church Protesting Outside Sasha and Malia Obama's School
Scary.
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Axelrod is a Xerox of Rove
Posted by: weathered on Apr 19, 2009 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he's simply less Ugly, Rove so raised the bar that it'll be hard to top the msm monster.

Obama is surrounded by rat-weasels;they're hybrids, faux scholarly scum bags who go through contrortions breaking their arms patting themselves on the back about how wonderful they want you to think they are?

MSM/PBS/NPR is there PR firm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Axelrod is a Xerox of Rove Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Axelrod is a Xerox of Rove Posted by: weathered
» RE: What a bozo thing to say Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: What a bozo thing to say Posted by: weathered
Wow...what an easy life that would be
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Apr 19, 2009 12:53 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kinda like George Will?

Did you see him this morning? What a has-been. Why is he still on TV? His fifteen minutes are long gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DID THEY LIKE IT THE WAY IT WAS FOR 8 YEARS ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 19, 2009 1:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Bush destroyed our country, took us to war and most Americans didn't seem to notice. Our national tragedy of 9/11 was turned into a cheap drama to further the Bush agenda. We were told to be 'very afraid'. A president who never lived by any rules in his entire life, thought others should have that privilege. So the regulations that kept Wall St. and the banks in line for over 50 years were scrapped. The damage is overwhelming. We have the right to make the necessary changes which so far fall way short of the scoialism that scares so many people. Banks are already paying back loans to the government. They do not want us looking over their shoulders and that's what life is like when you owe money. It's not over, but if the people the author refers to have a better idea we would all like to hear it. Meantime David, please don't 'make shit up'. Some of us know the difference. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your making shit up. Posted by: VZEQICVA
CIA Agents Were Not Following "Orders"
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Apr 19, 2009 1:37 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is not going to make stuff up. He is one of the god guys, he knows there is more than enough truth out there.

Speaking of making shit up, I like this,

CIA agents cannot be "ordered" to do anything in the legal sense, since they are mere civilian employees of a federal agency.

Thank you. It is nice to be reminded of the law from time to time. So let's ask ourselves, what motivated them if it wasn't following orders?

I think they are a bunch of sexual perverts, but that is just me. Weren't they raping these men too? I haven't heard anything about that on the national news.

Is it too sick to report? You decide?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I should have put a link on that Posted by: Sister_Lauren
media matters has more
Posted by: DrXyzzy on Apr 20, 2009 2:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It can help to check the record for reporters to see if there is a pattern of confabulation. The article Sirota is referring to has the byline of Naftali Bendavid. Media Matters cites Bendavid in these items as well:

WSJ reporters play dumb about Rush Limbaugh

Declaring GOP winner in "stimulus message war," media oblivious to their cohort's role in skewing debate

Even more myths and falsehoods surrounding the economic recovery plan

Despite evidence to the contrary, NY Times asserted as fact that McCain had "suspend[ed] his campaign"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The media, Alternet included, helped "make shit up" about 9/11
Posted by: pfgetty on Apr 20, 2009 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The world is coming to know that the story we learned from the press, Alternet included, is a lie.
The evidence is there. 9/11 was an inside job.
But the evidence is ignored.
Alternet ignores it just like the msm.
So anyone at Alternet who wants to throw stones should look at the glass panels of Alternet first.
Alternet has engaged in the conspiracy to keep 9/11 truth from the American people.
And considering what we have seen come from that official story of 9/11, I'd say that this conspiracy amounts to treason.

Don't worry about Washington media......worry about your own honesty, Alternet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ready to Seize ALL Energy Corps Assets
Posted by: Purple Girl on Apr 20, 2009 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These corps not only Rob US blind but own & control US through Energy Blackmail.Why do you think we are once again in Iraq? "Blood for Oil".
Worse they have two alies which work in tandem to assure they suck ever last cent out of US.Opec and Wall Street. When Natural diaster threaten to hit our Coasts- Up go Oil Prices. When Unrest looms to break out "worse" in the ME- up go oil prices. Hell when eer these groups get an eyelash out of place ( or think one my be dislodged), Up go our Prices.
This doesn't only effect US at the pump- running our daily errands, it effects our manufacturing costs, our Food costs ...Our Economy. Thus leading into Foreign policies and unnecessary conflicts and invasions.
We will NEVER be energy independent- regardless of the Source- If we continue to allow Big Energy Corps to dictate our Economic Livlihood and Global Political decisions.
Same goes for States (AK) who claim to Own our national Assets (Treasures).AK is a Member of this UNITED Country. Therefore those Oil Reserves are as much the other states as they are theirs- So wheres our Dividend Checks?
Who owns the Grand Canyon? The Great Lakes? No one they are shared Resources and Assets of the United States! the States which encompass these Treasures are charged with the responsiblity to perserve them for the Use of All Americans and Future Americans. If AZ needed Fresh water forAgriculture or drinking as a MI'er I would be compelled to assure them access (not to water your Golf courses though).
this is not only the heart of our Unity, it also is key to our Demestic and Foreign policy. Drill Baby Drill?? What do you think these corps will do with that extra oil- through it into the Global market- We will see no reduction in our prices - they will regulate its production to keep prices up- along with the Wall sTreet speculators driving the Price as it see s fit.
So not only do we need to Seize their outlandish profits, we need to seize all their assets and finally reclaim Our countries Right to it's own Economic Destiny. The Declaration of Independence Was not intended merely to Rid US of undue influence and control by Family Crests But Also Logos!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And They Wonder Why No One is Reading Newspapers
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Apr 20, 2009 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not really.

They just make up things about the internet causing their downfall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the media...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 20, 2009 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... tells us what it and its corporate owners want us to hear. Sometimes that involves outright lying, though most of the time its just omission of certain concepts, voices, and stories.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boundaries of the Unknown
Posted by: Urgelt on Apr 20, 2009 5:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article presents the current conventional wisdom, as articulated by the FDA and food industry trade groups (the two are virtually indistinguishable).

That view can only be supported by cherry-picking the science, and by ignoring the boundaries of the unknown in human physiology.

If you understand how science works, then the body of studies says something different to you. It's not a collection of facts. It's a tentative push into the unknown requiring a lot more work. Discovering the truth about human physiology is like peeling an onion, not like opening a box.

Nothing makes this clearer than the whole cholesterol controversy. Peel one layer, and you discover that cholesterol is included in the fatty deposits - plaque - which blocks arteries in arterosclerosis. Cholesterol is in some foods, like egg yolks. What's the conclusion? For years the FDA and industry trade groups (except chicken farmers, obviously) said that people should avoid cholesterol in foods. They sent us instead to buy hydrogenated margarine, which turned out to be a horrible idea.

Peel another layer. Whoa, there is "good" cholesterol and "bad" cholesterol. The "good" cholesterol actually works to dissolve plaque. Change the dietary advice! Eggs aren't so bad now!

Peel another layer. Oops, there is no connection at all between dietary intake of cholesterol and blood serum cholesterol. We had jumped to yet another faulty conclusion.

There are more layers to peel.

The statistical correlation between "bad" cholesterol and plaque deposition is present, but weak. Why is it weak? One can only presume there are other, more important variables we haven't factored in yet.

What is plaque for, anyway? It's a repair mechanism. Contrary to the common wisdom, plaque does not precipitate out of the blood simply because the LDL levels are high. Plaque only forms at the sites where arterial walls have become damaged; it's the final defense of the body to prevent arterial rupture and keep the body going a little longer. What's damaging those cellular walls?

Pathogens? Probably. Toxins? Probably. How about polyunsaturated fats, which are known to shrink and weaken cellular membranes? A distinct possibility. Other factors? Probably there are lots.

See what I mean? Knowing the shape of the boundaries of the unknown can help you think about how to frame your conclusions.

There are always more layers to peel.

All polyunsaturated fats are not created equal. The Omega-3 fatty acids are polyunsaturated and have definite health benefits. Rape seed oil, corn oil, soybean oil, other temperate crop oils - these reduce serum cholesterol and shrink cellular membranes. It's not proven that these effects are beneficial, and there is reason to think they may not be.

Your body needs saturated fats as building blocks in cells. It uses Omega-3 fatty acids, too, if it can get them. The other polyunsaturated fats? It's a work in progress, but some of them may be useless in the nutritional sense - the very definition of "empty calories." Any that aren't metabolized for energy will go straight into fat storage.

If you don't eat any saturated fats, you will sicken and die, no matter what else you are consuming. But you can survive quite well if you never eat temperate crop polyunsaturated oils.

The FDA and industry trade groups aren't pushing polyunsaturated fats because they are certain. They are no more certain than anyone else - they have not penetrated the boundaries of the unknown any further than science itself has done. The reason they are broadly promoting polyunsaturated fats is exactly the same reason they promoted transfats: the food industry stands to make money if we believe it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]