Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Passes Historically Large Tax Cut With No Republican Help

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 3:27 AM on February 19, 2009.


Biggest. Tax Cut. Ever.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

We talked a week ago about the tax-cut provisions of the economic stimulus package and how it turns out that President Obama proposed and passed one of the largest tax cuts in American history -- $282 billion over two years -- without Republican support.

I'm glad to see some others are picking up on this. Yesterday, Marc Ambinder noted:

Don't know if anybody has yet noticed in the Republican Party but President Obama was presented last week a major talking point for 2012.

He'll sign today one of the largest tax cuts in history.

In spite of the White House pointing this out to journalists, it is funny how little remarked-upon this is.

It's hard imagine we won't hear about this four years from now. And if that's not boxing a future Republican candidate in ahead of time, I don't know what is.

Chris Hayes had a similar observation:

On the politics side of the ledger, Ben Smith notes Obama's emphasis on the tax cuts in the bill. I'm not necessarily a fan, though politically it's true that every single Republican member of Congress can now be accused of voting against the biggest tax cut in history come next election. Clearly, this hasn't escaped the White House's notice.

It's good to see this observation gaining some traction, but I'd just reiterate one angle to this that shouldn't be overlooked: Obama's tax-cut plan in the recovery package is not only arguably bigger than any previous plan, but it's also better targeted.

George W. Bush's tax cuts were long-term income-tax-rate cuts, which amounted to a generous break for those at the top, since the wealthy pay most income taxes.

The Anonymous Liberal reminds us today, "The Bush tax cuts were skewed dramatically toward the wealthy. In 2004, 60 percent of the tax cuts went to the top 20 percent of income earners, with over 25 percent going to the top 1 percent of income earners. Those numbers have increased since then as the cuts to the estate tax have taken effect."

Obama's tax cuts, meanwhile, are short-term refunds paid directly to working and middle-class families (some of which Republicans have denounced as "welfare").

As such, GOP lawmakers have rejected one of the largest, if not the largest, tax cut ever proposed by a president -- which just so happens to be targeted at the working- and middle-class families Obama vowed to look out for.

Expect to hear this point again at some point in the future.

Digg!

Tagged as: republicans, gop, obama, taxes, tax cuts

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog Political Animal. His background includes publishing the Carpetbagger Report and writing for publications including Talking Points Memo, the American Prospect, the Huffington Post and the Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's Talk of the Nation, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show, Air America Radio's Sam Seder Show and XM Radio's POTUS '08.


Wingnuts: Insane Effort to Draft Cheney for 2012 Race Will Frighten Liberals!
Oh, no, don't throw us in that br'er patch!
Post by Thers. November 28, 2009.
Poor Peggy Noonan, Stuck Recycling Right-Bloggers' Talking-Points
Back on the chain-gand for old' Peg.
Post by Roy Edroso. November 28, 2009.
Try Your Hand: GOP Sex Scandal Haiku!
Feeling poetic?
Post by Joshua Holland. November 28, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?