Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ted Stevens' Charges Dropped: A Tale of Two Justice Systems

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 10:31 AM on April 1, 2009.


For the wealthy and the powerful, exculpatory evidence is important.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Editor's note: this originally appeared on AlterNet's blog, PEEK.

It's immaterial that former Alaska senator Ted Stevens was a loathsome, quasi-corrupt slug of a human being (not sure a slug can be called "cantankerous," as Stevens was routinely described, but let's let that slide). Justice was served today with Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to request that the charges against Stevens be dropped. Prosecutors played fast-and-loose with the rules, they withheld evidence from the defense -- among other charges of prosecutorial misconduct -- and now the Ethics Division lawyers who prosecuted the case appear to be facing ethics investigations themselves.

 And now the old senate stalwart will spend his retirement bouncing those grand-kids on his knee instead of staring out at the world from behind prison bars.

But the case also highlights the fact that we have -- and have always had -- two justice systems, one for those with the means to work it and the other for the rest of us.

Let's be clear about one thing: although Stevens is now "innocent" in the eyes of the law, there is no reason to believe that he didn't, in fact, receive tens of thousands of dollars in undisclosed gifts from Alaska tycoon Bill Allen. In fact, the final straw that broke the case was the disclosure that prosecutors had withheld notes from an interview with Allen in which the latter had estimated the value of the goods he'd given Stevens at $80,000 rather than the approximately $250,000 prosecutors had claimed.

But, again, it was a serious misstep, and justice was served by overturning the conviction. Yet, reading about the case, I was struck by the question of what might have resulted from such a prosecutorial breach had Stevens not been a powerful, wealthy and -- let's not gloss over it -- white defendant.

I thought about the case of Madison Hobley. Hobley was sentenced to death for arson and murder. Prosecutors said he'd set his house ablaze, leading to the deaths of his family. The case rested primarily on a confession Hobley purportedly made to police, the testimony of a gas station attendant who said he'd sold Hobley a buck's worth of gas in a can, and the can itself.

Hobley, who had no previous criminal record, claimed he'd been forced to confess by four Chicago cops who'd chained him, beat him, kicked him and suffocated him with a plastic bag. The officers denied the charges. They said they'd taken notes during the confession, but they'd then spilled "liquid" on them and threw them into the trash.

Prosecutors withheld evidence from the defense. At a lineup, the gas station attendant had been unsure whether the man who'd bought the gas was in fact Hobley. More seriously still, prosecutors didn't disclose the fact that there was a fingerprint found on the gas can that didn't belong to Hobley.

Hobley's experience was by no means an isolated case. According to the Innocence Project, there have been dozens of similar ones. A local news report had "previously found that a secret audit of the Chicago Police Department’s evidence room showed that 'hundreds of thousands of items were mishandled,' and 'guns, drugs and crime scene evidence are missing.'"

Hobley spent 16 years in prison before being pardoned in 2003. He now lives life as a free man. Troy Davis, whose case is probably more familiar to most readers, hasn't been so fortunate.

Davis sits on death row, almost 20 years after being convicted of killing a police officer in 1989. The case rested only on the testimony of eyewitnesses. Of the 9 people who fingered Davis as the shooter, 7 have since recanted or contradicted their testimony, citing "police coercion" leading up to the trial. One was a 16 year-old who was told by cops that he could be tried as an accessory to the crime if he didn't identify Davis. Another swore in an affidavit: "I told the detective that Troy Davis was the shooter, even though the truth was that I didn't know who shot the officer."

One of the two witnesses who didn't change his story was Sylvester Coles, who was originally a suspect in the crime. Nine witnesses, including five of those who identified Davis as the killer, have since fingered Coles as the killer.

The other witness who stuck with his story was Steve Sanders, who told police on the night of the crime that he couldn't "recognize the shooter," but then identified Davis with confidence at his trial two years later. Davis' lawyers have been unable to interview Sanders about the contradictory testimony. 

Troy Davis' innocence or guilt is almost an afterthought as far as the judicial system is concerned -- he's been denied even an evidentiary hearing all the way to the Supreme Court (he is currently awaiting a decision on a new appeal). According to a The Washington Post, Georgia "prosecutors Spencer Lawton and David Lock argued that under Georgia law it was too late to present the recantations as evidence in an extraordinary motion for new trial, and, in addition, claimed that the 'submitted affidavits are insufficient to raise doubts as to the constitutionality of the result at trial.'"

This is par for the course since the mid-1990s. As Time Magazine noted:

One of Davis' major obstacles has been the federal Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), legislation championed by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich as part of his Contract with America and signed by former President Bill Clinton. The act was passed in 1996 as a way of reforming what Gingrich called "the current interminable, frivolous appeals process." Its major provisions reduced new trials for convicted criminals and sped up their sentences by restricting a federal court's ability to judge whether a state court had correctly interpreted the U.S. Constitution.

234 people convicted of death penalty offenses crimes have been freed after DNA evidence proved their innocence, but many, many others are just trying to get a court to review their cases.

There are many differences between the facts of Stevens' case and those of Madison Hobley, Troy Davis or dozens of similar ones. But if you believe that Davis, Hobley and those others -- and their families -- would have suffered through the same years of agony if they'd been Washington power-brokers with the best legal teams money could buy, then you just don't understand the true meaning of "American justice."

Digg!

Tagged as: justice, stevens, davis, hobley

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The major remaining question...
Posted by: pbutler on Apr 1, 2009 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... in the Ted Stevens case: did the Bush Dept of Justice deliberately mishandle the prosecution so that the Senator from Exxon-Mobil would later be able to get off "on a technicality"?

That the DoJ has been seriously politicized is established beyond a doubt. As for whether the Repubs would calculatedly bungle a case to protect their own, skeptics should review the Oliver North investigation during the Iran/Contra scandal of the Reagan years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I REST MY CASE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 1, 2009 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And we really want to believe that Bush/Cheney and gang will be properly investigated here in the U.S. Stevens charges were dropped not because he's innocent but because the defense was not properly provided with information necessary to defend him. That's legitimate and the way the courts work. But the lawyers screwed up. That's why I trust Spain and anyone else who decides to prosecute Bush & Co. and wish them luck. We would never get it right. They just might. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I REST MY CASE Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
Department of Justice?
Posted by: gar1948 on Apr 1, 2009 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...give me a break. The DOJ has become the Department of Justification. It justifies just about anything from torture to mass murder in Iraq. Now, it is protecting slime balls like Ted Stevens.

This is really nothing new. This whole government is a farce anyway. It has been since John and Robert Kennedy waged war against organized crime - and lost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Retry
Posted by: Kelly on Apr 1, 2009 12:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, so the case was mishandled. He's still guilty as far as anyone can see, so why not declare the case a mistrial and retry him? I'm really beginning to lose faith in the Obama administration. It seems we were snowed. The fat cats will still get their canary and eat it too. The rest of us can look forward to bread riots when the economic situation continues to deteriorate. And Uncle Ted can sit around smirking while the citizens of this nation end up homeless, uneducated, untreated for serious illnesses, and generally looking for somewhere to aim the torches and pitchforks. Oh goody!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: etry Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: etry Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS
DOinJustice
Posted by: weathered on Apr 1, 2009 12:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mukasey/Holder laugh in our face and MSM keeps it that way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all created equal!
Posted by: 2thepoint on Apr 1, 2009 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so the story goes - politicians have their own rules.. just ask Barney Franks, Chris Dodd, Gores son or Bidens daughter and the multitude of Obama's tax cheats..

In this case Stevens got the same treatment that the ACLU would demand for any illegal in this country... prosecutors screw up this is what happens. It's called the American justice system!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A misused tool & the true color of justice
Posted by: socrates2 on Apr 1, 2009 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our criminal justice system is a mere tool to channel the revenge impulse, prevent feuds and assuage social fears of "might over right."
That said, prosecutors and cops are human beings and screw up quite a bit. Prosecution, like law enforcement, is a "competitive enterprise." If a defendant is lucky and wealthy and somehow a sympathetic insider "discovers" the exonerating evidence (or neglected, alibi witnesses) buried deep within police or DA files, the defendant may get a fair trial. But most defendants don't have that trifecta and end up convicted.
Good luck on appeal in the mean-spirited post-Gingrich, post-Rehnquist era where judicial "expediency" and the man-made quest for judicial "finality and closure" trump _justice_...
We now become the _victims_ of the fetishization of our own "tool."
The color of justice continues to be "green."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the three-teir justice system...
Posted by: eosrk on Apr 1, 2009 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one reserved for the rich and powerful, one for the politican, and one that is racist and for the poor....sounds about right, dosen't

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same tactics as Cops who kill civilians; intentional fumble
Posted by: pangolin on Apr 1, 2009 7:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a standard tactic by fascist forces inside the US to protect their own when they get caught. Prosecutors who are most likely on the same pad as the crooked cops fumble the prosecution and right wing crooks go free.

It builds resentment that has to go somewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another off the hook
Posted by: dealmeinfo2 on Apr 1, 2009 10:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should this even surprise me, this is pretty much the standard for politicians. Pretty ridiculous with what they get away with if you ask me.




---------------------------------------------
list of mortgage lenders

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bushama
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Apr 1, 2009 11:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All we're getting from Barack Obama is continuity.

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will give American voters the power to dismiss any elected official at any time.

VOCA, Now !!

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are Prosecuters Above The Law?
Posted by: nobyjingo on Apr 2, 2009 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There should be an independent investigation into the prosecution of the Stevens case and the prosecutor should be banned at least from being a prosecutor if he is found to have violated the law. There should not be separate laws for prosecutors to do whatever they want, it makes it too easy to avoid the legal system by people with money and too easy to imprison people without money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And What About Don Siegelman?
Posted by: Ohjin on Apr 2, 2009 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking of Prosecutors who played fast-and-loose with the rules... What about Don Siegelman??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only Rich Republicans
Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal on Apr 2, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are a rich Democrat not only will you be convicted (whether or not you are even guilty), you are likely to be marched from the courtroom in leg irons and chains around the wrists and behind the back (innocent Singleman, guilty Martha Stewart, innocent Susan McDougal, et al...the list is quite long... search "taken from courtroom in chains democrat").

I am disgusted at the level of power of Republican fascists.

Oh, and by the way, what exactly is Blagojevich guilty of? Seems to me that he was tried and convicted by the media. Was he doing what Ted Stevens did? So how come we don't know that he got 250K worth of work done for free on his house by a firm that got a gov't contract handed to them (perhaps because it didn't happen)? Blago wanted to buy drugs from Canada for his seniors, stood up for gay rights, stopped the use of the death penalty, used otherwise earmarked funds for schools, and the list of his progressive ideals goes on. Blago was ticking off the wrong corporations...that is what he is really guilty of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's what u get when u hire lawyers from
Posted by: Levon on Apr 2, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
jerry falwell's law school. like that goodling woman, they had no business being attorneys, hired solely on ideological bases.
Incompetance thy name is gop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]